this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
101 points (94.7% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

2091 readers
13 users here now

A community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

  1. Be civil.
  2. Please do not link to pirated content.
  3. No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
  4. Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Old_Jimmy_Twodicks@sh.itjust.works 91 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Well, the past Aquaman films didn't look too good either.

[–] Techmaster@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago

No they looked really good but they definitely weren't very good.

[–] Ilflish@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago

I went in with no expectations this year, and being a fan of basically all the marvel movies in some aspects and the earlier DC films. I was actually legitimately mad that people still talk fondly of aquaman. Maybe I'm slightly biased as Nu52 Aquaman was basically the only comic series I read at that point but the movie was legitimately awful.

[–] li10@feddit.uk 38 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Good tbh.

Super hero films basically need to die at this point, or at least be reimagined.

At this point they’re just bad. They don’t have to be, but they are.

[–] freamon@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Edgar Wright said a similar thing recently: that the best thing they could do with superhero films is take a break, and wait for audiences to become excited about them again.

[–] Andrenikous@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

That’s what marvel should have done after Endgame. Wait at least 5 years before releasing anything new. Instead Disney does wha tit always does and saturated the market with subpar media.

[–] Lophostemon@aussie.zone 22 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Jason tried his best but really they need to get an actor in who suits the role. Like Michael Cera perhaps.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

They need the actor that played Beans on Even Stevens.

[–] averyminya@beehaw.org 3 points 10 months ago

"oh ow, my hand. That like, really hurt man."

[–] viking@infosec.pub 11 points 10 months ago

That movie was hot garbage. Can totally understand how the sequel doesn't get much traction.

[–] MajorHavoc@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

So we're learning that DC's equivalent character to Aquaman can't carry a movie franchise?

What's that?

DC's version of Aquaman is actually the Aquaman? The one famous for being a the wet sidekick of the Justice League? They made a movie about that character?

And they were planning a second one?

And only the second one isn't getting made?

Nice. Way to go, Jason Momoa! That turned out better than expected.

[–] thrawn@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean Aquaman 1 made a shit ton of money, it’s the highest grossing DC movie with nearly $1.15bil. It’s currently the 28th highest grossing movie of all time, made more than Spider-Man: Far From Home, Joker, and Oppenheimer. So it really did turn out way better than expected.

The second, which they did make and is about to come out, is looking to flop pretty hard though. He’s saying that there’s not likely to be a third because of this.

Which is fine by me really. Aquaman may have been a massive success and turned the character into a thirst trap instead of a joke, but I did think it was just mid.

[–] MajorHavoc@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Oh, we're getting a second one?! Sweet!

This is way more than I expected for "The Aquaman".

I guess my brain is incapable of accepting this reality where Aquaman is this successful at the movies.

[–] thrawn@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I think that was everyone’s reaction haha. That Aquaman? I’m still surprised it did so well.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Jason Momoa may love playing Aquaman, but he is unsure about the future of the DC superhero franchise.

The actor recently opened up to Entertainment Tonight about his concerns regarding future installments while promoting Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom, which arrives in theaters Dec. 22.

The actor has been open about his appreciation for getting to play Aquaman, especially because he loves the ocean and also wanted to be a marine biologist growing up.

The actor added, “I love this character and [I would want to] play it for a long time.

Momoa first appeared as Aquaman in 2017’s Justice League before leading his own movie the following year.

Though Aquaman isn’t currently in Gunn and Safran’s DC slate that they unveiled earlier this year, the actor hopes to remain in the superhero universe, even if it’s as a different comic book character.


The original article contains 339 words, the summary contains 142 words. Saved 58%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 4 points 10 months ago

Just add more explosions to move between scenes.

I didn't like the black manta in the last movie. Black manta in young justice was great need and we needed that version.

[–] FluffyPotato@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Honestly superhero movies are so overdone and samey that watching any of Marvel ones is like watching all of them, just radomized by an AI and DC movies have just been even worse. The best current superhero media I can think of is the Hartley Quinn animated one, Invincible and The Boys. The big studios should really move away from the formulaic writing and take some risks.

[–] HootinNHollerin@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

Terrible movie. Unwatchable imo

[–] Auzy@beehaw.org 2 points 10 months ago

The past didn't look good either. I fell asleep during Aquaman 1 and I think women only watched it due to Jason mamoa