this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
310 points (87.3% liked)

Technology

59596 readers
4131 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 11 months ago

It used to be that Wikimedia projects had lots of volunteers willing to maintain the projects, but the WMF didn't have a lot of money. Now the WMF is swimming in money (which it uses to do more and more "office actions" bypassing community processes), but editor numbers are staying constant or even shrinking. People nowadays like to spend time a lot more pretty much everywhere else on the Internet than on Wikimedia projects.

It is time for free knowledge to transition to a concept where people get paid, not the wiki concept that worked fine to start out in the beginning, but whose limits have now become clear.

[–] DashboTreeFrog@discuss.online 1 points 11 months ago

I'm all for CEOs and executives limiting their pay, ideally based on what they pay their regular employees, but of all the companies in the tech space to get mad at, they choose one that's actually doing a significant public service?

And I know people are gonna say it's the volunteers that do the real work but people still had to build and run things. I dunno, I respect them getting luxury pay more than anyone at Facebook at least.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Translation: business-types are salty about Wikipedia not toeing the line on the fiction that executive pay "needs" to be obscene in order to "attract talent."

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

They don't like it when real life counters their narrative, and this shows that corporations can pay reasonable salaries to their executives.

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I still think the "low" salary of Wikimedia is obscene.

There is no way even that figure is proportionate to what these people actually do day to day.

[–] Blackhole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

700k? For being in charge of one of the biggest websites in history?

That doesn't seem awful at all.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›