this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
840 points (91.4% liked)

Technology

70995 readers
3940 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Grizzlyboy@lemmy.zip 39 points 10 hours ago (6 children)

I don’t think the majority of Americans understand what that means. They’ll just scream “commies!” And raise their maga flag.

But the idea of a starlink-like business owned by UN would be nice, and not an American corporation owned by a nepobaby Elmo.

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 21 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

In the USA space-x gets away with a lot. A few years ago they announced they were no longer going to bother with getting all the FAA approvals needed for their rockets because it took too long. Space-x still got government contracts.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

A few years ago they announced they were no longer going to bother with getting all the FAA approvals needed for their rockets because it took too long. Space-x still got government contracts.

How long back was that? I genuinely didn't hear about that, but I believe that would happen. I tried googling "space x faa" but I'm getting results of FAA investigating rocket issues and approvals of rocket models.

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago

Not sure if they followed thru but this was 4 years ago I remember reading about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

You should familiarize yourself with Telsat Canada's LEO plans. Should be complete in less than 2 years.

Telsat Lightspeed

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago

They say this is for enterprise and government, and they talk about "terminals". This seems more like a Hughes network, and let me tell you, if it's that bad, you want nothing to do with it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 67 points 11 hours ago (7 children)

Yeah, let's give the trump administration the power to seize companies it doesn't like, that is a great idea that def won't be abused all the time

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

The author probably forgot who runs the nation of usa.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 17 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

We no longer live in a world where our biggest fear would be the government controlling high level corporations and their operators.

We now live in a world controlled by Sociopathic Oligarchs who can afford to create government level technology. Right now it's mostly tourism rockets and satellites, but now we see Skum weaponizing that technology, and/or using it as a bargaining chip. He has cut off Starlink in a war zone to benefit the county who defers to him, but is openly hostile to the US, and now he's threatening to cut off our access to the space station. He is using tech that WE PAY FOR with government contracts and grants, to pursue his own diplomacy, for his own benefit, and against our interests.

Eventually, someone will start building and stockpiling actual weapons, perhaps even atomics. Then we will be asking why someone didn't step in and stop them before they became a bonafide threat.

We paid for Skum's technology, and he gets to control it as a courtesy. Just the threat of using it against us should be enough reason to declare him a national security threat, confiscate his American-taxpayer financed businesses, and imprison him.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 86 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

Has anyone considered funding NASA?

They made rockets that didn't explode with duct tape and a TI-83 calculator.

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 27 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Shouldn't be incompatible with nationalizing SpaceX and Starlink. Just give it all to NASA, actually.

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, that's the ideal.

Is it likely? Ehhhh

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

From this admin? Nah. It'll be stolen and given to, idk, Thiel or Vance or whoever, but not nationalized, just reprivatized.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Step one Musk needs to be arrested and sent to El Salvador.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Starlink should not just be nationalized but internationalized.
It is internet for everyone on earth, not everyone in the USA.

Every larger nation deploying their own constellation would be a pointless waste of resources, and every smaller nation having to find reliable partner-nations to tap into for that internet access would inevitably lead to people ending up without access due to political games.

Low orbit satellite constellations are the perfect candidate for sharing, they would literally sit unused over most of their orbits otherwise.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

I think every larger nation deploying their own constellation would reduce people losing access due to political games.

If there's only one network with the same topology as Starlink, then the USA, China, or Russia will end up making a bunch of rules on everyone else just like Elon does today. Look how the USA abuses centralized internet infrastructure already. Multiple overlapping systems would be wastefully redundant, but reduces the risk of censorship.

We can't get along and can't have nice things.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 46 points 14 hours ago (8 children)

Lets reach a compromise. Impeach Trump (successfully) and then take away SpaceX from Elon. That way things would be fair.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 16 points 13 hours ago

Trump has been impeached successfully. Twice. What I assume you mean is that he hasn't been removed from office. That could be the consequence of an impeachment, but not necessarily.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml 18 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

We? No. USA can if it wants that shit.

[–] Burghler@sh.itjust.works 18 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

American exceptionalism is so fucking annoying. Their country is failing to a point hopefully this first person shit rightfully corrects to third person.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

American exceptionalism definitely sucks, but this is not an example of American exceptionalism. The source is an article from an American magazine, published for an American audience.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 120 points 18 hours ago (55 children)

You could always just fund the space agency you already have, instead of funneling money to a foreign billionaire.

load more comments (55 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

No thanks, demolish Leon Hitler's space program and bury it. NASA should be the US leader for space missions and not a South African neo-Nazi sack of shit.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 37 points 15 hours ago (8 children)

Has US nationalized anything this millenia? I really don't see that ever happening

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 34 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Tax burdens for billionaires

Also losses. Gotta get that sweet, sweet too-big-to-fail bailout money.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

NOW they complain about giving Musk money?
Most of the 38 billion was given by Biden.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 18 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Just having such wealth and thus power in hands of singular humans is risk to all of humanity. With musk you are but big enough drug fueled temper tantrum away from pretty important infrastructure coming crashing down.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›