this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
208 points (97.7% liked)

Science Memes

15593 readers
1492 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mvirts@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Bruh you still gotta publish that unsupported hypothesis

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nah, academics love their publication biases.

Wait, I mean journal publishers. Publishers love their publication biases.

Edit: I just remembered it was like 16 years ago I talked about this to a mentor. They wanted a FOSS solution for all those unpublished papers, but nobody ever bothered to put in that effort. A shame, really.

[–] match@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is there a particular journal for this

[–] mvirts@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Hmmmmm if we can sell it to AI companies....

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lose interest doesn't seem to have enough connecting arrows

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Other than that, it seems fairly accurate.

[–] Datorie@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Where’s the inevitable desk reject after months of work?

[–] K4mpfie@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago

Idk seems like the whole "write the damn paper and rework it until you're good" part is missing (It's just yet another loop of tantrum and sulk)