this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Soccer (Closing)

157 readers
1 users here now

This community is being retired in favor of !football@soccer.forum.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cpteague@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

So the premier league follows up an incompetent refereeing display with an “independent panel” that’s rigged to back up the incompetent refereeing, in an attempt to placate fans. This is just offensive to me as a fan, legitimately not sure if I can keep watching this trash.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] forestation@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

The hysteria of some redditors' reactions matches that of Arteta. Talk about embarrassing and ashamed

[–] obmunt@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Holy shit, the fucking state of Arsenal fans in this sub, man.

[–] Jchibs@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Lol. Like a black man in KKK country getting an independent jury! Don’t fuck with us. Pissing in our pockets and telling us it’s raining. Whose on the inpendent panel? No motherfuckers are neutral about Arsenal.

[–] GoalaAmeobi@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Holy victim complex batman

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KilwaLover@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

just saw Arteta collapse to his knees in Tesco

[–] iwantaskybison@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

no accountability for my mates, great 👍🏽

[–] Lawlington@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

areyouhavingalaugh.mp4

[–] Digital_Anyone@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

The fact that the panel can have ex players on is mental. Just opens it up to “Well that was never a foul in my day because were tough” bullshit.

[–] zackaria00@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

This goal is never giving against other teams

Day light robbery

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FoggingEstandards@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Haha this panel getting paid in access to support the FAs twat bois

[–] Wolfbain164@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I honestly thought Bruno could have got a retrospective ban for that challenge on Jorginho.

Off the ball, not in view of the referee, violent conduct, contact with the players head & with force. It has all the hallmarks of a retrospective ban.

[–] MFmadchillin@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Well let’s unpack this logic here:

Gabriel is already going for the ball so he can’t be fouled, right?

So, given that logic, Kai Havertz then should NOT see red because his opponent too had already made a move for the ball? Can’t have it both ways ya?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] antifocus@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I've moved on but this is the first time I've heard about this Independent Key Match Incidents Panel

[–] nlloyd16@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

From ESPN's article

"The panel has five members, made up of three former players and/or coaches, plus one representative each from the Premier League and PGMOL. It was set up at the start of last season to give an independent assessment of decision-making rather than relying on the views of PGMOL or the clubs themselves."

So it's not much different than any pundit or fan off the street's opinion since they don't have to have taken an official course.

[–] SecretEmergency372@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

More evidence corruptiong is evidenced in our game.

[–] celtic1888@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

It took a couple of days for the wire transfer to hit the panel’s accounts

[–] StonedCrow@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›