this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2025
273 points (89.8% liked)

PC Gaming

12870 readers
550 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Son_of_Macha@lemmy.cafe 105 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Why the fuck is Steam still in Russia?

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 32 points 1 week ago

Gabe needs НКВД money.

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 week ago

CSGO trolls from Russia probably make up like 20% of their total revenue.

[–] jazzkoalapaws@ttrpg.network 11 points 1 week ago

💲💲💲

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

For the rubles, of course.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaselle@lemmy.ca 74 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (11 children)

'This isn't "wokeness", it's basic human rights and equality and nothing more,' he added. 'If Steam can't support free speech of LGBTQ+ people, then at the very least they should be transparent about this.'

What a bizarre response. Neither Roskomnadzor nor Valve claimed this had anything to do with "'wokeness,'" and Steam was in fact transparent about this.

I don't really get what anyone expects Valve to do here other than comply with the law. Still, I'm surprised they're even able to operate in Russia given all the sanctions.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 91 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Pulling out of Russia entirely is an option. It's not like they're relying on them to stay in business.

[–] jaselle@lemmy.ca 64 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well, given the sanctions, this ought to be a given. I don't understand how valve can operate in Russia at all tbh.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right? That was my question, why are they operating there at all right now

[–] Honse@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

Valve had a big piracy problem in russia and it was ofc because of service issues. While I obviously don't agree with this censorship and would prefer valve to entirely pull out of russia, I can see why they are absolutely not doing that. They want to provide the best PC gaming store service across the world, and they don't want competitors or piracy to eat into their sales

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The sanctions did impact Steam's operations in Russia. Russian users currently can't use any payment methods to buy games aside from Steam Wallet funds.

[–] jaselle@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago

Then yeah, I'm surprised valve is cooperating. I suppose they are planning for the future, should the sanctions end.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ahornsirup@feddit.org 11 points 1 week ago

They could just not comply? What's Russia gonna do, nuke Gaben's yacht?

[–] dukemirage@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They ignored (legitimate) youth protection laws long enough, they could ignore this one, too.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 56 points 1 week ago (4 children)

“Non-traditional”? Homosexuality has been around and recorded since the Romans and even prior. 2000+ years isn’t traditional? That’s just as long as Christianity.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago

It's a dictatorship. It's not logic. Fuck the Kremlin.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It was illegal in the UK till the mid 60s, Russia is still holding out

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ImminentOrbit@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Your choice as Valve here is to either delist or not be in Russia. It is easy for me, as someone not in Russia, to cheer Valve to fight the good fight. But, it would suck if I were in Russia and suddenly lost access to my games.

[–] popcar2@piefed.ca 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is the most sane take I've seen. It's honestly weird how ignorant this thread is, regional censorship is not new. Australia has a habit of banning violent games. The Middle East and China have a habit of censoring all sorts of things. Many countries have their own laws of what is and isn't okay and they fluctuate all the time. My friend in Germany couldn't play Wolfenstein because any games with Nazi imagery were illegal until relatively recently.

Literally every company that operates in those countries also censor their stuff. The only reason this article exists is because [thing but Russia] gets more clicks and outrage compared to [thing in fifty other countries]. You're free to hate Steam for it but this isn't weird or exclusive behavior. They're running a business.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] flippinfreebird@lemmy.today 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah, I don't know why it's news at all. It happens in every other country with any amount of censorship, US included.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jazzkoalapaws@ttrpg.network 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But, it would suck if I were in Russia and suddenly lost access to my games.

Another reason not to rely on steam as a central point of failure.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Not a defense, but aren't a lot of the steam games at least runnable without the front end?

Not as much as GOG obviously, but some ?

[–] BillyTheKid2@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

Lots of indie games yes, but not so many of the AAAs

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

When "the right thing to do" enters in conflict with "what maximises profits", businesses almost always pick the later.

What makes this decision particularly stark is the response from other tech giants. The same censorship notice was sent to Apple and Google, as the game has been available on their Russian mobile stores since 2020. Both companies reportedly ignored the request, leaving Flick Solitaire available for download.

It's a matter of relative power.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 32 points 1 week ago (12 children)

This sucks.

However, I think it is important for Steam to continue operating in Russia: by seeing the living standards of other people across the world, younger Russians will develop those same expectations. Everyday things like furnishings, food, how people treat each other, and so forth. When the Russia we know dies, it will be important for the Russians of the future to have ideas and desires to drive them forward. Also, Russian authorities won't be able to fully inspect ALL media for LGBTQ+, which means that people will see something that they "shouldn't".

In the long run, the media that people consume will determine how they feel their nation should become. It is my hope that Putin's Russia will die in the coming years, and a better nation born from the ashes.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (13 children)

What's the alternative? They have to obey the law, right? What should they have done? How is this "bowing to Kremlin" as if they're kneeling, waiting to suck their dick or something.

Genuinely curious about these questions.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 week ago (16 children)

I wonder if the same people who say Steam should pull out of Russia would agree that Steam should also pull out from the US. I mean, that's what should happen given the basis of the arguments being used, right?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If the US opposes values Valve has then they should.

I’m not going to pretend Valve cares about these causes though.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] hayvan@feddit.nl 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's called "complying with the law".

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] slykethephoxenix@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I mean, if you want to operate in a country, you follow their laws when in the country?

[–] purplerabbit@piefed.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 week ago (15 children)

How about having some fucking backbone?

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Generally yes, but legality is not ethics.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (6 children)

So, human rights stuff aside, how/why the fuck do we need a genderised solitaire?

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago

Its a free card game with paid or grind to get skins. One of those skins is a rainbow camelion.

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Someone wanted to play a game like it, and someone else coded it and decided to sell it. Capitalism. You may as well ask the question, "Why does porn exist." People can't have sex whenever they want, with whoever they want, so a wank with some NSFW material solves the problem. A demand results in someone realizing they can make money meeting the demand.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 30 points 1 week ago

Because the dev wanted to make it and other people wanted to play it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

These comments are shit. Who said that you should comply with Russia's laws???

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Flames5123@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Surprised to not see it linked. Warning: despite being free, recent reviews point out how they’re pushing a monthly subscription to get all the cosmetics.

https://store.steampowered.com/app/3690460/FLICK_SOLITAIRE/

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›