this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
468 points (99.2% liked)

politics

24115 readers
3398 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

I mean, that’s good, but fuck me, the fact that that’s even necessary is appalling on multiple levels

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 52 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A report published earlier this year found that the top 100 billionaire families in the U.S. pumped a record-shattering $2.6 billion into federal elections in 2024—which amounted to one of every six dollars spent by all candidates, parties, and campaign committees in total.

Fuck me! I knew it was bad, but 16.6% of the money spent on federal elections came just from the top 100 billionaire families -- and that is another phrase that breaks my brain. That is insane! No wonder this country is so fucked.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Honestly thought it would've been higher.

[–] Breezy@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago

Their billion dollar status is based a lot on speculative value of stocks and not current money on hand.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't think I can trust democrats after refusing the Democratic process for at least 10 years.

[–] HuskerNation@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Well they just kicked Hogg out for threatening to fund challengers to those who are complicit in the party. Dems are a joke

[–] oppy1984@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

How dare they buy elections! They are supposed to buy us!

[–] Sneptaur@pawb.social 28 points 2 days ago (3 children)

"But both parties are the same", they say. "There's no point to voting or supporting Democrats because they will never try to change the status quo."

The key is to organize at the local level. Get into politics and either change your state's party from within, or failing that, challenge them from another party like the DSA, which has made strides across the US.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So the DNC is going to support them in doing this, right?

[–] Sneptaur@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It sure would look bad if they tried to push back against it.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

The Democrats and doing things that look bad (because they are): name a more iconic duo

[–] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why is this an isolated, newsworthy event?

[–] Sneptaur@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago

Because American propaganda is extremely effective, and most people think they're powerless to affect change.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wow, a state level group is talking about maybe kinda trying to undo the things the party did nationally, everyone was clearly always wrong about everything

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

"Look one democrat in this local level race is a good person, so the party is absolved of the fact they vote yes on Trump's policies."

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Taking bets this gets the ire of the DNC because "the good billionaires" should be allowed to tip the scales, like 2016, 2020, 2024.

[–] dinren@discuss.online 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’m sure it will also get the green party pretty pissed off. Not to mention the Republicans. And literally every other political party currently in existence

[–] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] dinren@discuss.online 1 points 1 day ago

They want money too.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Uh oh! Chuck Schumer and the National DNC Party is about to TURN OFF Their Funding!

[–] turdburglar@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

is he drafting some strongly worded letters? fuck chuck schumer and the private jet he flew in on.

[–] Alloi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

good luck, americans are easily duped by the amount of zeros they have in their bank account opposed to their integrity. especiallly the more priviledged they are since birth.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Too little too late. Should’ve acted after the Citizens United ruling.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is going to run afoul of the Citizens United ruling.

[–] turdburglar@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago

yeah it’s too bad the citizens united ruling runs a foul of democratic representation.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

This headline hurts my brain, it feels like a grammatical contortion of normalcy into a possible alternate future that may not be the path chosen