this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NFL

77 readers
1 users here now

A place for NFL news, game highlights and everything that excites you about American Football.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Yeah, we know Bill Parcells said "You are what your record says you are."

But which to teams do you feel are not what their record says they are?

Better than record: Cardinals only because Kyler Murray is back

Worse than record: Steelers whose luck will run out any week now. Right guys? Any week now.

(page 9) 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dongerlord456@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I feel like the Rams could easily be 3 games better in the win column.

[–] treeheemelee@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

We are worse than 2-8. We should really be 0-10. No idea how we beat the Bills, and the Jets game was pretty much the only one where Mac was anything approaching an average NFL QB.

[–] AnthonyBarrHeHe@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I think the 6-4 Vikings are better than their record honestly. The insanely bad/unlucky turnovers earlier in the year practically had them start 0-3 but they were still 1 score games. Take away just 2 of those fumbles and they’re prolly sitting at 8-2. Dobbs is playing bonkers and Flores has this defense borderline top 10. Just absolutely madness

better than: Bengals

worse: Steelers

[–] ultgambit266@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Cardinals even without Murray being back are way better than their record shows, other than the Cleveland game, they’ve kept all the games competitive

[–] gbomb89@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

As a Seahawks fan I think we are worse.

[–] justa_flesh_wound@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

If you flip all our 1 score games we are 6-3,

So I would say we are right where we are supposed to be.

Our 1 score games: W @ Chiefs and Chargers, L against bitch pigeons in OT

[–] DrDilatory@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Pats are worse than their record. Beating the bills was a miracle. We should have only one win this year

[–] jmcdon00@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Better than record: Vikings. 6-4 record, but they have won 5 straight without Justin Jefferson.

Worse than record: Browns. No idea how they got to 6-3 with their terrible QB play, which will likely get worse now that Watson is out.

[–] batman1043@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

We Don't Apologize For Winning #HereWeGoSteelers!

[–] Pockstuff@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Better: Bengals Worse: Steelers

[–] pacoLL3@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

While i agree that 6 - 3 is seemingly too high for the Steelers, i don't think they are miles off either.

First of all, the teams they played against currently sit at a combined 44 - 39, so actually above average. And this is including the Steelers games. Excluding these games, the teams are even at 41 - 33.

And if we look closer at their results, it's even clearer they should be at least positive:

They are 3 - 0 against teams with an negative record (Titans, Rams, Packers, all 3-6)

They are 1 - 1 against teams with 5-5 and 5-4 (Raiders, Texans)

But most importantly:

They are 2 - 2 against teams with an record of 6-3 or higher.

Their only losses are against the 49ers and Jaguars (both 6-3) and one against the Texans, who started the season 1-2 but are now 5-1 in the last 6 games, including the Steelers game. These were hardly mediocre teams.

All in all i think 5-4 is pretty much exactly where the Steelers should be, certainly not lower then that though.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›