this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
438 points (98.9% liked)

Privacy

39583 readers
324 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 105 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I’ll believe it when I see it.

[–] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

It will go to a 3rd party like meta first and then not be stored at google. That way google can’t turn that info over to the police

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 78 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

1cceb66f1504c54336992b9b1be421a4

I doubt it too

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Neato@kbin.social 39 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I actually use timeline. Does this mean it will no longer work on a browser?

[–] EarthlingHazard@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

From your desktop browser? Probably. You'll still be able to use timeline from your phone though since the data is still being stored locally

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

I thought the same thing, will be interesting to see if that can be done.

[–] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Maybe they don’t store it anymore, they just send it straight to the feds

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

With the prism project ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM ) along with things like 641A ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A ), G doesn't need to send anything. The nsa is already swallowing it whole.

[–] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Constitutional rights? You don’t need those

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 years ago

Rights? You don't need those

[–] 3TH4Li4@feddit.ch 24 points 2 years ago

When big tech says they no longer need something, it means they have something even better. When they say they give you options, they mean dark patterns. Anytime you click 'Decline' it might as well be 'Accept all'. Rapist mentality of big corpos.

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Personally, I use GPSLogger from FDroid on a 15 minute ping interval and then load the files into Location Map Viewer (also FDroid) for my own location tracking. Disabled Google awhile ago.

I back the files up to a home NAS.

[–] tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.net 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Have you heard of OwnTracks? It's a self hosted google timeline alternative.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Just curious, why do you feel the need to track your own movements?

[–] Cannacheques@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you have ever lost something and had to retrace your steps it helps but I guess it's not super important or relatable for most people

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

Ah, makes sense, that's a use case I hadn't thought of.

[–] phobiac@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I've used my location history to remember names of places I went to over a year ago, addresses I was given and expected to write down but forgot, confirm for myself I actually went and did something that I couldn't recall fully...

It's great for someone with a shite memory.

[–] worldsayshi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's nice to have a sort of diary sometimes. My only practical application has been to sometimes check which times I arrive to and leave from work when I need to report my hours.

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

Looks like most of the existing replies captured my same use cases!

There have also been a couple of times where my wife and I disagreed about what we did on X day and it's kind of nice to see who is right 😂

I think I also just like the raw data. I also keep spreadsheets of my utility bills over time, for example, because it's weirdly fun to look back and see or compare.

One thing I'd really love is a self-hosted all-day heart rate tracker, but have yet to stumble on such a thing.

[–] Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

With that measure in place, what likelihood do you think Google still knows your location?

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

4G masts can triangulate your location quite well based on signal strength and which post you're currently connected to so unless people are planning on removing their sim the government will always have decently accurate localization.

[–] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

I would imagine without the sim, they could still get the location considering emergency calling would work.

Probably would use the IMEI at that point.

[–] Vent@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago
[–] Cannacheques@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 years ago

That's actually a good idea, I might try it

[–] magikmw@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

Rare W for google if true. Will lool for sources.

[–] sqgl@beehaw.org 8 points 2 years ago

Will the old data be removed from the Google servers?

[–] epyon22@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Curious on the implementation. For example apps like signal and WhatsApp require you to either move or lose your data when you get a new phone. This will have to be the way Google implements or they are storing it somewhere on their servers.

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

The aren’t storing it actively in something you can search at all times, but it’ll be in the “backups” and “restore” pieces still

[–] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I enjoyed having history in maps on all my devices.

Too bad they didn't just encrypt it.

[–] jasondj@ttrpg.network 5 points 2 years ago

It’s not that simple. The user has to hold the key. And with cloud you want it to all be accessible from all of a users devices. And with a public service you can’t count on the user to be savvy enough to use their certificates.

Of course the fix to that is that the key is stored in the account.

But then Google has the key and can decrypt it.

So then the key itself has to be encrypted. And with what? The users weak ass-password?

All encryption has to begin with something that’s known, and the weaker that initial secret, the weaker the entire system below it.

[–] frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

Rare good guy Google?

[–] Pectin8747@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I don't think people here realize that not holding on to is different from no longer processing the data for their own means... There's no doubt in my mind that Google just simply has no need to keep the old data around anymore once other processing like for ML models and ad targeting are completed

load more comments
view more: next ›