this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
105 points (93.4% liked)

News

38087 readers
2661 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Police say a former student came forward claiming that when he was 14, Melissa Curtis, 31, sexually abused him

all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 44 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm just amazed that it was called 'sexual abuse' and not 'an intimate relationship', a 'romp', etc. like it usually is.

[–] ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's taken a while but looks like we'll be able to call a sexual abuser a sexual abuser regardless of gender!

[–] Pasta4u@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Was reading about one 49 year old who raped a 14 year old and just got probation. So women still get away with much worse than men.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I mean regarding teachers that may seem like the case, but there’s preteen mothers that would like a word.

Most abusers don’t even get probation, if they’re reported at all.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I really don’t understand the psychology that pushes someone to do something like this. I suppose I should be glad about that

[–] Nonameuser678@aussie.zone 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Swim@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] Stopwatch8200@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Swim@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

pedophile noun pe·​do·​phile ˈpe-də-ˌfī(-ə)l ˈpē- : one affected with pedophilia

[–] Stopwatch8200@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I thought it had something to do with feet.

According to wikipedia:

Pedophilia (alternatively spelled paedophilia) is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.


Is 14 generally considered to be 'prepubescent'?

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I hate that I know this, but when it's ~15-19, it's ephebophilia.

[–] Swim@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Preadolescence is commonly defined as ages 9–12

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preadolescence

no but pretty close, still predatory as fuck.

[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago

Oh, that poor victim.

[–] ZetaLightning94@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That is a horribly misleading headline when the write up clearly says she was 22 and he was 14 at the time. She is 31 now and he is now 22.

[–] frickineh@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Sorry, are you saying it's ok for a 22 year old to have sex with a 14 year old? I don't really think there's a big different in a 31 year old doing it vs a 22 year old, so I'm not sure that's really the issue you should have with this article.

[–] ZetaLightning94@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Never said that. I said that the title is wrong. Really shows a lack of quality of writing when the title of the article contradicts the article itself

[–] Poggervania@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But it doesn’t? It just says “when he was 14”, not “he is 14 and she is 31”.

The name and age of the lady in the little blurb under the title indicate her current age, not the age of when she did it.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Right after the age of the boy when she did, though. It's awkwardly phrased and misleading. Just because you can justify something by saying "it's not technically wrong" doesn't change that.

[–] frickineh@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The title doesn't mention their ages. The subtitle is awkwardly phrased because it gives the student's age at the time and her age now, but it's not wrong, and again, I don't really get why you're quibbling about that when the point that it was an adult sexually abusing a child stands regardless.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

It doesn't need to be misleading.