nice stat. handily jibes with basketball lore on it being about more than basketball.
unless of course Jordan shows up.
Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.
nice stat. handily jibes with basketball lore on it being about more than basketball.
unless of course Jordan shows up.
I don't really think this means much, its a just a probability game.
It’s because offences constructed around a primary high volume scorer rarely have serious success in the playoffs due to the ease with which teams can gameplan for that playstyle.
Shaq is an outlier for 2 reasons. First, he was flanked by another major scoring threat, preventing the same level of overhelping in the paint you might see if you replaced him with a more offensively average 2 guard. Secondly, Shaq was a literal one of a kind. Nobody in the entire league was stronger than him, or even particularly close really, and on top of that he was also more nimble and more skilled than 80-90% of centers. Because of this, throw whoever you want at him, he’d still power that shit right through you.
As for Jordan, illegal defence played a major role as his iso-heavy attack couldn’t be countered by soft doubles, as they were illegal. Imagine if you allowed someone like LeBron, KD, or Kobe to isolate without any fear of a clogged lane or covered passing lanes. That’s not to say just anyone could’ve done what Jordan did, there’s a reason the 3 guys I mentioned are 3 of the best scorers of all time in their own right. The Bulls’ offence would’ve had to adapt pretty significantly to such a rule change, though I think it’s fairly clear that even in such a scenario they were still easily the team to beat each of those years.
A scoring champion typically has 0 help on his team in the form of elite scoring options, unless you're Jordan