this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
699 points (99.4% liked)

Not The Onion

18354 readers
1195 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago
[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's a fucking idiotic idea.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

No, it's fine and makes total sense if your goal is to incentivize your company's suppliers and affiliates to KILL PEOPLE.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

I’m so tired of living under capitalism. Can you all please get some fucking class consciousness so we can get out of this hellscape?

[–] Soleos@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Garbage humans in, garbage AI out

[–] AngularViscosity@piefed.social 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So what's the point of having insurance if you can't claim what you need?

[–] Soleos@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

The point is fraud. They give you just enough to think they will cover you when you really need it. And by then, they've already extracted the optimum amount they were gonna get from you.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The term 'perverse incentive' springs to mind, except there'll be nothing unexpected about the consequences.

the incentives perfectly match the goal

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Wasnt incentivising robots to kill humans supoosed to be prevented by those Azimov laws?

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

Fucking bots, they started disallowing us from browsing the web. Sure they'll be more careful with our lives.

[–] kelpie_returns@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago
[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 3 points 1 month ago

Will it then be fined when it gets it wrong after manual review? Will the person be compensated too?

Of course what they forget is other AI companies will game it on the other end to add new codes to claim that won't be denied.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Good Job, Luigi! You saved healthcare!

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The ethics of sabotaging AI are even less murky than the ethics of what Luigi did. We need tech Luigis.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Now we're talking

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ninjabard@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

We really need to move to a single payer system when Trump kicks the covfefe bucket.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›