this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
259 points (99.6% liked)

politics

26232 readers
3203 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/46570665

“I told Director Kash Patel that the FBI has names of 20 men to whom Jeffrey Epstein trafficked women and girls,” Massie wrote on X. “This basic fact seemed to surprise him. Why?

“Is the FBI withholding those names to protect the President’s rich and powerful friends?” Massie continued, before demanding that the administration “release the Epstein files.”

Massie has been fighting for the release of more documents related to the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, the deceased pedophilic sex trafficker with connections to the rich and powerful, including President Donald Trump.

“I believe that Trump is trying to protect rich and powerful people who are his friends, and that is why this material is not getting released,” Massie told CNN last week.

Even Patel ferociously argued for the total release of the Epstein files—before he formally entered the Trump administration. Months before Patel’s name was floated to run the bureau, Patel had told podcaster Benny Johnson that he believed the documents were being shielded from public view because of “who’s on that list.” During his confirmation hearing, the 45-year-old swore there would be “no stone left unturned” in the quest to make the Epstein files completely transparent.

But it all came to a head during a heated House Oversight Hearing Wednesday, when members of the lower chamber forced the bureau chief to confront the incongruencies between his prior stances and his recent lagging actions.

“This spring, you ordered hundreds of agents to pore over all of the Epstein files, but not to look for more clues about the money network, or the network of human traffickers,” said Representative Jamie Raskin. “You pulled these agents from their regular counterterrorism or drug trafficking duties to work around the clock—some of them sleeping at their desks—to conduct a frantic search to make sure Donald Trump’s name and image were flagged and redacted wherever they appeared.”

Raskin then highlighted a July memo from the bureau, in which Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi determined “no further disclosure” regarding the Epstein files and the FBI’s investigation “would be necessary or appropriate.”

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago

And yet, when Massie goes to vote, he remembers who has their thumb up his bum.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Peter Thiel's name is also in those files, but I get the feeling Ro Kahnna and Massie plan on making an exception for him.

Massie introduced a bill to end the Federal reserve act and replace the U.S. dollar with crypto and gold.

Which is coincidentally also something Peter Thiel has strongly advocated for a long time.

Ro Kahnna has been a Thiel sycophant for nearly a decade.

Now that the Senate seems to be looking into Epstein's ties to Thiel too, it's not clear if this is kayfabe or like a snake eating its own tail. I do know that Kahnna and Massie are corrupt as fuck, and making themselves out to be the good guys. It's sad that the only reason we might even end up seeing some justice served is because it was politically advantageous for them to call it out when they did.

Thiel, Musk, Vance, Massie, Kahnna, and plenty of others have known this whole time, but they chose to stay silent about it until they thought they could use it for leverage. No matter what happens, don't ever forget that when they try to rewrite history.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is Hulk Hogan tied to Epstein too? Things would begin to make a lot of sense if he is.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He was tied to Thiel. Thiel bankrolled his lawsuit that bankrupted Gawker.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Exactly. I never could understand his connection to Thiel. But Epstein would explain that.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Thiel was butt hurt because Gawker outed him.

[–] klemptor@startrek.website 2 points 1 month ago

This is so stupid, but every time I read something about Ro Khanna, my brain thinks it's about Mo Rocca.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trump is primarily protecting himself

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 month ago

I mean, he's his only friend, so you're not wrong

I believe that Trump is trying to protect rich and powerful people who are his friends, and that is why this material is not getting released,” Massie told CNN last week.

So... Close...

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Release the Trump/Epstein files

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

They’re not angry there’s a coverup. They’re angry it’s so unbelievably ham-fisted.