this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
302 points (99.3% liked)

politics

23442 readers
2582 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 13 points 11 hours ago

Trump is so honest and fair he gave up his measly 200k presidential wage, a little gift every now and then just to get some food on the table isn't so bad? How is he supposed to feed his family without any income.

Gee, what a good guy...

[–] Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee 27 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Perfectly legal under the "whatthefuckareyougonnadoaboutit" clause. Under this clause, anything is legal as long as nobody does anything about it, which is exactly what everyone is going to do.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 hours ago

I heard the Democrats are planning a pretty mean interpretive dance in retallion.

[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 4 points 12 hours ago

I mean hey, his friends at the Supreme Court, accepters of transportation-themed bribes, may have to rule on the subject. I'm sure they will do their jobs just as they have been.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

Pretty much. Just let another country actively spy on the entire presidency, sacrifice national security, and no one will do a damn thing about it.

[–] elgordino@fedia.io 100 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

is expected to serve as Air Force One

The security implications of this are mind blowing.

[–] melechric@lemmy.world 46 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly! It's going to be a flying wiretap with every enemy of the US scrambling to get their electronics in before Qatar closes the deal with Trump. I wouldn't be surprised if there were eavesdropping circuits baked into the silicon of every system in the plane.

What a fucking nightmare - but on brand for this kleptocracy of an administration.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 8 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

To be fair, the Air Force will be stripping it down as they modify it for the needs of the office. But all it takes is one thing missed to be a huge problem. This just isn't a great idea at all, but they knew he'd jump at it because hey, free plane that he gets to keep.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 16 hours ago

Yeah, I'm pretty sure that the Qatari (Quatarans?Quasars?) know that and will make sure that something without which it can't function at all or something that the Mango Mussolini will insist on keeping (like a dedicated Truth Social console or a direct line to other dictators, for example) includes surveillance equipment and/or software.

It's not like they're going to be able to force him not to use it any more than they could force him not to tweet from an unsecured phone in the oval office and the presidential bedroom..

[–] Steve@startrek.website 4 points 16 hours ago

Yea right, not when the cheeto in chief orders it put into service immediately

[–] theotherbelow@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 12 hours ago

Sure corruption, he's also incredibly stupid as i'd bet every conversation he'll ever have on that plane will be translated and broadcast realtime into 3 different languages. Its really funny to me just how stupid of a security concern that it would be. They'll know where he is, what he thinks, when he goes to the bathroom.

They could even put in a "drop out of the sky" button for themselves if they stop liking him. "Oh but its Boeing" as if a foreign nation cares about that in the least.

It'll bugged, tracked, sabotaged, and most of all, not safe to set a single foot on. If I was in the press pool, I'd quit following him when he gets it. There's reasons the air force handles everything start to finish.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 44 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

the Constitution's foreign emoluments clause, Article I, Section 9, Clause 8, which states: "And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State."

And he's turning it into fucking airforce one !
That's batshit.

[–] reddwarf@feddit.nl 9 points 17 hours ago

Lately I have had fun with pointing out the holes in the constitution which under normal circumstances would not be an issue as it is understood what was meant. But with trump and the current SC these holes should be obvious on how these will work out just fine for trump.

"without the Consent of the Congress"

There, that is how it will be fine and dandy and he will get away with it. The senate will approve and if this gets challenged and put in front of the SC, you can bet they will point to this quoted part to give it a stamp of approval.

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

There should be a clause stating that if the president fails to comply, he will automatically be removed from office, his executive orders will be revoked, the vice president, the cabinet, and congressmen who support the president's idea will be dismissed.

After preparing a special election for the population to choose a new president and congressmen,

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 4 points 13 hours ago

How would that be any diffident if it's just not followed though?

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 58 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Just the latest in an ever-growing string of obviously corrupt acts involving this obviously corrupt politician.

In less than a year, the US has gone from a nation that at least punished the most egregious corruption to a nation in which the highest elected office in the land is held by the most brazenly and openly corrupt politician in modern US history, and nobody is doing a thing about it.

The US is circling the drain.

[–] Wytch@lemmy.zip 13 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I wouldn't say no one is doing anything about it. SCOTUS is enabling him. So... there's that

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 3 points 16 hours ago

Mm... yeah. I should've stipulated that nobody is doing anything to stop him (or even really to slow him down).

The Supreme Court and virtually the entirety of the Republican party - federal, state and local - are actively aiding and abetting him, which, yeah, does count as doing something.

[–] sfled@lemm.ee 2 points 11 hours ago

But apart from the whole Foreign Emoluments Clause of the US Constitution, he's going to pay the taxes and duties on it, right? RIGHT?

[–] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 3 points 12 hours ago

Does this plane have RPG countermeasures? Asking for a few friends…

[–] VeryInterestingTable@lemm.ee 4 points 14 hours ago

He wasn't corrupted before but now surely he is. Right?

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I believe the law says this is not allowed, we all know. But I also believe the government can just take it back when he's kicked the fuck out of office, or grounded and put in a hanger when the mid-term wipeout comes.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 16 hours ago

the government can just take it back when he's kicked the fuck out of office

I wish I was naive enough to still believe that the fascists are going to let that happen.

He'll die in office, no matter how many laws and norms he and his cult have to change or ignore to make it so.

Best we can hope for is that it happens soon.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 7 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Thankfully it won't be ready for three years anyways

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I suspect he will make sure it is painted in the stupid livery that he wanted the new VC-25B's to have but which was reverted back to the classic style livery by Biden

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I'm afraid to ask what his livery looks like

[–] oppy1984@lemm.ee 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Basically like his personal jet, dark blue on the belly, white on top, thick red stripe down the middle form the nose to the tail.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I imagined worse, like massive amounts of gold colors.

Matching the sky and clouds based on perspective is leagues better than i thought it would be. (And US colors i guess)

Thanks

[–] oppy1984@lemm.ee 2 points 6 hours ago

Yeah it's not horrible, but it's not the iconic presidential blue and white with the polished silver. Also there's a rumor in the aviation world that he wanted to interior done up like his NY apartment.... so there's that.

[–] Gregg@lemm.ee 8 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Why stop now? Corruption? Add it to the pile and demand for people with the actual ability to do something about it do so or…

[–] griff@lemmings.world 5 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

read the emoluments clause in the US Constitution

[–] Homescool@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

What does the Constitution have to do with anything?

[–] griff@lemmings.world 3 points 17 hours ago

true, John Roberts took are if that a while ago

[–] Steve@startrek.website 3 points 16 hours ago

Might as well be written on toilet paper