this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
455 points (99.6% liked)

Android

31973 readers
393 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.ml


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

The USA with its corporations setting a new, unbeatable WR in any% glitchless turning into a dictatorship with zero human rights or freedoms.

[–] Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu 123 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Disclaimer: I have been a maintainer for LineageOS and a long time user.

Whoever advocates for LineageOS don't get it. Using LineageOS will not fix any issue like this.

Already today using LineageOS means give up on banking apps, ID apps, and even McDonald's and some games like Pokemon.

Yeah because Google with play intergrity now demands valid keys that gets invalidated as soon Google detect they are used for such usage. The cat and mouse game suddenly got much harder to beat.

So no, using LineageOS will soon be possible only with secondary devices and not your primary that you will need for your actual stuff to work.

[–] Eagle0110@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly, trying to find software alternative for what ultimately going to be locked down hardware is never going to be a sustainable solution.

Alternative OS means nothing if there's no widely supported open hardware with unlocked bootloader to run such OS long term, and Google is got all mainstream phone manufactures cornered legally and commercially with this and their requirement for manufecturer authorization for shipping GMS suite with their products.

The only way out is this ridiculous decision of Google getting push backs from legislation, because there's nothing manufecturers can do and without them there's nothing FOSS developers can do to push back long term, and Google isn't stopping themselves from doing Evil™.

[–] Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu 1 points 19 hours ago

Fully agree

[–] splendoruranium@infosec.pub 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Already today using LineageOS means give up on banking apps, ID apps, and even McDonald’s and some games like Pokemon.

Yeah because Google with play intergrity now demands valid keys that gets invalidated as soon Google detect they are used for such usage. The cat and mouse game suddenly got much harder to beat.

But if I'm already using LineageOS without GApps, this wouldn't make any difference, right?

Edit: Also - thanks for all your work!

[–] Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

And soon you will need a second device with locked down bootloader and play integrity to use mainstream apps.

What when meta will require attestation to run WhatsApp? Not if, when...

[–] splendoruranium@infosec.pub 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I agree that those things are going to happen, but again, I'm deliberately not using GApps and thus no Playstore apps, including WA. Using an undesirable product is a vote for the continued existence of that product, so the only winning move is not to play, isn't it? 🤷

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Counterpoint: I use the McDonald's app where it belongs - on a giant greasy ordering kiosk.

But seriously, banks have websites. Everyone and everything has a website.

I don't need Android apps at the cost of my privacy or at the cost of control of my devices.

I use GrapheneOS as my only phone, and I have done so for years.

Whatever the topic, I don't need an app for that.

[–] hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de 59 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I don’t know about the US but on this side of the pond banks have their own 2nd factor apps. So to log in to a bank’s website you need an app - quite probably with play integrity.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 hours ago

Dang. Y'all need to pick better credit unions. MFA rolling token is an open standard. Any single app can support all of my (correctly implemented) tokens. I prefer Aegis, but they (correctly implemented MFA apps) all work.

I don't want to trust my money to someone who can't implement standards compliant MFA.

That would scare the daylights out of me.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 14 hours ago

That sounds extremely inconvenient. Individual apps for 2FA? No thanks. I'm good with KeePass and Aegis, both open source, encrypted, and don't require any extra hardware.

In America, we're lucky if our bank supports 2fa, let alone require an app for it

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

That's insane, I have never heard of such a thing, but I'm in the US where most banks don't even have non-sms second factor.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Counter-counterpoint:

Banks use their app to generate the otp and they reinvented the wheel so if you want to login you need to install it, can't use a generic authenticator. I am not aware of any single bank in the EU that allows the use of generic authenticators.

For McDonald's, using the app gives at least 50% off. A menu in the app costs 5 euro while on the store kiosk costs 12 euro. I do not personally care because I find their food to be just barely edible, but I understand why there's a need to install the app

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Qwel@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've never had an issue with the three banking apps I tried on LineageOS, and I didn't even know there was a McDonald's app or pokemon games.

If this list for /e/os roughly applies to LineageOS (with microG), I wouldn't call it "only for secondary devices", more "won't work for some people"

Did I miss something? AFAIK google is requiring devs to ID, not to use SafetyNet or whatever the "only-runs-on-certified-phones" thing is called

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Same, my bank also doesn't require strict play integrity. I think I ran into an issue with a dating app once, but that's about it, and that's no real loss.

If my bank would suddenly stop working on Android with microG (with no simple alternative), I'd just switch to another bank, there are enough.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] furycd001@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago

The only apps I have installed from the play store are ones that came pre-installed with the phone. The rest are all from f-droid....

LONG LIVE F-DROID ! !

[–] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 day ago

Fdroid is just the best. Around half of the apps on my phone are from Fdroid and Izzy.

[–] Ambiance6195@lemmy.dbzer0.com 97 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Fucking google at it again. Straight up turning into apple.

[–] CrayonDevourer@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You can blame the courts for this one. They basically ruled "Apple isn't a monopoly, because they don't even LET other people compete in the first place". (which is about a bass-ackwards as it gets but whatever)

Google saw this and went "shit..." so they're rushing to implement the same thing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago

DOWN WITH GOOGLE

DOWN WITH GOOGLE

DOWN WITH GOOGLE

...

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

really hope someone finds a way to break google's block on apks that aren't registered. with more and more manufacturers locking down bootloaders, changing roms is no longer an option.

[–] definitemaybe@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Except that it is still an option to only buy phones that allow bootloader unlocking and root? That's been a requirement for me since my first smartphone.

[–] jnod4@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where can I find a list of such phones?

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

On the respective ROM websites:

https://wiki.lineageos.org/devices/

https://doc.e.foundation/devices

and whatever else ROM you'd like.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world -1 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I imagine I'm gonna get downvoted for this, but I have no idea what F-Droid is.

[–] hobbsc@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 19 hours ago

i don't know why people would but it appears as if they already have. f-droid is a catalogue of FOSS apps for android. sort of like an alternative app "store" (but there is no purchasing).

https://f-droid.org/

[–] waldo_was_here@piefed.social 0 points 15 hours ago

Google fdroid or use chatgpt

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why the Google identity check is completely useless:

Step 1: scammer acquires stolen id card

What's the difference between malware developed anonymously and malware developed anonymously but registered under a fake id? It can be installed today and it can be installed tomorrow. Do they really believe that malware developers will doxx themselves when publishing their malware?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Auth@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Google can do this for own their own store first. I doubt it will make any difference in the number of malicious and shit apps on that store. Requiring this be mandatory for everyone is clearly malicious.

[–] KuroiKaze@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

I feel like you don't really know anything about the scam community, but a side loaded app is like 500 times more likely to be malware than a Play store app. The amount of millions that have been stolen from users in India, Mexico, Africa, and Brazil because of sideloaded apps is pretty staggering.

I'm fairly certain fdroid should just be able to alter the way that they're doing things a bit and still exist under the need to obtain a signing cert from Google.

I mean personally I'm not on the same side with this. I would rather Google not do this without some way to disable it via the UI given enough warnings and what not.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 33 points 2 days ago (24 children)

When Android stops working properly, I'll move back to a dumb/feature phone. My wife will hate it, but so be it.

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I hear you. My wife has also requested that I not deprecate certain proprietary apps until I can provide a good alternative that works on both Android and Apple. Last time was when we were traveling and wanted to share locations with each other in real time. I had to give WhatsApp location perms 🤮

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 20 hours ago

Oh, I hear you there. I've had to give persistent location data to GMaps of all things, because she uses Apple and actually wanted me to get one of those devices just for location.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] kjo@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Looks like I'm searching for a device that can run LineageOS, then.

🤗

[–] passenger@sopuli.xyz 54 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (15 children)

If this comes to pass, f-droid might get closed as the userbase dwindles. Many apps will also cease to be developed and be left without updates. You will not get out with just updating to LineageOS. We should be looking at Linux phones at that point.

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Linux Phones have a few software hurdles to pass through to get usable.

The biggest problem right now is adoption and contribution to the ecosystem, but there's a few things in the way of outright using Linux apps on a phone. One is that most Linux apps aren't made to be verical. Some newer ones can adapt to it, but many of the apps you likely would depend on using a Linux laptop are almost unusable on a Linux phone, like... vlc, for instance.

The network stack isn't as beaten to death for 4G and 5G as Android's is. I work in a slightly iffy area, and on Android I'd have times where I'd lose signal, but it would always come back within 5-10 minutes or so. There'd be times on Linux when it wouldn't until I'd missed two calls and three texts and an hour and a half had gone by because the system was choking on a comma or a misplaced semicolon it found somewhere in the background and wouldn't reset until I forced airplane mode off and on. If I was at home, or in the city, I'd never notice this problem, but the second I hit a road trip or went to work, boy.

Also, and this is just my phone, my OP6T had iffy microphone and earpiece settings. Pulse Audio was at the forefront of this audio stack almost entirely unchanged from its appearance on gnome or kde and on a phone it's just confusing and obtuse as to what app is using what and what even is what. If you got it right, it was fine, then the next call it wouldn't be, or would change back, again, probably more the 6T being a 6T than anything else.

I think right now, in this interim period, I'm going to buy a hotspot that I can just slip a sim card into and tether a Linux phone to it. I can use Conversations on Waydroid and use JMP.chat to send phone calls and texts over XMPP. I did fine on my OP6T for my actual use of a phone. I was browsin', I was textin', I was sendin' messages, I was doin' terminal stuff, administratin' my servers, readin', listening to musicn'. It was fine. Will do some experimenting.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] ohellidk@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago

Still using LOS, haven't looked back...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MudMan@fedia.io 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I'm confused by this:

The F-Droid project cannot require that developers register their apps through Google, but at the same time, we cannot “take over” the application identifiers for the open-source apps we distribute, as that would effectively seize exclusive distribution rights to those applications.

If it were to be put into effect, the developer registration decree will end the F-Droid project and other free/open-source app distribution sources as we know them today, and the world will be deprived of the safety and security of the catalog of thousands of apps that can be trusted and verified by any and all. F-Droid’s myriad users5 will be left adrift, with no means to install — or even update their existing installed — applications.

My understanding is that developers need to sign up with Google and once they have an account they can sign their own apks.

How would this impact F-Droid in any way? Presumably by the time F-Droid enters the picture the developers of the apps they distribute would have already gone through that entire process, right? The apks will be tied to that new Google certificate, but after that they can still be distributed anywhere.

I mean, don't get me wrong, this has genuine, very serious, dealbreaking issues, in that Google can just cancel the account of a developer making apps they don't like, the same way Apple has done in the past. That's not great. But from F-Droid's perspective all of that has happened upstream, they are not anywhere in that loop, unless I've misunderstood the changes.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 61 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

How would this impact F-Droid in any way?

F-Droid itself builds the APKs to ensure that they're reproducible and not signed on a development machine that could be compromised.

https://f-droid.org/en/docs/FAQ_-_General/#is-your-building-and-signing-process-secure

With these changes, either:

  • They use Google's developer identity process to sign every APK they build with their own developer identity, which Google is likely not going to allow or is going to quickly find an example of a "malicious" app so they can blacklist all of them; or
  • They stop building APKs and just trust the developer provides a non-malicious, pre-verified APK;
  • They find a way to mediate the process between the original developer and Google. Knowing Google, they would make it as needlessly painful for everyone involved to discourage and punish alternative app stores.
[–] MudMan@fedia.io 13 points 2 days ago

Oooh, gotcha. That makes sense.

I guess it'd make sense to take that first option as far as it will go, at which point the issue becomes litigating this the first time Google has their own weird censorship issue in the Apple mold. I'd expect if they ban all of F-Droid explicitly that would at least make more ripples than going after a single torrent client app or whatever. It may play out different from a regulatory perspective, too, if the practical effect is they ban third party stores.

Side note, I'm really mad at the very deliberate choice Google made of categorizing all potential apps as either "apps meant for Google Play" or "student or hobbyist apps". You know they know why that's wrong, but it still makes you want to explain it to them.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›