this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
474 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

76071 readers
2558 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If 4chan continues to ignore Ofcom, the forum could be blocked in the UK. And 4chan could face even bigger fines totaling about $23 million or 10 percent of 4chan’s worldwide turnover, whichever is higher. 4chan also faces potential arrest and/or "imprisonment for a term of up to two years," the lawsuit said.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago

4chan can be the first website blocked by the great firewalls of British cooking. potatoes and boiled cocks. not bad if im honest

[–] nuxi@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago

4chan's actual legal response to this can be summarized as "We are incorporated in Delaware which has not been subject to UK law since 1783. See the Treaty of Paris".

[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Offcom has been drinking, came home in a blackout and committed domestic abuse of 4chan. Does Offcom even internet? Alternative plot twist, Offcom is trolling 4chan.

I wanna say that Offcom is doing a good job and trying to protect British people in good faith but I feel like they are being used as a cudgel by the British ruling class to advance an anachronistic agenda. Don't forget, they fired their expert drugs advisor for telling them that MDMA is comparable to horse riding in terms of safety. They want certain things to be true, regardless of the scientific accuracy.

[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Non-British here. There’s a telecom company that called itself “OFFcom”?

[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

It's ofcom but my phone desperately wants it to be Offcom for some reason

[–] gallopingsnail@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

It's Ofcom, the Office of Communications. Not sure how they managed to get it wrong 4 times.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

they don't have that kind of money they can't pay that shit are you nuts

[–] nagaram@startrek.website 2 points 15 hours ago

Probably why they didn't do it in the first place.

They barely pay for moderation. Who is going to pay for that survey? And also why would they? Obviously most of the people on that site are under 18. That's when I used it.

What other demographic clicks the horny ads they run?

[–] Balldowern@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

Should Ofcom be labelled as a terrorist organisation ?

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 113 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

British government fines an American company, based in America, for serving data from American servers that was compliant with American law.

This whole law is complete overreach. It's like banning a book and then getting mad at the author when one of your citizens buys one on holiday and brings it back with them

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Salman Rushdie: First time?

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I think Iran should fine the UK just as much for allowing the Satanic verses to be sold since that novel are banned in Iran.

Any argument they give is the same argument why the 4chan shit is laughable.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This censorship shit is out of control.

Damn fucking straight. I hope it starts an privacy movement so big they realize that all the laws passed since 2000 against terrorism were abject failures and repeal all of them.

Canada is trying to pass major surveillance shit on par with the patriot act on steroids and effectively nullify the need for warrants, all in the name of 'strong borders' and anti terrorism even though it literally gives many US owned and operated companies full and complete access to digital information on Canadians, ironically weakening borders in every way.

And for what? What is the terrorism threat? Al-Qaeda was a always a joke, and the fact that 9/11 happened was far more due to a monumental failure of all intelligence services combined and not due to a lack of resources. Terrorist schemes have been thwarted in the past without the need for extensive surveillance... and most plots are still thwarted primarily by informants and insiders speaking to authorities. The whole 'we need to be super proactive ' has yielded shit results.

Most of the stuff that they claim was 'prevented proactively ' was literally entrapment. They found some mentally ill and/or lonely people who would have done nothing on their own, but ended up being goaded into stupid crap when undercover agents flirted with them, encouraged them, and even offered weapons and explosives for them to use, and if they agreed... well, that's when they nabbed them. No terrorism would have occurred if agents didn't do shit.

Have you ever wondered why so many people are highly distrustful of people talking about doing violent shit? Fed posting? Its because agents have such a long ass history of doing that that you cannot tell who is and who isn't a Fed.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

Will the notorious hacker known as 4chan finally get his comeuppance?

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

4chan also faces potential arrest and/or "imprisonment for a term of up to two years," the lawsuit said.

I wanna see how a website would be sent to jail.

[–] biggeoff@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Clearly they're after the notorious hacker known as 4chan

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Cybersteel@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They could go after the owner. I believe he lives in Japan, all the UK has to do is send an extradition request to the Japanese government, bing bang boom all done.

Which they would laugh at. Even the Chinese government would laugh at such a request. It isn't something that is considered universally a crime, like robbery and murder, but the type of shit they are asking for is so fucking unprecedented and unreasonable it's stupid.

It would be like if the UK demanded that France immediately extradite all legal handgun owners in France (where handguns are legal) because it is a crime to possess one in Great Britain and therefore they are criminals. Makes no sense.

[–] sleen@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

I see you never downloaded a car before.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 123 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (13 children)

This is a case of stupid laws that still don't understand the internet (35+ years in to wide use, mofos)

If an http GET request initiated from country A traverses routers and wires around the globe to grab some data from a server in country B, then we have to accept that the owners of the server are not "operating in country A" and in fact the user in country A is responsible for import.

If some laws in country A have a problem with this, then they should unplug their internet wires at the border, or at least learn how to use them and/or govern their citizens.

All that is tongue in cheek to say they can fuck right off.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Yeah it's a stupid law and they were told it wouldn't work by industry experts. But the politicians that were in power when all this was first been decided were Conservatives and therefore arrogant and of the opinion that if they don't like something, it's realities responsibility to reconfigure itself.

Then Labour got in and for some reason implemented the stupid law anyway despite having heard none of the consultations, and of course now it turns out that the consultations told them not to do it. Now I'm sure the industry experts would have been ignored anyway but Labour look really daft now.

They have basically accepted that this law is unworkable and is basically going to be ignored by everyone, but they still have to go through all of the pantomime of trying to enforce it. I'm sure eventually they'll quietly kill it because the whole thing has been such an embarrassment for them.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (10 children)

If some laws in country A have a problem with this, then they should unplug their internet wires at the border, or at least learn how to use them and/or govern their citizens.

What used to be called The Great Firewall of China. It used to be unthinkable for western countries.

You can't blame this on old people. This is only happening now that the Boomers are on the way out. People who sent international letters or made international phone calls were aware that they were communicating with a different country with different laws. I think we are seeing this now, because now we have people who experience the internet as something happening on their own phone, at their location.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] nevemsenki@lemmy.world 111 points 2 days ago (18 children)

If you're ok with this then imagine your local lemmy instance getting fined by China/Qatar/Thailand/etc for posting something breaking their laws.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Fine the phone company for allowing calls they don't like.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 162 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Imagine running a website for 20 years, changing absolutely nothing, and one day you're being targeted because someone else on the other side of the planet changed something at their end.

Tell them to piss off.

They'll come after your phpbb instance next.

[–] CallateCoyote@lemmy.world 56 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

“Block us then. We’re not paying your fines and you’ll never arrest us as we’ll never step foot in your country. Get fucked.” That’s about the response I’d have I think… attached with a photo of tubgirl or something for the classic lawls.

[–] anarchyrabbit@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Ok I wish I did not search for tubgirl now

[–] Ultraword@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 day ago

The global push for censorship is accelerating and not nearly enough people are woke to it.

[–] Gemini24601@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Is it even possible for Ofcom to legally fine 4chan for these issues? How does a company in the UK fine a US company?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 187 points 2 days ago (52 children)

The UK should just block sites that don't comply. They have no business trying to fine US websites.

[–] richardwallass@sh.itjust.works 55 points 2 days ago

People should fight for their rights and free speech and make pressure on the gouvernement. Blocking is isolationism.

load more comments (51 replies)
[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So then.... Potential arrest and imprisonment for 4chan for no proven damage. Meanwhile, Trump can visit the King.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

4chan is likely using this to take it to the courts.

[–] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

hope they write their legal battle in green txt

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

be me

American't social mediatard

Britbongs demand money

Notmyproblem.png

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 90 points 2 days ago (2 children)

4chan also faces potential arrest and/or “imprisonment for a term of up to two years,” the lawsuit said.

You don't want to be locked in a small cell with 4chan for two years.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 76 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They'll never control the hacker known as 4chan

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›