this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
46 points (97.9% liked)

Electric Vehicles

1735 readers
126 users here now

Overview:

Electric Vehicles are a key part of our tomorrow and how we get there. If we can get all the fossil fuel vehicles off our roads, out of our seas and out of our skies, we'll have a much better environment. This community is where we discuss the various different vehicles and news stories regarding electric transportation.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
sabreW4K3@slrpnk.net
sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
Sunshine@piefed.ca
46
It’s back! The 2027 Chevy Bolt gets an all-new LFP battery, but what else? (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 day ago by ThorrJo@lemmy.sdf.org to c/electricvehicles@slrpnk.net
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No CarPlay and preview specs seem to be aligned more closely with the old standard model than the premium.

Does it have a heat pump?

But if they keep the price at a reasonable level they might sell a few. Faster charging is a big upgrade; the old one topped out at 55kw so it’s getting close to an hour wait at a charger along a road trip, which probably isn’t in a place that’s exactly well stocked with attractions to visit.

Wonder how it will stack up to the new Leaf. I think it’s got proper battery temperature management which was a blocker for some people and earned it a reputstion of being unreliable.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They had CarPlay/AA on the old models. GM has just removed it from all vehicles so they can sell you subscriptions.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yeah that’s my point - it’s a bit hard to see the value in replacing one, if you have it, unless the fast charging is important to you.

But for new buyers, it’s a bit of a problem. CarPlay is a huge deal for me.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

It is, absolutely. If I were buying today it would definitely be Kia/Hyundai models. They seem to be doing all the innovating at this point.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Carplay certification is expensive, or so I hear from people who should know. I can't blame manufactures for not wanting to pay that price. (The people I know who should know are under NDA and so ask they remain anonymous)

[–] artyom@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago

It's a pittance compared to it's value. If that were the reason, they would still include AA, but they don't.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I do wish we’d go back to lower belt lines on cars. They look so dumpy.

[–] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

100% agreed. It's autobesity. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills when I see people who think the new Ariya looks good. These things all just look bloated, lumpy, and sluggish.

I don't think the new Bolt (EUV) is as bad as a lot of new vehicles, mostly because the hood isn't as insanely over the top, but it's still a lot lumpier and chunkier than the regular old Bolt EV.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I’m not certain but I believe it’s for crash protection on the sides and the high flat front is ostensibly for pedestrian protection.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

High fronts are not safer for pedestrians. The car hits their abdomen and chest and pushes them under the car instead of onto the hood.

My Volvo has a low, long hood with a padded engine cover and is among the best for pedestrian crashes.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Here’s an example of what I’m talking about, but while you may be correct that height has nothing to do with it, there’s definitely an increase in front height. They lost the bumper and made the transition to the bonnet much smoother.

Volvo of course did it 10 years prior

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Okay, I see it now. (Though I still don’t like the mk8’s styling.)

If only people would stomach roll cages inside the cabin maybe we’d get cool cars again.

[–] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The side crash protection should be solved by banning the roaming walls of death on the front of giant lifted pickups, not forcing an arms race until everything looks like an MRAP.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 12 hours ago

We all hate tall trucks used for the school run, but really, that’s got very little to do with a raised belt line for side impact protection.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Not much range improvement, if any.

[–] bolapara@lemmy.ml 1 points 19 hours ago

Well, it's an LFP battery which means you can charge it to 100% every day if you want and it won't degrade quickly like the previous generation's battery would if you did that. I charge mine to 70% and it shows about 170mi of range so this would be an improvement in that way.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Triple the charge rate though. I think the OG Bolt was limited to 50kW

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes it is 50 on the original Bolt.

50 is great on the old SparkEV as it has a small but well over-provisioned battery that charges at full rate until nearly done (where most taper off significantly), giving it a C3 rate meaning 2O minutes to full. Not so much for the Bolt.

Interesting to see the torque figures. The SparkEV had way too much torque (the tires and steering can't handle so much oomph!) but the new Bolt comes with a chain and anchor.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

The SparkEV had way too much torque (the tires and steering can't handle so much oomph!)

This is one of the things I hated about my Bolt, aside from the seats and the charging. Most everything else I liked a lot. You could even get extra Regen by throwing the car in reverse while descending down a mountain.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Excellent point.

[–] Steve 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Does it need more range?
Still well over 200miles.
And there are new chargers being built every day.

[–] BromSwolligans@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sucks to see CarPlay go and we know why they did it, but I love the Bolt EUV, and it's good that there will continue to be an affordable option for folks still interested in EVs in this bizarre political moment. I think the new model looks pretty attractive, too, although the outgoing 2022-2023 models of EV and EUV were both pretty attractive as well, for being boring little family hatches.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I like the smaller bolt, so I guess I’ll be passing on this one.

I’ve read that drum brakes are cheaper and work just as well on an EV. I wonder why GM hasn’t reintroduced them as a cost saving measure. I’d also like to see a manual parking brake make a comeback.

Anyone know if this one has a shifter, or is it still using the push button D/L/R/P?