this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
809 points (95.4% liked)

politics

24568 readers
3946 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 36 points 4 days ago

I'd rather AOC knock Schumer out of the Senate in 2028. (Or a special election if he for whatever reason is unable to complete his term.) Congress needs as much replacement as the White House.

But it is really frustrating framing how the article is already conceding Trump will be the dominant candidate for a third term in 2028. That's a long way off.

[–] Cocopanda@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

She should run for the senate seat when chuck leaves office after he finally comes to his senses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lasers4eyes@piefed.zip 32 points 4 days ago (6 children)

screeching that she’s “NOT qualified for office,” that she’s “stupid” and the “dumbest,” while defending his own intelligence by noting he “ACED” a cognitive test doctors use to determine if an elderly person’s dementia has gotten so bad they need to be put in full-time care

God, this guy loves bragging about "acing" his cognitive tests.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I think AOC would make for a much better Presidential Candidate in 2036 or 2042, after a term or two in Chuck's Senate seat. (Or maybe even as VP)

But, she is still a good candidate right now, and the next election will be crucial for the country. If 2028 AOC is the best option for Democrats, we should run with it. I would definitely sooner vote for her than the Next One Up for Democrats.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ofcourse@lemmy.ml 25 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (11 children)

I agree that she should run, but as an independent candidate because the DNC will never give her a honest shot in the primaries.

Americans however are unlikely to elect her especially due to electoral college as there are plenty racist and misogynistic voters in the swing states.

But if she’s able to raise money in the process to give her a real shot, US will finally have a viable third party candidate. If it looks like she’ll only split the Dem vote without winning, the raised money can be used to support progressive candidates in local elections.

Either way, I think US needs a progressive liberals party and soon because there’s a lot of House and Senate seat elections coming up and as we have seen from the GOP playbook, local elections are as relevant and influential as the national ones.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Naevermix@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Zohran Mamdani is just the democratic primary if I understand correctly. He's not the mayor of New York yet.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

It's been assumed that whoever the democratic nominee is will win since Adams is extremely unpopular and so is the republican party in NY generally

Of course Cuomo running independent complicates it, and the democratic party not enthusiastically endorsing Mamdani certainly doesnt help. Then again, the party had a 30% approval rating last i checked, so maybe that actually helps....

But he's the most popular debut candidate since AOC, so he still has a very good chance.

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (9 children)

I think the only legitimate chance Democrats have is Luigi Mangione. You have to fight fire with fire. He's young, smart, charismatic, from a well to do background, and not even a felon like our current president. Also brave unlike our Republican chickenshit losers. Sanders as running mate.

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The only good shot Democrats have

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kukui@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

He's young

Right, so we need to wait 8 more years for the "only legitimate chance Democrats have" to reach the minimum age to assume office?

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Luigi, allegedly, doesn't let the rules get in the way of doing what's right.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 11 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Simple. I'm voting AOC if her name is on the ballot. Take my vote AOC!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

"Why AOC should've run for president in 2024"

[–] anachrohack@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I feel like we try to shoehorn our political heroes into running for president. Why not senator? Why not speaker of the house, even? Speaker of the house is arguable more powerful than President in the democratic party - she has the power to shape the priorities and strategies of the entire party. Nancy Pelosi is probably more influential over the state of the Democratic party than Joe Biden or Barrack Obama were

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›