this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
229 points (98.3% liked)

politics

25791 readers
2995 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 98 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Schumer: "Trump is running away from the negotiating table"

Jeffries: "Trump Always Chickens Out"

I cannot emphasize enough what losers these two are. Trump isn't running away from anything, you muppets. He thinks you'll chicken out and pass their budget bill without restrictions because you guys are the ones who always chicken out when there's even a modicum of risk. Schumer was already publicly ruminating on voting for it without getting anything! And here's what the Confederates will do now if you actually shut down the government: they'll increase their demands further and demand you crawl to them apologetically for going against them.

Get out of politics, both of you. Please.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Schumer was already publicly ruminating on voting for it without getting anything!

That's absolutely his style

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago

I figure at some point they'll just stagger what gets shut down, so everyone eventually gets fatigue trying to track if they'll be working and getting paid out of a pool of 50+ different shutdown deadlines with vague descriptions of who is impacted and who isnt.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I don’t get it. A story that is 100% supposed to be a win for democrats. Something that will get liberals working together and motivated. Something that will get republicans unmotivated and tank Trump’s approval ratings even more. Schumer snd Jeffries take the right path in actually shit talking Trump to further antagonize them.

And this is the top comment? To bash the democrats?

[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Let me break it down.

Using their only real leverage to extract some concessions: good.

Messaging like they're desperados in a gunfight with Trump when he barely remembers their names, instead of using the moment to effectively communicate to voters a narrow pro-worker agenda guided by deep principles and not data firm triangulated bullet points: bad.

Publicly talking about giving up before they get anything at all, because they have no spine: bad.

Not publicly talking about doing whatever it takes, and instead trying to approach Trump and radiating weakness the entire time they do it: bad.

Not making Trump send his designated negotiator to come to them, like someone with leverage does: bad.

Inevitably folding before they get anything of substance: bad.


Do you remember when Democrats briefly tried to message to the youths on social media and recorded that terrible "choose your fighter" montage because video games, and all it served to do was communicate how deeply out of touch they are at a Pokemon Go to the polls level? They even roped AOC into it. I'm confident she thought it was a terrible idea but went along with it to make nice and maybe because she was just happy they were trying literally anything. And then it disappeared immediately because of the above and they just gave up completely after that? And now poor 110-year-old Bernie is out there trying to engage with voters practically single handedly, except when AOC joins him, while the animated corpse of Chuck Schumer imagines he's playing 8D chess but coming across like Milton from Office Space.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Bad example, Milton basically won Office Space.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

All those things are bad… in your opinion.

As was the case last time a government shutdown was talked about, Trump wants the shutdown! Using their leverage to shut the government down could be great for Trump and bad down democrats. There is a risk that you are ignoring by saying these things.

Fact is, since the last time the government shutdown was talked, Trump’s approval ratings have absolutely tanked. Would that have happened if Democrats used their power and to get some concession? It’s entirely possible Schumer made the right decision last time to not shut the government down.

Now in this case, Trump has done something that is in no way defensible and democrats should be rallying around shit talking Trump. But instead, we completely ignore Trump’s bullshit and complain about party leaders.

How about instead of complaining about Democrats not using their tiny amount of leverage that very easily could backfire, we instead do something that will hopefully result in Democrats gaining more seats and giving real leverage.

Edit: just to drive the point home, Trump was at -1 according to economists when Schumer decided not to shut the government down in March. He went down to -10 within the month. He’s at -17 today.

If the government was shut down, all bad things would be blamed on democrats and Trump would have his scape goat.

https://www.economist.com/interactive/trump-approval-tracker

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Yes. Russian agent or not, there are many on here doing their work.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

Not exactly. The focus is on those two Democrats. They have consistently failed on this exact issue. Do we really think they'll succeed now? No, we don't... But look, if they make a stand, good for them!

Many of the other Democrats in Congress have a spine, and we respect them more because of it, relatively speaking.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You'd be surprised how many users here were a part of the protest vote against Harris.

[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago

What's the percentage? Since we're guessing, I'd guess most of us did in fact hold our nose and vote for Harris, despite all of our misgivings that she's just another corporate Democrat with no principles, incoherent strategy, and incompetent messaging.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You'd be surprised

I would not be! They probably also protest voted Biden and Clinton and Obama and somehow act like Schumer and Jeffries are the reason why democrats are toothless. And not because these “liberals” are ripping their teeth out.

[–] TarantulaFudge@startrek.website 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I just mentioned some positive facts about Obama on lemmy.ml memes and I got called a Nazi and banned. We got flavors of liberals who hate each other when we need to be working together. It was really strange being called a liberal Nazi.

If we get hung up on every small thing we are never gonna be happy at some point you have to recognize that people have different points of view we can't be alienating people who are on the same team...

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think democrats have a disadvantage over republicans because republicans will rally around their people no matter what. All a republican has to do is say Trump good, radical left bad and they win their party

For better and worse democrats won’t do this. So the democratic politicians have to walk these tight ropes to appeal to people that are so quick to hate them. The net effect of this is democratic politicians losing votes and republicans holding strong.

I think democrats should continue to expect more from their leaders, but in some cases we need to recognize a win and let it be. Why do we need to make this issue about why democrats suck when it is clearly a Trump/Republicans issue?

[–] andthatsalright@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Who cares what the purpose is? The result is going to be feckless leaders being pussies. As long as those two are in charge, we’re done

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Will a shutdown stop the payments to ICE?

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 15 points 1 day ago

I don’t consider them essential.

[–] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 day ago

Will the administration's failure to negotiate lead to even fewer deportations?

[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Can't stop the Gestapo!

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 day ago

Democrats will surprise the hell out of me if they shut down the government. I'm all for it, but no way they actually do something.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Shutting it down will hurt red states the most.

[–] Corelli_III@midwest.social 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i hope they shut down and never fucking come back

maybe they should shut down and see if we let them come back

[–] forrgott@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Pretty sure DOGE obtained illegitimate access to the Treasury. So I bet they want a shutdown. They'll just stop paying the Democrats and act like it's business like usual. I mean, what's stopping them?

Not good but about the only in strategy the left has right now is pissing off his base and pissing off the people that carry out his orders. Stopping paychecks is a pretty good way to do that.

[–] Corelli_III@midwest.social 7 points 1 day ago

if they want to mortally wound the USD and find out what happens i am all for it

[–] MunkysUnkEnz0@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

At the government, shuts down. I doubt that the Republicans will ever open it back up again. That will be the end of it.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Is this a regime worth having be able to function or participating in running? Walk away.