this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
322 points (99.1% liked)

politics

24781 readers
3070 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I didn't realize government employees could use "it would embarrass me" as a valid reason for exemption from Open Records laws...

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

So, entering Hunter's dong into the Congressional record for some reason....that's okay, but if a qon is embarrassed by releasing something...it's not?

[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 3 points 23 hours ago

Thank you. That is precisely the intent. Greg Abbot would have some serious issues trying to roll through the sand. Then would have the gall to blame it on immigration & Biden. No sensible individual with WC assistance or not would see it that way.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 119 points 1 day ago

Why didn’t Hillary think of this defense?

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 80 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Aleshire said it’s not unusual for government agencies to tap the common-law privacy exception in an attempt to withhold records from the public. But he’s used to it being cited in cases that involve children, medical data or other highly personal information — not for emails between an elected official and a businessman.

Until proven otherwise, I’m assuming the emails include details about Musk’s ties to Epstein.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Could be Epstein. Ken Paxton's wife is divorcing him over some kind of "biblical affair" could be Greg, he's got a mobile cuck chair.

Hey now we shouldn't insult him because of his disability, imagine what it makes those who did nothing wrong feel. Oh who am I kidding id dump him onto tarmac hot enough to give third degree burns and tell him to walk if he doesn't want to be further crippled or die, if he tries to crawl I'm taking fingers then limbs.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago

"We don't want to release these emails on the grounds that it will make us look bad."

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

Embarrassment is the default state of the Turdpublican.

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.snekerpimp.space 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s all talk about hemorrhoids. What creams work the best, best way to scratch them, etc.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I swear by Taintspackle, a Holepucker product

[–] tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Conglomerated with DarkStar Industries and featured through Pegged Productions

[–] swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

On the whole, I believe Preparation H feels good...

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Assuming weird unbiblical sex stuff here

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Must be pretty weird then; even the bible mentions some pretty weird sex stuff.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean even vanilla sex while wearing mixed fibers and eating shelfish is verboten, but your mileage may vary depending on how heathen you live. I'm a filthy sinner at the best of times but I'm not a Texas GOP leader.

What about Lot, his daughters and a lot of wine?

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Until further clarification I think everyone needs to go out, and say that this confirms abbot is having gay sex with Elon Musk.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If that's all it is then it's not that bad (though unelectable in Texas). I suspect it's much worse though.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The idea there lol... sadly I think conservatives are more likely to be afraid of being though to be gay, than to be pedophiles.

Hence the funniest way to bring them out might be if they are accused of having sex with of age people of the same sex... they could respond "no no really, I had sex with a 15 year old girl, I'm not gay".

[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

No more embarrassing and useless than Greg Abbot trying to maneuver around at the beach.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Keeps getting reported as "ableist", but I have to say, as a wheelchair user, it's not offensive.

The target is Greg Abbot, who happens to be in a wheelchair, not wheelchair users in general.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This looks like the beginning of a wheelchair supervillain

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

Gotta say, I was tempted, but $13,000 and I'd need a truck to haul it and ramps to get it in and out.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Haha the joke is wheelchair, very funny!

[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago

The joke is in the wheelchair. Greg Abbott dreams about Sparta kicking Mexicans into the Rio Grande. He deserves the same.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

They were sexting.

[–] dan69@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Read up zero aspects about this: TX gov: no daddy tesla, I need jawabs puease eL0Ň: hey you down there! shut up u!

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

This guy knows how to generate interest

[–] Heikki2@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Wild guess, the emails are full of Abbot's dick and atrophy legs pictures next to a ruler, after Elon said he could make him bionic legs.

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Gov. Abbott is too embarrassing to be released in public.