this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
67 points (95.9% liked)

Linux

56124 readers
1311 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello everyone - I have been wanting to ditch windows on my gaming pc for a while now, and since I have recently finished a large project, I now have the free time to switch. I am relatively comfortable with Debian having used it for a while on my web server as well as school laptop, but I am concerned about using it on my gaming computer since I have heard stock Debian is not the greatest for gaming. All of my other daily driver programs I know will work, so I am mainly concerned with the gaming aspect.

In the case that you don't recommend Debian for my gaming computer, do you have an OS that you would recommend?

I appreciate any insight!

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bitrate@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm in a similar boat as you and my current plan is to switch to PopOS. They are Ubuntu/Debian based so you will be familiar with it, and they also are a distro that is more focused on gaming, so you will have an easier time with video card drivers.

[–] Bizarroland@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

The only issue that I have with pop OS is that it seems unnecessarily slow at times.

I'm running a Lenovo legion 5 with a 10750x, 32 gigs of ram, and a 2060 in it and sometimes it would feel a full second between when I click the button and when something happens.

Fedora was a little bit better about that, but I don't use that because of the weird politics surrounding Fedora right now.

Now I'm on a mint cinnamon and it's actually pretty good, although I have yet to try playing any games from steam on it.

The other issues I have is that Fedora would keep my Bluetooth speakers connected between reboots but both pop OS and Linux cinnamon require that I manually reconnect every time.

[–] LifeCoffeeGaming@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I was in a similar boat to you, but then I installed pop and just gave it a go. Stuck it on a separate hd for now but with everything setup and working I'm very happy with it.

[–] xarexyouxmadx@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

IMO it's not that Debian isn't good for gaming. It's that it's not good for gaming IF you want to just install Debian and start gaming right away. There's going to be a bit of downloading/installing, & configuring first.

If Debian is too far back of a starting point for you then I'd either go with a gaming distro where many things will already come installed and possibly (idk for sure because I've not used any gaming distros) configured for you to where you mostly just need to sign in and download your games.

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I switched from arch to Debian bookworm for my work/gaming pc, and I have no regrets. Same amount of time setting up as arch, because of the newer kernel on bookworm you don’t have many prerequisites to install. Was gaming within an hour or two. That was six months ago, and things don’t break all the time like arch, where they would fix graphics drivers, but doing so would bork the sound. I play everything from factorio to cyberpunk, no issues. Only thing I can not get running for the life of me on windows or Linux is forza motorsports.

I don’t think distro matters as much anymore with modern Linux. There are enough tutorials out there on most of them, should be easy to get setup on almost anything.

[–] arthur@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

From Arch to Debian, that's a 180° on stability. But to be honest, I'm using arch for 2 months now and everything seems very stable. I had no problems, yet.

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I never had an issue with system stability with Arch. It was just tiring every day making sure everything was up to date. Updates would break little things, like audio or some wine dependencies and I would just have to deal till I ran updates the next day. Meanwhile with Debian, the only issue I have ran into was with lutris and battle.net, and that turned out to just be a problem with mangohud.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 years ago

“not the greatest at gaming” is still perfectly fine – the main argument against Debian stable (at least for gamers) is that, since Debian’s focus is on stability, they’re not riding the bleeding edge of updates and features

[–] rem26_art@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Idk how well Debian stable would work, but Debian Sid might be a bit easier to work with in terms of games with it being more on the bleeding edge.

There's also Linux Mint Debian if you want to stay in the Debian universe, but you'd get more of the ease of use of Mint.

Me personally, I'm using Fedora for gaming and I haven't really had many issues with it. If you're feeling adventurous, you could try Fedora or Nobara, which is a more gaming focused spinoff of Fedora

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Debian is very manual in like everything. But Linux Mint uses Cinnamon which uses X11 for a loong time and that is pretty bad for anything modern with Graphics Cards

[–] rem26_art@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

True, but there's always the option of installing KDE or something else with Wayland support

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What does Linux mint have what debian doesnt? I can only think of the deb firefox and the timeshift backups which are both really neat

[–] dragnet@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just convenience in the form of focusing on a user-friendly out of the box experience, really. That's enough for me to use it over Debian on desktop, though I like Debian for servers.

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

But Debian for servers is also a pain.

  • no hardened ssh config
  • apparmor by default?
  • no automatic updates which is bogus
[–] The_Zen_Cow_Says_Mu@infosec.pub 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Currently running debian with an amd GPU. Using the regular 6.1 kernel

With steam flatpak and bottles (for nonsteam windows games) everything is running just fine.

[–] AlijahTheMediocre@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Fedora Silverblue and Linux Mint Debian Edition are my goto distros atm. Have not had issues with either, they've been great out of the box. Fedora Silverblue requires relearning a few things however, being very container oriented.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Fedora Silverblue

Just FYI: https://universal-blue.org/images/bazzite/ It's based on Silverblue but with gaming as primary focus.

[–] Unyieldingly@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I been running Debian with a few Backports like Pipewire, Kernel, and Flatpak it has been good so far.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

AMD or Nvidia?

[–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I was daily driving arch for 5 years and decided to switch two months ago just like you now and running Debian 12 happily, tried fedora, set subvolumes to timeshift btrfs to work because it was not installed out of the box, and after update from 38 to 39 with official gui update tool, it broke and locked away ssd so i had to recover data, after that i installed Debian 12 and had no problems at all, machine ALWAYS ready to work and stable as fuck, heavenly experience so far actually

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

also dual boot first before going cold turkey

[–] Marduk73@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

i went cold turkey when i got that early, free upgrade from win7 to win 10. after a week of win 10 and unable to downgrade back to 7. Bam. i became full time linux at that moment.

[–] PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

I've had stability issues with mint. It's usually a problem with updates bricking my install.

[–] Presi300@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Debian is fine, but not that great if you wanna game, it's packages are kinda old and that matters a lot of you wanna game on linux, as the scene is rapidly evolving, even as we speak. It will work, you just might have issues with certain packages being to old and games not running as well as they should... If you want a gaming 1st distro, try nobara or something with newer packages, like EndeavorOS.

Another thing that matters a lot when it comes to gaming on linux is the desktop environment and display server. It's a big topic and I'm gonna get hated on, no matter what I recommend here, but my personal recommendation is to use the KDE Plasma desktop with the Wayland session. Again, it's a big topic and you should look up the pros and cons of using Wayland or X11 for gaming, I recommend using Wayland to avoid certain headaches with X11 and to have a generally more usable system while gaming...

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Debian Sid should be fine. I wouldn't go with Stable − too old.

Personally, I'd go with the Flathub version of Steam and not pollute my main system with 32bit libraries Steam required for backwards compatibility. With the 32bit dependencies as Flatpak Runtimes, the main system stays clean.

Kinda unfair to call Debian stable old when it just got a new release a few months ago. Sure, in a year or two it'll start to feel old, but if one were to use flatpaks as you suggested, then Debian stable is perfectly fine, as at that point you aren't even using the system libs anyway.

[–] c10l@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I’m using Debian testing + a few packages from experimental (Mesa) and xanmod or liquorix kernel.

It’s been a great experience. Stable as expected, performant as anything else.

[–] IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

I've used Debian before on my gaming laptop (nvidia card), but drivers were enough of a pain that I just switched to Mint. As much as Canonical annoys me, drivers have been much more plug-and-play for me on Ubuntu downstreams than on raw Debian.

[–] Veraxus@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Debian is my go-to. So long as you’re already comfortable with Linux, you can get gaming working with a tiny bit of elbow grease… and unlike some other distros, Debian is rock-solid.

[–] rotopenguin@infosec.pub 1 points 2 years ago

Nobara, which is by GloriousEggroll of ProtonGE fame, is the first thing to think of when looking for a gaming distro.

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

You need an up to date systems to utilize newest packages of drivers (etc.) to make full use of recent hardware and to be able to play new games.

[–] doctorn@r.nf 1 points 2 years ago

Last time I tried this myself I could play a lot, but never the ones I wanted and ended up switching back anyway. Ever since I've just always been running a linux and a windows PC, each to its best use.

I must stress however this experience of mine was over a decade ago and I have heard there's been a lot of improvement on the subject, with steamdeck becoming a thing and alike, so I have no up-to-date experience in what runs and what doesn't anymore. What I cán tell you however is that whichever Windows-only game did play (using Wine back then, dunno how it's done these days) always played at least 2-5x better than on the actual Windows it was made for. 😅

So good luck and I would love some information as to your eventual result!

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 1 points 2 years ago

Linux Mint Debian Edition (LMDE 6) might also be a good fit for you.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Late to the thread but I would say yeah, Debian is good for gaming. The only place I have issued is with VR, otherwise it's been smooth sailing for the past 3 years.

[–] earmuff@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 years ago

At the end of the day, the distribution is not that important for gaming, unless you need those 1-2 extra fps. Debian is a very good choice for workstations nowadays. I was a long time OpenSUSE user, always had joys with Debian, but yesterday switched to Garuda Linux (Arch variant optimized for gaming) and I love it so far very much.

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If Debian Stable supports your hardware, go for it. If not, try Debian Sid, but it won't be as stable. You can install up-to-date applications, like Steam, using flatpaks in any case.

Even if you opt for stable and there's an update that you may take advantage from, you can always update your kernel in several ways or change to Debian Sid (unstable), but you can't go back unless you change to Debian Testing and then wait the freeze of Testing which then becomes Debian Stable.

[–] 0x4E4F@infosec.pub 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Don't opt for an LTS distro for gaming (or even for regular desktop use), opt of a rolling release one... or at least one that has 2 or 3 regular yearly releases.

[–] Astaroth@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

All I know is wine-mono and wine-gecko doesn't come in any default package lists on apt that you get on Linux Mint (which should include Debian and Ubuntu packages), not sure if they exist on some other mirror list somewhere but it didn't seem like it, while on Arch I got them directly from Extra (not even AUR).

Well you technically don't need mono or gecko, especially not if you're just going to use Steam Proton to play, but I use pure WINE a lot and it was a pain having to install them manually. Eventually I gave up on using mono and just downloaded the .net runtimes I needed through winetricks.

 

There were also some lib32 package I got from AUR on Arch that didn't exist on apt. One of those gst plugins (ugly/good/bad/nice/whatever)