this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NBA - Main

14 readers
4 users here now

Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This isn't a knock on Shai Gilgeous-Alexander at all (because he's awesome), but rather an observation about the power and efficiency of free throw shooting. SGA's splits happen to illustrate it well this year.

Gilgeous-Alexander has improved across the board -- and considerably so. But because SGA is shooting fewer free throws (from 10.9 to 6.4), his overall efficiency has remained constant.

Two-point percentage: up from 53.3% to 57.5%

Three-point percentage: up from 34.5% to 36.0%

Free-throw percentage: up from 90.5% to 92.8%

True shooting percentage: dead even at 62.6% to 62.6%


all stats from basketball-reference

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] coolstorybroham@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

honestly this just makes Steph’s consistently high TS seem more absurd

[–] Sternjunk@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I bet he’ll dominate in the playoffs tho. I find people who rely on the whistle to get high TS% are very inconsistent in the playoffs.

[–] azzelle@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I find people who rely on the whistle to get high TS%

lol they rely on the whistle to increase ppg, not TS. foul baiting decreases FG% and TS%

[–] azzelle@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I find people who rely on the whistle to get high TS%

lol they rely on the whistle to increase ppg, not TS. foul baiting decreases FG% and TS%

[–] Dreamlifehunting@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

In case anyone wants to learn more about this type of phenomenon, in statistics this is called Simpson's Paradox, when an effect is observed in each subgroup, but disappears when the groups are combined, due to frequency data (ie. the amount of datapoints does not remain the same in each group).

[–] BearRedWood@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

he's shooting more 3s too, pretty nuts

[–] Mahomeboy001@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

This is why EFG% > TS% when comparing how good scorers are

[–] collinCOYS@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I see his box scores and he often only ends up with 0-3 3pa. Why is that? Lack of confidence in his 3?

[–] TheYamss@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Simpson's Paradox baby

[–] Aeration8763@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

He gets called a free throw merchant, which if you watch him for even 1 game is clearly false, but I would like to know how he compares on FG% on shooting fouls. He seems to make a lot of them when he's fouled, compared to someone like Harden who was never trying to for a bucket.

[–] Aeration8763@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

He gets called a free throw merchant, which if you watch him for even 1 game is clearly false, but I would like to know how he compares on FG% on shooting fouls. He seems to make a lot of them when he's fouled, compared to someone like Harden who was never trying to for a bucket.

[–] butterflyl3@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

That's good. While TS% measures scoring ability, a lower difference between FG% and TS% means less variance and off games, especially in the playoffs.