this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
54 points (98.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35703 readers
3559 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

From my understanding: I get that for honeybees, they need the nectar to make honey (their energy food source) and the pollen is an additional, essential food source for them which contains protein. They collect both nectar and pollen from flowers. For other pollinators like wasps, they don't make honey but they still need to eat nectar and pollen which they collect from flowers. Though these pollinators benefit (survive/thrive) by collecting nectar and pollen from flowers, they also help plants to reproduce by carrying pollen between them and depositing it.

But why do they transfer pollen to other flowering plants? Of course this allows certain plants to reproduce, but that doesn't explain why these pollinators care about helping plants reproduce. Are they little plant farmers who actually realise that transferring pollen and therefore making more plants, would benefit them? That would seem to demonstrate pretty high-level intelligence and foresight, planning wouldn't it? Or is it just incidental that they're going between flowers collecting nectar and pollen and happen to drop some pollen from previous flowers along the way?

I really struggled to find any information on the "WHY" of what bees are doing, from their own psychology point of view.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ironeaglebird@sopuli.xyz 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Bees make excellent pollinators because most of their life is spent collecting pollen, a source of protein that they feed to their developing offspring. When a bee lands on a flower, the hairs all over the bees' body attract pollen grains through electrostatic forces.

Basically plants have coevolved with these pollinating insects. Plants that can develop the best pollen that sticks to these insects are able to reproduce more successfully. While bees, as the example, are collecting it as there food. Bees are not "helping" the plant knowingly, its more of the plant is hitching a ride.

https://www.canr.msu.edu/nativeplants/pollination/

[–] SeahorseTreble@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

So, the plants found a way to hijack the bees' journey by putting some extra pollen on them to take to other flowers, since they're already there taking pollen anyway? That's awesome.

[–] ironeaglebird@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

The flowers are also evolving to spread pollen to reproduce. Flowers have evolved to be bright, colorful and have pollen that bees want. Flowers are able to get there pollen spread and bees get food.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

https://youtube.com/shorts/IhYtwBA3NNs

Secondary comment, still not an expert...

But even if there were no bugs on the planet, I'm pretty sure a good stiff breeze would still make pollen move...

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

When a bee lands on a flower, the hairs all over the bees’ body attract pollen grains through electrostatic forces.

Were those hairs evolutionarily selected for because they help the bees spread their food source, or do they serve another purpose?

[–] Offlein@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ha I was writing another comment on this thread when this got posted, but I just feel like it's important, relevant to that, to say that the hairs didn't evolve FOR any specific purpose.

[–] ironeaglebird@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

Well said. Evolution doesn't have a goal. I ran into the difficulty when teaching is that students tended to assign purpose to mutations that are currently beneficial.

[–] ironeaglebird@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Possibly when furrier bees evolved, it could be that the fur was protecting them from harsh weather conditions and allowing them to fly further and making it to more flowers. The fur builds electrostatic forces as the bee went along with its day. Serving another beneficail purpose by attracting more pollen to stick onto their bodies. The bees also use the fur to wipe pollen from their eyes and off their legs.

Essentially furrier bees were more successful at feeding their offspring than non-fur bees. Which was selecting for even furrier bees in the following generations continuing to the furry honeybees we see today.

[–] ebits21@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I would point out that the furry bees transfer more pollen, which leads to more of the plants and ultimately flowers that the bee likes.

Therefore the furry bees have an advantage by increasing their own food supply.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bees are messy. When they go to the flower, it gets all over them.

The flowers are designed such that the pollen does this…. Because the flowers that do spread better. The bees are just there to get food, but while they’re going about getting food, they’re making an awful mess, and the flowers benefit.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

that's a lovely photo! did you take it? I couldn't find anything on a reverse image search...

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Thank you! I did! It's here in the Awwnverts community: https://lemmy.world/post/2928386 And here she is from another angle in the Beebutts community: https://lemmy.world/post/2929223

I've been carefully deadheading that bull thistle that grew in my yard this year because I don't want only bull thistle in my yard next year, but the bumble bees just freak out over it, so I don't have the heart to get rid of it while it's in bloom. It's about six feet high and very thorny.

[–] Offlein@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

This is funny, and really speaks to a fundamental issue we have during education as to assigning agency for what amount to"random" events.

OP is presumably educated and intelligent, and the takeaway they had was that bees "are pollinators" which is true with regard to our interest in them, but definitely implies agency that they are intentionally pollinating, which (I am pretty sure) isn't true.

It feels like the same question that gets asked in a million different ways of "why did XYZ evolve that way when ABCD?" (Because evolution is random and tends toward selecting for energy conservation. Not to "achieve" some specific goal.)

[–] Nettle@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They aren't farming, they’re foraging, and have evolved symbiotic relationships through evolution. The plants get a benefit by getting pollinated, the bees get a benefit by having more flowers to feed on.

Since they need pollen, bees who developed those little hairs are/were able to out-compete bees who didn’t have them. They're able to carry a lot more pollen and incidentally transfer it, spreading it around, so the new bees are better pollinators. That helps plants produce a lot more flowers, so it’s truly a symbiotic relationship- one would not exist without the other. Since wasps are omnivores, the evolutionary pressure to specialize isn't as strong.

IIrc, there are some wasps who have specialized relationships with certain plants and flowers too, driven by evolution- the flowers depend on the wasps, and the wasps depend on the flowers.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Re: wasps, some orchids grow petals that look like a wasp's ass to trigger attempts at mating.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Disclaimer: I am not an expert.

With that said, I believe it's mostly an accidental transfer as the pollen is basically a dust that easily carries on flying bugs legs.

If I'm wrong and experts know a more scientific answer, feel free to downvote me into oblivion.

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Am not an expert either and I agree with you : like he guessed it is incidental.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

i remember learning about how (some?) flowers are shaped to sprinkle pollen on the back of the insect. They may not need to "consciously" carry pollen, it spreads, it's on their body.

nectar is supplied in small doses to keep the insect (or the bird) working

insects or birds are just trying to get more nectar (?)

[–] jago@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

nectar is supplied in small doses to keep the insect (or the bird) working
insects or birds are just trying to get more nectar (?)

You're saying is that flowers are nature's pimp. That's cool, I guess.

As long as flowers don't start smacking a bee for not collecting. Feel me?

[–] Rayspekt@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

First I've read "planets" rather than "plants" and got really curios what I've missed in the meantime.

[–] u202307011927@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

!outoftheloop@somewhere.lemmy

[–] PM_me_your_vagina_thanks@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bro out here thinking bees are fucking farmers, fucking hell.

[–] CordanWraith@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

I mean... Ants farm Aphids. Why couldn't bees farm flowers?