this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023

147 points (94.0% liked)

Technology

58173 readers

3493 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

147

OpenAI board in discussions with Sam Altman to return as CEO (www.theverge.com)

submitted 10 months ago by abobla@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

37 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 37 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] burliman@lemm.ee 80 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Okay so you fired someone, then decided later to bring them back. This means whatever guideline you use to fire people is floppy or petulant, you caved to public backlash, or the firing guidelines are clear but the information you took grave actions upon was bad (was unreliable and/or unverified).

Anyway, none of those things are good markers of leadership.

Edit: Forgot another reason for recanting a firing: your boss told you that you don’t have the authority. Nothing takes away your leadership teeth like that…

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

your boss told you that you don’t have the authority

Like when Michael tried to fire Kitty.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What was her schtick again, the flashing + "say goodbye to these"? Must rewatch

[–] SatyrSack@lemmy.one 1 points 10 months ago

Woah, they're crooked!

[–] mr_tyler_durden@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

How is it that all these comments miss the fact that there are zero leaks from the board (even anonymously) that this is the case? This is so clearly a move by Altman and his supporters to chum the waters and make the board look incompetent (when there is no evidence to corroborate it). “People in the know” is what you say when you can’t be more specific and could literally be any from my Altman himself to disgruntled employees. You can bet your bottom dollar if they had a real line into the board you’d give something much less wishy-washy.

Stop reading headlines as facts people.

[–] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 5 points 10 months ago

Even if the headlines are true, the reason to bring him back is internal backlash.

[–] paulzy@lemmy.world 64 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Maybe they just asked chatGPT who to hire.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Called it lol. This could be one of the greatest marketing coups of all time. Its all about the guerrilla marketing, ads are useless, everyones drowning in data and information, cha ching cha ching. Said the same thing about OnlyFans. Give people a show and they'll shower you back with their own gives

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

deleted

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 10 months ago

I dunno, it makes them look incompetent at running themselves. If I were an investor, I wouldn't want anything to do with them after that, nor if I were a potential or current customer.

But as I just finished saying to someone else, humans don't really make the most sensible decisions so it might work anyway

[–] Contend6248@feddit.de 6 points 10 months ago

The magic 8-ball of the 21th century

[–] domage@lemmy.world 57 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That’s hilarious

[–] abobla@lemm.ee 27 points 10 months ago

this is peak comedy

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I guess it might have helped if they gave clearer details on the firing

No one knows how to feel because they didn't explain what was up

[–] tinkeringidiot@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago

This is how you say “wait, shit, we fucked up” in Board of Directors.

Be interesting to see how many of them still have seats by Christmas.

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 37 points 10 months ago (2 children)

So, folks, who can take over as CEO?

Well theres... (Looks at list of top people who immediately quit after the announcement) ... Aah shit.

[–] BarrierWithAshes@kbin.social 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'll do it. I can save OpenAI.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago

Hey ChatGPT, can you write me a business plan for an AI company?

[–] Contend6248@feddit.de 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

With ChatGPT literally anyone can be CEO these days, i would get rid of the board first

[–] sviper@programming.dev 34 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Makes me remember how greeks made a rule to give capital punishment only after sleeping over the decision.

[–] abobla@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

didn't know that. This is very interesting

[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

lol. clown show

[–] abobla@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

🤡

[–] livus@kbin.social 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Well the two people who quit in solidarity must be feeling pretty cool right about now.

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What if this was a plot to get them to quit...

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I think its fake. This lie is a moat/cake

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Not so folie á deux ;)

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 months ago

We need Armando Ianucci (The Thick of it, In the Loop, The Death of Stalin) to get the film rights to this when the dust settles. Holy shit what an opportunity to skewer high tech idiots and business idiocy in general.

[–] Tygr@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They got a look at how many were quitting on Monday and realized their whole company was screwed. This is how Sam will wipe out the board of directors, possibly with ownership percentage?

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Based, seriously

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 10 points 10 months ago

Based is not the word I'd use for Altman

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:

The OpenAI board is in discussions with Sam Altman to return to CEO, according to multiple people familiar with the matter.

One of them said Altman, who was suddenly fired by the board on Friday, is “ambivalent” about coming back and would want significant governance changes.

Developing...

The original article contains 47 words, the summary contains 47 words. Saved 0%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] abobla@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

saved 0%? Wtf?

[–] stifle867@programming.dev 21 points 10 months ago

The bigger wtf is saying the article is only 47 words

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 5 points 10 months ago

Shoulda used ChatGPT.

[–] sugarfree@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Hahahahahahahahahaha

[–] DeathWearsANecktie@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

That was quick