this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
623 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37603 readers
526 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jeze3D@beehaw.org 97 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Too many of you still have meta accounts, quest headsets, and sympathy for a company that can’t/shouldn’t be trusted with anything. They’re the reason for Trump being elected, the erosion of human rights, and many other atrocities on top of being a privacy nightmare. I don’t want them anywhere near the fediverse.

[–] MudMan@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Yeah, I don't know where you're from, but over here if you don't have a Whatsapp account in working order you can't... do things.

I hired a company to wire my house and they won't communicate over anything else. I am in maybe five friends and family groups where every social event in my life is put together. I recently noticed a family member and I didn't have each other's numbers anymore, since we only ever communicate over Whatsapp. At work events people will show you a QR code for Facebook or Whatsapp and expect to receive the same back.

I get that a lot of people, especially in the US, don't notice, but Meta won this fight like a decade ago. I don't like it, but that ship sailed as far away as Amazon dominating online shopping.

[–] Zetaphor@zemmy.cc 10 points 1 year ago

Most people from the US think of the it as the default :/

Currently living in Argentina, if you want to make an appointment with the doctor, plumber, or barber you use Whatsapp. Want to order a pizza without using one of the gig economy ordering apps? You use Whatsapp. Communicating with anyone and everything in this region involves having a Whatsapp account.

[–] azureeight@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (12 children)

I have had independent contractors offer it as an option, but most still have a phone number or have too many customers who aren't tech savvy enough to use something like that. There's really no way a reputable business in my area would survive that way.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Zetaphor@zemmy.cc 15 points 1 year ago

They’re the reason for Trump being elected

Trump was elected because the Electoral College voted for him. Hillary Clinton won the popular vote, AKA the one you participated in. The American populace don't decide the president. Your vote is not you deciding who wins, it's you expressing your opinion in the hopes that the electors your state party officials hand picked will actually listen to the interests of their constituents.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] dark_stang@beehaw.org 81 points 1 year ago (24 children)

Every time a big company gets into an open source space, they try to take it over. Hopefully everybody in the fediverse recognizes that.

[–] Dee_Imaginarium@beehaw.org 23 points 1 year ago

Looks at article.

Yeah, I think they might realize it lol

Happy to see it though, I've been saying they should be defederated right out of the gate ever since I first saw these rumors.

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

It kind of doesn't matter whether everyone in the fediverse recognizes it or not. People around here often forget that they are in the vast minority when it comes to tech literacy in the world. Most people are not interested in the experience that lemmy currently offers, because it's far too complicated and people asking simple questions are often met with scoff and scorn, because the question has been asked before and they should have just searched for an answer or because it's so simple, obviously it's just .

The fact that none of this is approachable to a tech naive person is precisely why microsoft killed OSS in the late 90s, why google killed XMPP, and why it's extremely likely a place like meta or another company might succeed in effectively killing off a platform like activitypub (altho I don't think it'll kill it entirely, I do suspect that they will slowly kill it by bleeding users over to their platforms). You see, what these large brands have is recognition - people who are not tech literate still know what google is, what facebook is (they may not know they've rebranded to meta), and what microsoft is. These companies have the resources to throw actual designers at this space and provide a front end interface that is friendly to just about anyone. Combine good UX design with a company that people recognize and a huge platform from which to advertise to users (imagine logging into facebook and being presented with all the cool new things you can do on the fediverse) and you'll get normal people trickling into the platform.

Here's where things succeed - these platforms will start as open, and so all the normal people will now be able to talk with their tech friends who are also in the fediverse, and slowly these platforms will become monoliths. They'll start curating the experience more as user reports roll in, and as they tighten the reigns. Over time you'll find that you can't reach these users unless you're also on their platform, and your non-tech literate friends will ask you to migrate to their platform so you can continue to interact through the same channels that they've been interacting with you. While you may be unwilling to migrate, some people will be, and slowly but surely the platforms will dominate the space. They might be sunset eventually as a way to kill off the protocol, or they might just simply turn into their own walled garden.

The only way forward I can see which is resistant to attacks of capital of this nature are when an open source protocol actually starts to center design during the development of the platform. You can't just tack a user design expert onto a platform like lemmy and ask them to make things make sense, because federation itself needs a whole new set of terminology, designed by people who understand how non-tech literate people think, and a whole new backend to support a front end that's truly user friendly. But user design is not friendly to github and most developers aren't designers, so this isn't something I see being accomplished anytime soon. The best that can happen right now is for better dev platforms to be designed for front-end and UX designers (something akin to github but useful to designers), to work on implementing these kinds of people from the beginning, and for open source projects to start reaching out more to designers, to start spending donated money on designers, and to center design as an important principle to OSS protocols.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] Mika7150@beehaw.org 55 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't see what there is to gain from this, I don't want mega-corporation in my social media anymore. especially not after what has been happening to their platforms. if their users want to join the fediverse, the account creation process is always open as long as they can follow the rules!

And of course there's always the fact that their end goal will not be good for any of us, no matter what it is there is a 0% chance our interests align

[–] diablexical@vlemmy.net 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What do you think the odds are this platform was put together with react?

Edit: have a better informed opinion after reading this ariticle. Support every instance that doesn’t federate with them, shun those that do.

[–] DataDecay@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I remember Microsoft's dismantling (knee capping) of libre office, and enjoyed the read on XXMP. How quickly people forget the past or think they are different to withstand monopolies cutthroat strategies.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thalestr@beehaw.org 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good! Meta has proven time and time again that them and their services are not to be trusted. Deplatforming that trashfire before it even starts is a smart move.

[–] MudMan@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm going to assume you misspoke there, but the notion of fediverse instances "deplatforming" Meta is... quite the notion.

Defederating from Meta is not so much "deplatforming" them, as refusing to be in their platform.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 45 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yea I mean, I don't think anyone could actually believe that Meta is acting in good faith here, or even capable of acting in good faith in general. As much as it's exciting to think about plugging a billion new users into the Fediverse, it would no doubt be done in a way designed to enrich Meta at our expense.

[–] lemmyngsadmin@lemmyngs.social 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Embrace, extend, extinguish.

Surprised actually they beat Microsoft to the punch

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Southrydge@vlemmy.net 44 points 1 year ago

Meta is that annoying little sibling that wants to be a part of everything when nobody wants them around. Except instead of a sibling, it's more of a disease.

[–] takeda@beehaw.org 42 points 1 year ago

Yes, please. We can't expect anything good coming from them.

Last time we were burned (or at least I am aware of) was with Jabber and Google Talk.

It helped them bootstrap their instant messaging, and once everyone was using it they simply blocked access.

It is pretty much guaranteed that Facebook will do the same thing.

[–] LordChaos82@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

A simple solution would be to ask Meta to opensource Facebook, WhatApp, Instagram and whatever their federated instance would be called code and in return, they can federate with the fediverse. I think that will show their true intentions on how much love they have for the opensource community. Put the ball in their court and if they agree, they will be welcomed to the fediverse as good faith actors.

Just my 2 cents.

[–] mobyduck648@beehaw.org 43 points 1 year ago

This is still a ‘frog and the scorpion’ kind of situation I think, Meta is fundamentally predatory and incapable of good faith as a matter of collective psychology and culture. They’re a direct analogue of Big Tobacco and should be as welcome in the Fediverse as a diagnosis of the Ebola virus in my opinion.

[–] Kronk@beehaw.org 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

welcomed... as good faith actors

Haha! I will never see Meta as a good faith actor on the internet

[–] z3k3lon@lemmy.pt 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry but there is no way that Meta has good intentions...

[–] dmegatool@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

... has good intention to make money.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tangentism@beehaw.org 16 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Saw this elsewhere

oh, here's some JUICY rumored details about meta's plans for the fediverse

tl;dr "Meta will only federate with select larger instances from the beginning. There will be contracts which also provide for financial compensation for the instance owners."

can't entirely verify their validity but it's still worth posting just in case

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 28 points 1 year ago

Don't want any lizard cage fighting sociopath in my Lemmy thanks.

[–] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why doesn't the article write about the actual threat to the fediverse? Embrace extend extinguish is such a common tactic it's hard to imagine this isn't what Facebook is doing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AuroraRose@beehaw.org 24 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Okay, someone explain to me cus i apparently don't have the critical thinking skills to figure it out on my own.

What does Meta want from joining the fediverse? What is the draw for them???

[–] Snapz@beehaw.org 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This was a very illuminating view from another post

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GameGod@beehaw.org 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a business strategy called embrace, extend, extinguish that they'll try to use to snuff out the fediverse.

[–] nix@midwest.social 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)

They'll make a bespoke federated service, collect all the data of their users (and all the people on other networks their users interact with), make it all shiny and fancy and add a ton of improvements most networks don't have yet. And if they can reach a critical mass of users, they can track a huge cross section of federated activity, and force networks to play by their rules or lose access to their entire userbase. It's the same thing google did to email.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] altz3r0@beehaw.org 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think the plan should be bracing for impact, and how to deal with the after-effect. Because let's be honest, we are in a late stage capitalism, and Meta megacorp will get what it wants.

I don't currently see it spilling it's poison to Lemmy/kbin. I'm hopeful rather, but I may be misunderstanding how the fediverse works.

But for mastodon, I would say the outcome is a segregation, as it's safe to assume that communities that integrate wirh Meta will be consumed. Unfortunately that likely means starting from scratch, with a even nichier community, as far as I can see. Not exactly from nothing, but content loss will be inevitable, which is the Fediverse greatest weakness imho.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] unfnknblvbl@beehaw.org 22 points 1 year ago

How weird would it be if all those "I do not give Facebook permission to blah blah rights blah" posts/statements actually did have legal weight in the Fediverse?

[–] luckystarr@feddit.de 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Once federated with Meta, not only "valid Meta users" would join the network, but also bots which would nudge the users, influencing the narrative.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PenguinJuice@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

Bro fuuuuuuck that company. That company is the definition of evil. As if dividing our country and selling off all our private data wasn't bad enough for them.

[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 year ago

Agree--keep off. Meta can just build their own Twitter.

[–] RandoCalrandian@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Just because they are bribing us to let the torjan horse in doesn't mean we should or have to

[–] doophy@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let them! There's nothing saying other instances have to federate with them. Kind of the beauty of the whole thing, really.

[–] chamim@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Not exactly. What Facebook is expected to attempt here is an embrace, extend and extinguish strategy.

[–] Dee_Imaginarium@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago (6 children)

That only works if we care about the bells and whistles they add. Nobody here does or else we'd still be on those platforms. That strategy just doesn't work with a federated network that doesn't connect to your instance.

They'll have their own instance with bells and whistles that nobody connects to and we'll have our federated network. It'll be exactly like the current structure but they'll have an instance instead of a dedicated platform.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You can defederate from their server, but if they "embrace, extend, extinguish" the ActivityPub specification, then the game is over just as well.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›