this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
101 points (88.5% liked)

Technology

72360 readers
3178 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] simple@lemm.ee 93 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The presentation used the example, "Imagine ChatGPT, but it already knows everything about your life."

I'm impressed someone thought of that, wrote a presentation, rehearsed it, then presented it and at no point thought that it sounds creepy and invasive.

[–] AtmaJnana@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It sounds like exactly what I would want, if it were open source, audited, and under my direct control.

https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues//Charlie.html

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago

It sound like exactly what i have been saying is the future of human growth.

Ai companions that are like a butler, best friend, therapist, mailperson, accountant, lawyer all in one.

Your ai talks to their ai, before you ever met they each return a baseline of info, conversational opener and suggestions for meeting at a date/location

And absolutely yes on the open source under my direct control cause holy shit end of the world if it is not.

[–] inspxtr@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

suggests either these people are so detached from reality, or they are appealing this to very specific sets of people under the guise of a general appeal

[–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

not even family member know everything about life

is private

[–] Squeak@lemmy.world 71 points 2 years ago
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 56 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh dont worry, we already have the data. This is just a formal announcement. Your new bot will arrive in 5 days.

[–] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 15 points 2 years ago

The bot has already existed in a different form for years. Instead of you talking to it they asked it which ads are most effective to show you specifically.

Google is not just getting into ML. They've been at the bleeding edge for decades.

[–] DampSquid@feddit.uk 33 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Google has announced the closure of Project Ellmann, ending minutes of speculations

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

You're just being cute, right?

[–] reflex@kbin.social 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Project Ad-mann.

[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Jokes on us tho. Google is going ahead with this, it's just never going to made available for public use. It's only to use for figuring out exactly what we'll buy.

[–] Fisk400@feddit.nu 12 points 2 years ago

Google can't even keep a podcast service going. I certainly wouldn't trust them with a little buddy that I care about.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 years ago
[–] Reality_Suit@lemmy.one 11 points 2 years ago

Mmmmm, how intimate? Will it know...everything? blushes

[–] Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 years ago
[–] RanchOnPancakes@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

paaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaass

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago

I propose that we do not.

[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago

A chatbot that needs to mind its own damn business, I say.

[–] TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 years ago

Yeah, I'd rather not, piss off.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’ve literally dreamed of having such a boy since the late 90s. But decades of following the tech industry since have shown me how I might not want that after all…

[–] shea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago

You probably meant bot (and not boy) but it sure made a funny mental image. I'm imagining a little robo Pinocchio type boy

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

And it's named freaking "ElIman"? L

[–] GravityAce@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

Google can't even serve me ads in the right language right now so... doubt this chatbot thing is going to work

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Bring it on, I'll make it hate me

[–] Paragone@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

The right to NONassociation should always outrank the right to association.

Molesters may claim the right to closely-associate, but the right-to-be-not-molested should outrank their association-right.

Nonassociation needs to be a fundamental right.

In multiple contexts.

Abusees who want no-contact to have teeth,

molester-survivors,

etc.

Including identity-molestation/theft, and other abuses of one's personal information.

_ /\ _

[–] Destraight@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

I'm not going to use it. Just like I don't use other stupid AI that Snapchat added

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

….. and they’ll sell or otherwise profit off of every goddamn byte of that data

[–] sour@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

cute laptop still better

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

If Google actually made me a hentai waifu bot that would be based.

[–] Kemwer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Does it sound like Scarlett Johansson? If not, no.