this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Watches

0 readers
1 users here now

A community for watch & horology discussion.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In a post from a few days ago, I noticed that someone mentioned that they were afraid to post about their dislike of the Tudor BB58 for fear of downvoting. You know what? The BB is a boring watch that's not worth the money, and Tudor wouldn't be half as popular as it is without the connection to Rolex. If Rolexes were as attainable as they were in past years, cut that by a factor of 10. Would you really buy a BB if the reality were that you could just save a little bit more and get a Rolex Submariner? That's my hot take. What's yours?

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vichyswazz@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Chronographs are too hard to read and sometimes it seems like the designers couldn't give 2 shits if you're trying to tell the time

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ashkjassal@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When people try to explain various ways they use the diving bezel for everyday uses such as cooking timers, timing a trip etc. pure cringe.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DaveCastrosTaint@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Not that I’m afraid of downvotes, an appropriate post just hasn’t come around lately.

If you’re worried about a reasonably sized watch being too big, spend less on the watch and more on a gym membership. If 38-44mm looks big on you, skip the rolex. Buy a seiko and do some deadlifts.

[–] Beerforthefear@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Does it feel kinda cheap? Yes. Does it bug me that it's mostly plastic? Yes. Does it bug me that the crown isn't screw down? Hell yes.

But I love my Luminox.

And the Atacama is Frick in pretty.

[–] schneidro@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I love and covet most RM models. Being forever priced out of ownership will make this a theoretical exercise for me anyways.

[–] skiphandleman@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I like Hublot.

[–] Papa_Huggies@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Fuck it branding does matter. I'm not wearing an Invicta that looks like a Submariner. I'm not wearing a Cadisen. Would honestly rather wear a fake - both are faking anyway

[–] Andjhostet@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I think anyone that would spend more than 1000 dollars on a watch is a sucker.

[–] gumption_boy@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

My $200 quartz microbrand watch is more interesting than your Aqua Terra

[–] captaincockfart@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

It's a fine watch, very decent value for the specs, but the styling is fairly boring yes, not bad, very classic as is the intention but it's not a stone cold stunner.

[–] krazedkraken@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Everyone should sell their stupid mechanical watches that keep shitty time and cost more than lots of people's cars and buy a damn Casio...I mean I'm not gonna but still...

[–] PovasTheOne@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I like Quartz movements. For me when it comes to watches, its more about how they feel and look, than what’s the movement inside of them.

[–] RatPrank@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Grand Seiko logo in the gothic font is straight up ugly, and wrong-looking.

[–] Hiphopopotamus69@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I am not a fan of chronographs, with the possible exception of the Navitimer.

Just think they look too busy and I don’t understand why so many people get a boner over being able to time something to the 1/10th of a second!

[–] Hiphopopotamus69@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Also, NATO straps are horrible and make any watch they’re on look shit.

[–] EH_Story@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Someone in this thread said small watches look good on men, but I think the real unpopular opinion here (on Reddit specifically) is the opposite. To my eyes 36mm and below pretty much always looks too small and feminine on average sized male wrists. Justifying the look by saying they used to do it in the past and calling it "classic" styling isn't much different than wearing oversized suits, undersized ties or fedoras because your grandpa wore them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AGeniusMan@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Quartz movements, especially high precision Quartz movements are objectively superior to mechanical movements

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Dalamar7@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Many GS look bland and share a close DNA design with other bland Seikos. I especially dislike the bracelets. A few models are gorgeous though, such as the Skyflake on leather.

I strongly dislike the PP Nautilus, nevermind the Aquanaut

I don't like diamonds on men watches

[–] BigWhig96@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I havent avoiding posting it for any reason, but tudor as a brand does nothing for me. I think they are all boring.

[–] a_la_commode@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The aqua terra looks so generic to me; like something a basic boomer would wear.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xPhilip@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I think the Petronas formula 1 IWC watches look ridiculous.

[–] Platophaedrus@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

The Royal Oak, Patek Nautilus and other associated designs are ugly.

Yes Genta contributed a lot to the watch industry but every time I see one I think they look hideous.

I have no idea why you’d pick a Nautilus over another Patek design.

[–] Cptsparkie23@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Audemars Piguet is overrated and is only being carried by the fame [or infamy] of the Royal Oak. Time to kick it out of the trinity and give the splot to Breguet or ALS. Heck even JLC.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›