this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
536 points (93.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9628 readers
581 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 111 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (20 children)

Car brains are out in force for this thread, lol.

Apparently, if you can't transit products by car or truck, directly to the front-door of every business, the city will collapse.

[–] Naich@kbin.social 67 points 11 months ago (17 children)

That there are cities that have actually done this doesn't seem to stop them insisting it's impossible.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Something I think is sort of ironic is that in my neighborhood most of the last mile delivery happens on bike. This isn't because of a lack of automobile infrastructure but because there are too many automobiles. Nowhere to park or even idle the van for a short time.

I do also suspect it's more convenient for the delivery person to hop off a bike at each stop than it would be to park a car and get out etc.

If I were a city planner I'd integrate that system into my strategy. Ripping out every road is of course hyperbole and clickbait, but ripping out every other road seems like a no brainer. But I seriously doubt converting 3/4 or more of the roads for autos into pedestrian/bike/tram/greenspace would shake things up too bad. Just make sure to keep main arteries open for automobiles and ensure there's centralized parking garages (street parking is a blight) within a decent walking distance and I think people who need to have a car in the city will get used to it fast.

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Hey so I come from a european city from 778, with most of the streets having been the same for over 500 years now.

Heineken truck drivers manage to supply bars and restaurants throughout the city with little to no problems and most of that is pedestrian zoning with exceptions for deliveries and it works quite well.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 months ago

These people also forget that "delivery trucks allowed" is common. Cutting out 95% of cars and leaving delivery vehicles is fine.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] HaggierRapscallier@feddit.nl 38 points 11 months ago

Gentle reminder: This site is basically a tabloid at this point and should not be used as a serious source. If you have to, at least use an archived version.

[–] DarkMessiah@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago (22 children)

Not a horrible idea if you have solid, simple, and actionable plans to replace them with robust, simple, and effective public transport options. Otherwise… yeah, a bit too far.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Nimby crash course, vocabulary edition!

Roads in the 21st century incarnation of English almost always refer specifically to car infrastructure.

Streets are not the same as roads, it describes the space between two rows of properties. Modern streets typically contain a road for cars, but also sidewalks, trees, gardens, lounge spaces, etc. There's a reason it's called street food and not road food, because they're selling on the streets and not in the middle of the roads where they'll get run over.

Every time something like this gets brought up, you always get Nimbys screeching how this will evict everyone from their homes or whatever, and I think it's because they think removing roads means also removing the streets themselves, when in reality it means the streets get restored and become much more welcoming and people friendly.

[–] curiousPJ@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wow, post is getting a lot of traction. Wish some of the actual actionable ones had the same level of activity

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

At this point, I'd settle for taking the 2-lane road segments in my town that turn into 4-lane nightmares and then merge back into 2-lane streets a dozen blocks later with bike lanes and parking, and getting rid of the 4-lane parts that often don't have sidewalks or bike infra.

Sure, these road segments funnel traffic away from the more-residential city grid streets, but they're also rife with speeding and they make it hard to navigate on a bike unless you happen to know which streets have any sort of infra

load more comments
view more: next ›