Homeless people should NOT exist in a world with trillionaires. Fuck the rich so hard.
this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2025
938 points (99.0% liked)
Memes
53271 readers
1206 users here now
Rules:
- Be civil and nice.
- Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Here’s a reminder that there are nearly 14,000,000 vacant houses in America, and less than 650,000 homeless people. The math comes out to ~22 vacant houses for every single homeless person. I’ll give you one guess which income bracket owns the vast majority of those vacant houses…
I’ll give you one guess which income bracket owns the vast majority of those vacant houses…
it's poor people, right? right?
Well duh, they're on the street because they're experiencing decision paralysis on what house to live in that day.
Phrase that differently or the wealthy will get the wrong idea.
nah, I'm not a minor
That wasn't what I...
You know what, that works too.
I think this might have been about the "should not exist" party which could also mean "kill them all", in the billionaire's mind.
Alright, so let's kill 'em!
(Ambiguity is on purpose.)
They know goddamn well a big contingent is willing to if they had the opportunity, so they've gone to great lengths to avoid such possibilities.
This should intrigue people who like a challenge idk
Totally agree. What the fuck is a society that just cares about money and not people. Its not worth surviving.
The sad thing is that it has been like this for so damn long it isn't funny. And the people who like it this way will never go away.
It's "expensive" in the "right" way. The costs are paid by taxes, which are largely supplied by the 99%. The revenue, by contrast, is privatized, going to corporations owned by the 1%.
So it's only "expensive" for the masses, which lawmakers don't care about.
Not to mention the slave labor they gain out of it.
I was lumping that into "revenue"
👆 👆 These two guys/girls/dudes/men/women get it.
Just another way to extract surplus created by the 99%.
Well, there WAS that thing a couple of months ago where Kilmeade said the quiet part out loud, suggesting we should execute them.
It's an investment by the megacorps (with gov monies) into keeping the plebs in check, to not get any ideas around equity, social reform, tax increases, megacorp regulation (consumer prices/margins cap), higher wages, etc.
It's super effective.
The same infrastructure can also be recycled in event of a full-on fascist gov.
Not only that. The housing is then maintained by taxpayers, who are not the rich strata. So it's another way to funnel money from the poor/middle class to the corporation owned by the rich.
no, we should arm the homeless
How else do we keep cops from fucking with them?
This is how people start believing the free market makes it moral for poor people to just die instead
If these people were at all reasonable or giving a shit about anybody else, they wouldn't be ayncaps.
We? How about "we" remove the rich, so that homelessness is only a frie and true choice if you want to be traveling?
The only people who'd like there to be homeless people are the rich and powerful.
Next stop: extermination.
There is an average of 45.9 empty homes in the U.S. for each person experiencing homelessness.
It isn't even really about the privatization. They just want the ability to game the investment scam system.
view more: next ›