Politics

Of course. You start to be surrounded by hangers on, desperate to get in your good graces because we have a weird cult of celebrity and wealth.

Your entire world changes when people start to keep your surroundings favorable to your tastes and people only ever tell you “yes.” You start to believe that you are right all the time and your tastes are impeccable and your opinions fascinating. And then people like tucker Carlson will utilize that for his own ends, extending and utilizing that yes-man follower role to pervert your appearance or your fan base, to achieve something he’s always tried to achieve—but for his own desires (those desires that are, again, shaped by growing up überwealthy, being told you’re special and better since you’ve been old enough to fuckin speak.

Everyone is using everyone else. Some people just have way worse—and way larger—intentions.

I think in qi they once bright it like this:

'What thing you can buy at a newsagents can change the way you vote?'

The answer is a lottery ticket. Most people who win the lottery change their voting habits to reflect their new status.

A bit like people in bmw/Mercedes not using them blinkers. Once prime feel like they've made it they change habits pretty fast. It's pretty shallow, to say the least, but unfortunately not uncommon.

This is why I stay poor and unrecognized. I don't want to get a big head.

Agreed on the basic appeal of core values, BUT there is another vector that the article sidesteps: unabashed tokenism. The extreme right knows it has a pretty nasty optics problem. Most of them try to avoid directly referencing white supremacists (even when their staff members give the game away). They all know that they walk in the shadow of a KKK costume. So, what's a nice white politician to do? Get some Black people on stage who will blow right past the obvious racist motivations that has landed them in the limelight. Give them some cheap attention and some easy money. It's a win-win for everyone on stage, that is until the token has worn out their usefulness.

This is pretty much how I see it. Cash can't solve everything, but it sure smoothes out a heck of a lot of bumps along the way. A lot of people will look the other way if they feel they can get something out of you.

Anyone hard right I know is either a bigot, well to do, or both. When you can have a single income family or you're a jerk, many of these issues don't even make it on your radar. They just seem to not exist or be someone else's problem.

I'd also bet the different factors have different influence. My rough, mostly arbitrary order would be:

wealth > whether you're trans > religion > race/ethnicity & sexuality > gender

I'd never thought of it this way. It certainly makes sense to me though, and gives me a new insight.

This is why intersectionality is key and platitudes like "no war but the class war" miss the point entirely (and ignore all the people who are marginalised for reasons other than wealth and class).
Sure, the class war is essential, but without going to war against all other oppression too, you just end up with fucked up and oxymoronic shit like "national" socialism...

I don't understand why anyone is surprised when minorities are racist. Racism is not unique to white people.

Yeah, there are a lot of people in groups that one might think "Hey, you know the Republicans don't like you and want to make your life miserable, right?" but are socially conservative and are not willing to let that stuff go. There are lots of predominantly Black or Hispanic churches from the "Fun is a sin," denominations like the evangelicals, Pentecostals and Jehovah Witnesses whose members will not make any compromise on issues like abortion or gay rights. Even amongst the more secular people living in these communities can still be influenced by the folks that live around them. You also get a lot of people, especially older people, who are still on board with the law and order, tough on crime shtick, believing this is the sure way to get nice, safe communities to live in.

Religious, older and concerned with security doesn't sound all that different to the stereotypical white conservatives that serve as the base for the Republicans in rural areas. They just need a bit more of a nudge to get there because they have to overcome some resistance to voting for a party that explicitly targets things that are important to them in other areas.

Huh that makes sense.

The people they're aligning themselves with aren't just social conservatives, though. They're fascists.

If, somehow, Republicans ever stopped being so freakin racist, they would have an unbeatable supermajority in the US. The racism of Republicans is the only thing uniting the various faction of the Democratic party. And it's kind of funny that it's very rarely talked about.

Bot glitched?