this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2025
415 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

77846 readers
4650 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 136 points 1 month ago (6 children)

They are disabling it because the license cost went up 4 cents? Just pass that cost onto the customer. Even if they mark that up several times, I would rather pay that than have my battery drained because I have to software decode a video.

There is still a lot of H.265 content out there. I have many terabytes of it that I don't want to transcode.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 87 points 1 month ago (3 children)

synology also did this recently. shit should be illegal.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (3 children)

that was the final straw for me to switch NAS vendors when I next upgrade.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] riskable@programming.dev 26 points 1 month ago

What should be illegal is patents like this!

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 month ago

From the article:

Last year, NAS company Synology announced that it was ending support for HEVC, as well as H.264/AVC and VCI, transcoding on its DiskStation Manager and BeeStation OS platforms, saying that “support for video codecs is widespread on end devices, such as smartphones, tablets, computers, and smart TVs.”

Well, not anymore lol.

[–] OmegaSunkey@ani.social 86 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

He's usually right.

*On software. For the love of god don't follow his ideas on consent, child sex, or bestiality.

[–] planish@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Or plants. Or whether you should shout at people. Or sort of the concept of women.

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] syaochan@feddit.it 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

For the love of god don’t follow his ideas on consent, child sex, or bestiality.

Or eating habits

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 83 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Let me get this straight - people buy a product advertised as having a feature, containing a part also advertised as having that feature, and then they disable it after purchase?

How is that legal?

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 91 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Americans have no consumer protections.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

No, they disable it before purchase, existing laptops still have the feature. Only the newer ones so they won't have to pay the royalties from next year. But still an anti consumer move as nobody will notice until it's too late for a refund. Normal people will never understand why their $200 phone can smoothly play h265 videos while their $1500 laptop is struggling with that. Everyone will assume that because hardware support is included in the cheapest processors from even a decade ago, it will still be present in the latest and greatest laptops from hp

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 77 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes this is absolutely ridiculous.

This is also a good reason to avoid proprietary codecs. H.265 may be a great codec, but the licensing fees are basically a tax on the world.

The best solution would be an overall switch to AV1. But silicon support for that is not nearly as widespread.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Yeah that’s going to change fucking fast. My game streaming service I build from older parts to cut costs has 1 shiney modern part because of AV1. Just AV1. Nothing else influenced the purchase of that part.

And there is no way a big company made that part just for me.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] dditty@lemmy.dbzer0.com 71 points 1 month ago

Imagine buying a "Pro" laptop that can't even play HEVC videos without software transcoding. This is insane penny pinching and infuriating

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 68 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't for a second believe this is about the rising cost. It raised by $0.04. Someone below said that works out to a savings of $600,000.

Alright, but for an individual, it's $0.04.

Just increase the final price by $0.25. You made back your $600,000. Plus whatever $0.21 would equate to as GAINS.

Fuck guys. You suck at business. This is what happens when companies replace their CEO with AI.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The real key is buried in the middle, where they say hardware decode capabilities are going to be restricted to models with discrete GPUs... Meaning they can make a $500 upsell mandatory for the most basic of capabilities.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Both HP and Dell are partnered with Microsoft, and have been for decades. Isn't a discrete GPU one of the things required for Microsoft Recall ready machines?

There's NO way they broke HEVC just for 4¢. Something else is paying them a lot more, and Recall would be one of those things.

[–] planish@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The HP 16" EliteBook 665 G11 Notebook costs $1500. That means this $600k "cost cutting" measure starts to decrease revenue if only 400 people buy a laptop from a different brand.

Or even a single person. Someone tasked to purchase 400 laptops for a company, reads this news and decides to get ThinkPads instead...

Sell the CEO private jet if they really need the money

[–] hayvan@feddit.nl 61 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So the hardware is capable, but refuses to work until someone pays for the licensing cost. Yay capitalism bringing innovation!

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It’s interesting how the tone of innovation changes. It starts out like “hey, I can do that better than my competitors!” and that’s all fine, doing something better creating market demand and cash influx. But eventually, the innovation looks for shortcuts… enshitification is the word. Cheaper parts, smaller quantities, subscriptions to hardware you buy but never own… There’s a shift from product/service innovation as means to financial growth to purely financially incentivized innovation.

It reminds me of Marx’s idea that concentration of capital naturally leads to the prominence of financial markets, an indicator of a capitalist economy reaching its “advanced” / crisis-prone phase. The similarity being: there’s an economic shift from industrial investment as means to financial growth to purely financial investment.

[–] markz@suppo.fi 56 points 1 month ago (1 children)

increasing from $0.20 each to $0.24 each in the United States. To put that into perspective, in Q3 2025, HP sold 15,002,000 laptops and desktops

“This is pretty ridiculous, given these systems are $800+ a machine

I wonder how long the list of these fees for one machine is

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 57 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

That's about a $600,000 savings for that quarter, for a company that reported $13.9 billion in revenue for Q3 2025.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It would be cruel of us to ask them to only have $13,899,400,000 in revenue that quarter instead of $13,900,000,000

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago

Someone was a doing a lot of hard work subtracting big scary numbers in their budget sheet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tangeli@piefed.social 51 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is it disabled in hardware, firmware or software? Does Linux enable it?

[–] FancyPantsFIRE@lemmy.world 58 points 1 month ago

Reading through a bit it sounds like it works on Linux, not on Windows. Folks are hypothesizing it’s disabled at the ACPI level because different drivers don’t help.

[–] sepi@piefed.social 45 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Here's two brands I've not touched in decades. Keeping it that way.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

does dell/hp have to pay annual license fees in perpetuity for systems they sell????

[–] gerowen@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (7 children)

H.265 (HEVC) is not a free (as in freedom) codec, so yes. You as an individual consumer can use things like Handbrake to encode H.265 video for your personal use, probably using the free x265 software encoder, but in order for a device like your phone, camera, TV, laptop, etc. to have hardware accelerated encoding or decoding, the manufacturer has to pay a licensing fee.

This is true of lots of proprietary technologies. HDMI is another one. In order for a device to ship with an HDMI port (as opposed to Displayport), the manufacturer has to pay a per-device licensing fee.

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To be fair, I think it is okay to ask for a one-time fee for something you've developed. You want to use this $tech that I made? Sure, pay me 10 ct for every device you put it in.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] commander@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Dumb of HP and Dell to not eat the cost. Just in the future never support VVC. HEVC is well enough a thing already. Push defaults to be AV1 and then in like 5-7 years, AV2. I use AV1 for everything I can. Computer supports it. My phone does not but edits I do on my PC will be encoded to AV1. Photos, support JPEG-XL but in the interim, AVIF. Screw apple for going with HEIC. I highly doubt that there will be a successor to UHD Blu-Rays to adopt VVC. No big reason to jump to 8k. Only good would be higher bitrates/better compression and audio.

Films are mostly recorded digitally with 4k-6k cameras or a limited amount of 35mm still going on that scans well to around 4k. 8K digital cinema cameras are becoming more common but the 4k-6k ones are dominant and 70mm is expensive and uncommon. Plus significant digital effects are prevalent on even low action movies, non-sci-fi. Those are still going to have been mostly done and mastered for 4k. Another round of remastering required for 8k content where digital or 70mm film masters exists. Dinosaur broadcasters may choose VVC the shrinking world population watching dinosaur broadcasters. AV1 is increasingly the present and AV2 will be the future. VVC will be end of line because of short sighted greed

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's clearly a move to make torrent for movies unviable and get funding from Netflix.

[–] Johnmannesca@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Not until you pull the handbrake at least

[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (12 children)

i use x265 for EVERYTHING. i had no clue about this.

fuck.

webm? lol

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

webm is a container, not a codec

Even if you hit that blocker, you can still software-decode with [alternative] software.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] ftbd@feddit.org 17 points 1 month ago

How is this done? Can you just re-enable the feature in the BIOS? And what about machines sold outside the US?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is that a hardware or software issue? I.e. is it caused by the windows driver for these laptops' graphic units?

Does HEVC work with the Linux drivers on these machines?

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

No, it’s a licensing issue. H.265 hardware support requires an ongoing license. And HP+Dell don’t want to continue paying licensing fees for PCs they have already sold. So they’re telling customers “get fucked, use a media player with software decoding instead of using hardware acceleration directly in your browser.”

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gerowen@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Kinda makes me even more glad I've been migrating all my stuff over to AV1/OPUS.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›