this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
124 points (99.2% liked)

News

23268 readers
4893 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, this week announced that Israel would retain an open-ended security presence in Gaza. Israeli officials talk of imposing a buffer zone to keep Palestinians away from the Israeli border. They rule out any role for the Palestinian Authority, which was ousted from Gaza by Hamas in 2007 but governs semi-autonomous areas of the occupied West Bank.

The United States has laid out a much different vision. Top officials have said they will not allow Israel to reoccupy Gaza or further shrink its already small territory. They have repeatedly called for a return of the internationally recognized Palestinian Authority and the resumption of peace talks aimed at establishing a Palestinian state alongside Israel.

These conflicting visions have set the stage for difficult discussions between Israel and the U.S.

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 36 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Crazed strongman Netanyahu wants to kill all of the Palestinians, while the US wants him to kill less than that.

[–] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

I think this is pretty close to the truth. However, Netanyahu is pragmatic and knows he can't actually kill them all. Rather, his goal is to make conditions in Gaza so unliveable that the Palestinians will have to leave.

What will the US do? It will keep pushing the 2-state solution. Since neither the Israelis nor the Palestinians are ready for that yet, it effectively means that the killing will continue until the Gazan Palestinians leave or are so beaten down that they'll agree to almost anything, or until average Israelis cool down and push the conservative coalition government out of power. Getting to those conditions will still take months.

I don't think that most of the rest of the world gives a shit. Sure, some people will protest Israel's actions, but all the big countries, East and West, have more pressing problems. Putin is already at war with Ukraine. Xi frets about Taiwan and the South China Sea, slowing economic growth, and is busy with another round of internal purges. Europe is far more worried about Ukraine than Gaza. They have to spend billions ramping up their militaries again, and Germany's economic engine is sputtering. The US is too embroiled in its own domestic political problems. The US is also, rightly, much more concerned about the serious geostrategic competition coming from China. Even the surrounding Arab countries don't care all that much. They aren't going to go to war against Israel again, that's for sure.

The hard truth is that Gaza just doesn't matter that much geo-strategically.

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 17 points 11 months ago

Yup. The hard right in Israel opposes a two state solution.

[–] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If Netanyahu wants to fuck around he can damn well find out when America cuts off the funding faucet.

[–] Wermhatswormhat@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

Man. I wish that were the case. But I feel like America is too deep in bed with Israel to stop now. A man can dream though, a man can dream.

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is going to take time. What to do with Gaza and Palestinians is going to take a lot of commitment. The US wants to unite the West bank with Gaza, and the current power level is opposed.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

That would be hard, considering the west bank exist exclusively on paper. In reality, Palestinians only have a couple dozen of hamlets surrounded and guarded by Israelis who subject them to an apartheid. The rest of the west bank is Israeli settlements.

[–] middlemanSI@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Both should fuck off and restore Palestine. There would be no "terrorists", if the people were allowed to live in the first place. Are you blind or dishonest?

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Israel gets its way, US sends as much aid as Israel wants.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

The ideology of Hamas has deep support in Gaza; no matter how thoroughly the organization is destroyed now, it will be rebuilt unless it is kept actively suppressed. I don't see how that's possible without an occupation, and I suspect American leadership would privately agree, given the experience of the USA in Iraq and Afghanistan. (How much of what the USA publicly announces is the same as what it says to Israel in private?)

An occupation would be expensive, bloody, and globally unpopular - it can't last forever and the only way I see of ending it eventually without a return to the pre-war status quo is to find some organization that is capable of both coexisting with Israel and ruling Gaza. If that's not the Palestinian Authority, what is it? The Israelis opposed to a two-state solution haven't offered a realistic alternative.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

experience of the USA in Iraq and Afghanistan.

you mean where we tried to- and failed- to keep Iraq and Afghanistan ~~oppressed~~"suppressed"? Our experience says... it ain't gonna happen.

The hard-right Israelis have already offered their solution. it's called "Nakba" - the translation? Genocide.

[–] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The problem is that you can't just roll in an army, shoot anything that pokes its head out, and call it a day. Without extensive efforts to build infrastructure and create jobs to give people a sense of normalcy and belief that their lives are improving, you'll just build up resentment. That's what the US did for Germany and Japan post-WWII, and any other such endeavors will require at least that same amount of ongoing commitment. Admittedly, German and Japanese rehabilitation was also greatly helped by the fact that the USSR existed as a convenient external enemy to point at, and I don't think there's anything nearly as convenient in the Middle East, given that for most Israel would be said external enemy.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Without extensive efforts to build infrastructure and create jobs to give people a sense of normalcy and belief that their lives are improving, you’ll just build up resentment.

exactly. the Zionists are unwilling to give them that normalcy... or representation or basic rights, even. Hamas needs the Zionists, and the Zionists need Hamas, because their goals are to annihilate the other; any moderates that get traction towards peace of any sort compromise their goals.

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

There was actually a jobs programs allowing Gazans to work in Israel. Some of the Gazans then participated in the October 7th attacks and murdered civilians in the very villages they were working in.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

…and? What’s the point here?

Many in that program were starting their day at 3 am just to get through the checkpoint, because the number let out was largely controlled. There shouldn’t have to be a jobs program, and there wouldn’t be such a program if they weren’t oppressing the palistinians in the first place.

[–] Sparlock@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Dude the slaves in the US had jobs (unpaid of course) and were working when they revolted. They totally should have been grateful and tried some civil disobedience instead. /S

[–] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

We need some proof for that statement.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Iraq actually showed us a way to solve it without suppression. We brought the local militias into the fold.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The ideology of Hamas has deep support in Gaza; no matter how thoroughly the organization is destroyed now, it will be rebuilt unless it is kept actively suppressed.

I think this is a mistake. Hamas's popularity doesn't come from the fact that their ideas are wildly popular, but because Fatah was exposed as horrendously corrupt in the late 90s and early 2000s. Hamas's radical ideology is not a core part of Palestinian identity - it is simply a result of circumstances that were in no small part urged on by Israeli manipulation.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

Their popularity also comes from how peace is just not working. Which is why even if it's destroyed, another armed resistance organization will spring up. Hamas is the only logical answer to a situation where peace 100% won't work, while violence only 90% won't work.

[–] Wermhatswormhat@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And let’s no forget that Israel was the one who started and funded Hamas. Eventually the citizens of Gaza then elected Hamas as their governing body. All that to say, a single state is the best we can hope for. Israel is repulsed by that but after this shit show it’s the only thing that makes any sense.

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Hamas was voted in 20 years ago, and ran as moderates.

They now rule Gaza through violence and fear.

They exist because Israel helped found them, but they still exist because Israel is still propping them up.

[–] Wermhatswormhat@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Yeah, you said it better than I did. Thank you.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

AFAIK Hamas's election platform was that peace clearly wasn't working.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Their election platform was that Fatah was an Israeli puppet and they wanted to move towards a two state solution and stopping the settlers.

The action was to give up moderation because the entire world supported the Israeli blockade and treating Hamas as a terrorist organization.

[–] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works -3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Hamas was voted in 20 years ago

Hamas was elected in 2006 so almost 18 years ago.

and ran as moderates

Please provide verifiable support for this statement.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

About a thousand news reports from 2006. We're not going down this rabbit hole where you demand sources for well known stuff.

[–] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works -5 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Sparlock@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

What a moronic comment.

"I demand sources that are easily goggleable and will declare victory if you don't do the search for me!" -- girlfreddy

[–] Sparlock@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Open a fucking history book. This isn't hard.