this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
86 points (92.2% liked)

Technology

77902 readers
4763 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/55485315

all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 8 points 9 hours ago

Biometric data requirement to get some neccessary services is exactly the reverse of how a society should be.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 12 points 21 hours ago

Biometrics are irrevocable. If you're worried about stolen personal data, they are not what I would be moving to.

[–] angelmountain@feddit.nl 58 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There's so much stolen data, let's produce more data that can be stolen...

I feel 1984 we passed the situation in 1984 now, and the book now depicts a utopia instead of a dystopia.

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 54 points 1 day ago

This seems like just a ploy to collect biometric data for all citizens. Especially given the fact that Samsung owns a significant portion of the entire South Korean economy, and they also run advertising. This would be Google’s wet dream.

[–] lens0021@programming.dev 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Korean here. My country hasn't even collected the data yet, so it will. What were they thinking?

[–] Object@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

My guess is that they hope this somehow stops the scam calls.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 22 points 1 day ago

Considering the worldwide rise of fascism, I have doubts this is intended to benefit the citizens.

[–] SomethingWentWrong@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

There was a recent study done by the University of Cambridge which analyzed the black market for fake accounts across various platforms in multiple countries. They found there was a correlation with the price of these accounts and ease/difficulty in setting up a SIM farm for that country.

Snippets from https://www.cam.ac.uk/stories/price-bot-army-global-index

“One SIM card can be used for hundreds of different platforms,” said Dek. “Vendors recoup SIM costs by selling high-demand verifications for apps like Facebook and Telegram, then profit from the long tail of other platforms.”

....

A new analysis using twelve months of COTSI data, published in the journal Science, shows that verifying fake accounts for use in the US and UK is almost as cheap as in Russia, while Japan and Australia have high prices due to SIM costs and photo ID rules.

So the likely outcome of this Korean effort will be to increase the costs for fake accounts but not to entirely eliminate them. With the extra risk of another place for sensitive data to be leaked.

[–] shifty@leminal.space 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How does this work with all the plastic surgery going on and people changing their faces for vanity?

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Changing one's face enough to fool biometrics is so rare as to be discounted. Those bastard Tleilaxu Face Dancers though!