this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
123 points (93.0% liked)

linuxmemes

21255 readers
1869 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    all 23 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] ace@lemmy.ananace.dev 46 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    People love to complain about CMake, often with valid complaints as well. But it - to this day - remains the only build system where I'll actually trust a project when they say they are cross-platform.

    Being the Windows maintainer for OpenMW, it used to be absolute hell back a decade and half ago when an indirect dependency changed - and used something like SCons or Premake while claiming to be "cross-platform", used to be that I had to write my own build solutions for Windows since it was all hardcoded against Linux paths and libraries.

    CMake might not be the coolest, most hip, build system, but it delivers on actually letting you build your software regardless of platform. So it remains my go-to for whenever I need to actually build something that's supposed to be used.
    For personal things I still often hack together a couple of Makefiles though, it's just a lot faster to do.

    [–] uis@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

    CMake and meson aren't build systems, they are generators. If you want to use Ninja, just add -G Ninja.

    [–] AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago

    Cross platform

    (*As long as your platform isn't shite)

    [–] rostby@lemmy.fmhy.net 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Wasn’t WSL supposed to solve this problem

    [–] ace@lemmy.ananace.dev 2 points 11 months ago

    Not really, WSL seems like it was mainly supposed to stop people leaping ship to be able to develop Node without the horribly painful Windows JS experience. And wouldn't you know it, Microsoft has been making their own JavaScript language in Typescript.

    [–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 38 points 11 months ago

    CMake has been around forever and is flexible enough to build really complex software. You just need to pull out enough hair when you want it to do something.

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 31 points 11 months ago

    I'll just use make

    [–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 11 months ago

    One of these is not like the others (and it's not CMake).

    Also, the syntax is absolutely mental but I like CMake :V

    [–] mvirts@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    I ❤️ cmake

    Probably because I've never developed with ninja or meson 😹

    [–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 11 months ago

    Cmake can generate ninja.

    Dunno why they picked on cmake when autotools exists!

    [–] spacesweedkid27@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    I fucking hate building tools or package managers like maven because I am too lazy too learn on how to use them.

    Not at all are they intentional.

    I will just copy the source or some precompiled library from a git and embedd in my project. Try and stop me.

    [–] 0x4E4F@infosec.pub 7 points 11 months ago

    Meeh, if it works 🤷.

    [–] uis@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Why you compile build system with build file generators?

    [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    If you're compiling something huge like Chrome, having a separate compilation stage for the build files makes sense. For a normal sized project it's overkill.

    [–] uis@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

    Meson does the same...

    [–] Uriah@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    I'm growing fond of xmake.

    Simple language, simple buildscripts.

    [–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    And everyone checking out your code is like „what the fuck is this?”.

    [–] Uriah@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago

    But it works and the language is well known!

    Join the dark side; there are dozens of us!

    i thought this was a fortnight meme XD

    [–] gon@lemm.ee -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
    [–] b3an@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)
    [–] BlackRing@midwest.social 3 points 11 months ago

    I mean... Maybe they saw 'C'make' and then realized.