this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
32 points (92.1% liked)

Asklemmy

50898 readers
955 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Does method of execution, crime committed or overall cost matter to you?

(page 2) 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] nullpotential@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You cannot be punished if you are dead. The death penalty is just convenient catharsis and a release of burden for the living.

Not the death penalty, but the lost prophets guy who got stabbed to death recently got off easy. Death was too good for him.

Not the death penalty, but the lost prophets guy who got stabbed to death recently got off easy. Death was too good for him.

Yeah I'm 1000% against the death penalty but I also reserve the right to feel that people like him deserve death or worse. I reserve the right to feel schadenfreude and to celebrate when monsters are destroyed, even if I think that rehabilitation would be a better outcome if possible in finite time.

I recognize that sentiment. I've heard arguments that a person can/will eventually find a level of happiness/contentment while incarcerated. They will eventually enjoy a book or have a friend. Same can't be said for their deceased victims.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Yup. It should not be a thing.

[โ€“] Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The death penalty is not an effective punishment, it is a security measure and should only be used if confinement is unsuccessful and the risk is sufficient, which should be a high bar.

[โ€“] BarrelsBallot@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think the death penalty is silly even from an evil standpoint, death is a kind release compared to life in an American prison.

Are you saying prisons in America are a cruel and/or unusual punishment?

[โ€“] vortexal@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Not really, but I'm not against it. When you remember that in order to even get the death penalty, you have to be such a horrible person that you're pretty much no longer human, I don't see a problem with it. And then there is also the issue of the government has to pay potentially millions of dollars every years just for keeping you in prison/jail, so it also has financial benefits (not that the government needs more money, especially considering the fact that they constantly waste it on meaningless bullshit).

But I am also aware of the potential problems, like innocent people getting the death penalty. As a result, I think the death penalty should only be used in situations where there is absolutely no possibility of innocence. This means that the motive is clear and proven, and the evidence for even committing the crime(s) is/are solid.

load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] pebbles@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If we had some omniscient and perfectly fair justice system that could confirm there is no other option, sure. But jeesh, how much further could we be from that yk? The US justice system is becoming increasingly blatantly political.

Also, as someone who thinks punishment is vindictive and unnecessary compared to rehabilitation, the ultimate punishment does not appeal to me.

I can agree with that.

[โ€“] IWW4@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

I am all for it. I can think of dozens of reasons that people should be put down.

Does the method of execution matter to me? Yes.

Does the crime matter? Absolutely

Does the cost matter? No.

[โ€“] individual@toast.ooo 2 points 1 day ago

the only people who should get the death penalty, are people who support it

[โ€“] DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think it's appropriate in some cases, when a crime is disgusting and extremely selfish.

These are what I would approve it for.

-Murder for non idealogical reasons, or not for revenge, or also if the murder is cruel.

-Volent pedophilia, including kidnapping and rape or coercion.

-Political corruption or grand scams that hurt many people.

-Propaganda or profiting off destroying democratic institutions. Conspiracy against the public like fiat currencies.

-Sensless animal cruelty.

-promoting religion for power reasons while being a hypocrite.

-Extreme child neglect, like doing drugs while pregnant.

-Dissolving as a politician or advocating for the dissolution of basic human rights like privacy.

-High treason, as is a head of state or a chair of the house working with foreigners to subvert your political autonomy.

-Putting people in prison who are known to be innocent.

These are what I consider to be extremely serious crimes. Probably a few more I can add on there. Most of these as you can see mostly target people with power, the rest are just for cruelty and extreme selfishness at the expense of others which causes mass corruption.

load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ