this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
58 points (100.0% liked)

Games

21531 readers
467 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

REDWOOD CITY, Calif. Electronic Arts Inc. (NASDAQ: EA) (“EA” or the “Company”), a global leader in interactive entertainment, today announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to be acquired by an investor consortium (“the Consortium”) comprised of PIF, Silver Lake, and Affinity Partners in an all-cash transaction that values EA at an enterprise value of approximately $55 billion. The transaction positions EA to accelerate innovation and growth to build the future of entertainment.

Under the terms of the agreement, the Consortium will acquire 100% of EA, with PIF rolling over its existing 9.9% stake in the Company. EA stockholders will receive $210 per share in cash. The per share purchase price represents a 25% premium to EA’s unaffected share price of $168.32 at market close on September 25, 2025, the last fully unaffected trading day, and a premium to EA’s unaffected all-time high of $179.01 at market close on August 14, 2025.

[...]

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Wait Saudi Arabia owns the Sims now?

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 22 hours ago

The Sims: Wahhabi Pack. Mandatory DLC featuring burqas, public executions, and owning US politicians.

[–] inlandempire@jlai.lu 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You thought EA was shit before? Just wait and see what they have in store...

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

You thought EA was shit before?

Yes. I already gave up on EA games, so I guess all that is left is grabbing some popcorn to watch it get worse.🍿

[–] wurstgulasch3000@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As someone wrote in another thread: it's not like I could give them less money

Most or their games aren't even worth pirating and the idea of a Saudi sanctioned call of duty seems funny to me so let's see where this goes

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

If by COD you mean Battlefield, then yeah.

[–] wurstgulasch3000@feddit.org 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I mixed it up with the other publisher that churns out yearly games I don't buy

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Centennial Turd Shooter Of The Year ™

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Call of Duty is Activison, not EA, EA is The Sims

[–] wurstgulasch3000@feddit.org 1 points 16 hours ago

Oh man, you're right. Maybe battlefield then?

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not gonna lie, "The Consortium" would be the perfect name for the evil organisation in some kind of game or movie.

[–] Sophocles@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 2 hours ago

Of course somebody already used it...

[–] DrMartinu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago

EA did 9/11

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Does EA need to become privately owned? I mean, it does "OK" financially and the acquisition being done with the help of a 20 billion loan will surely put pressure onto the company to increase profits, most likely at the expense of developers who are already spread thin (see reported BF6 development woes)

[–] moody@lemmings.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Generally speaking, a privately-owned company doesn't have the same incentives to maximize profits at all costs since there are no public shareholders to benefit. However, one doesn't buy a company significantly above its current valuation to lower its profits.

Also what's important here is who's going to own it, and it's a pretty controversial group.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

PE is all about that cash, but they have ways of making money that don't involve strong fundamentals. Direct private ownership, such as with Valve, aligns the owners interests with their customers much more closely.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 3 points 1 day ago

And often comes with a focus on long-term company health rather than short term stock performance.

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh yes, I did not mean to undermine the worrisome aspect of the new owners, I just struggle to understand why EA would agree to the financial operation in the first place.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 7 points 1 day ago

Cashing out with a 25% bonus on your stock, well above it's highest point ever, sounds like a pretty significant sway.