this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
468 points (95.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53939 readers
281 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] seaturtle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 363 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Heh, more of this shit.

Remember, the only reason we can still watch the highly influential 1922 vampire movie Nosferatu today is because some people didn't destroy all their copies despite a court saying they had to.

DISOBEY DESTRUCTION ORDERS.

COPY ALL THE THINGS.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 65 points 9 months ago (4 children)

The author in question here was pretty shitty. He wrote his own sequel to called "Fellowship of the King", and then sued Amazon and the Tolkien estate saying they stole elements from his book. He lost, and the Tolkien estate countersued.

The guy played stupid games and won stupid prizes.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] aubertlone@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Hey this is a pretty interesting story, got a link?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 251 points 9 months ago (16 children)

In my opinion LotR should've already entered the public domain but thanks to Disney well have to wait until 2044 for that.

[–] hh93@lemm.ee 90 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Can't have the already well-off children go without their steady income that they didn't have to work for...

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 46 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Well how else are we supposed to encourage people to be related to people who develop intellectual property? It makes sense from a neponomic standpoint.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 28 points 9 months ago

Embracer is gonna be the next one to beg for an extension.

[–] sadreality@kbin.social 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Reasonable takes like this hurt daddy's profits... is u a domestic terrorist?

[–] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 16 points 9 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website 23 points 9 months ago (7 children)

It may as well be, they’re endorsing all sorts of shit content lately (like the Golem game, or the ring of power)

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] pbjamm@beehaw.org 11 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Such optimism that it wont be extended again.

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 19 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Steamboat Willie, the first Mickey Mouse cartoon, will become public domain in literally 13 days.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] TheMongoose@kbin.social 172 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Should copyright for works that old be expired? Yes!

In the actual world we live in, was this guy ever going to avoid being sued so hard that his grandchildren will be embarrassed for him? No!

You've got to admire the lemming-like devotion to the legal cliff he threw himself off though. Writing a sequel to not only a copyright work, but one that is still in the cultural zeitgeist thanks to a 20-year old wildly successful series of films? Ballsy. Subsequently suing one of the largest companies in the world and the estate that produced the original works as infringing his copyright?

Chutzpa, I believe the term is.

[–] BustlingChungus@lemmy.world 41 points 9 months ago (1 children)

20 year old films? I didn’t realise someone had made the movies before Peter Jackson…

checks date of release

…fuck

[–] Selmafudd@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago (3 children)

They did make an animation before Peter Jackson's release and I'm too afraid to look at that date

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SomeoneElse@lemmy.ca 32 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)

Yeah, this guy didn’t have a leg to stand on. There’s an independently owned cafe opposite sarhole mill (inspiration for “the shire”) on the street JRR Tolkien grew up on called “the hungry hobbit”. It’s been called that since 2005 - before the release of the hobbit film. A production company sued this tiny sandwich shop, sitting on a roundabout 3 miles south of Birmingham for the unauthorised use of the word “hobbit”. That was completely egregious imo. It’s now called “the hungry hobb” - they just took down the last two letters on the sign. I really should grab a sandwich from them one day.

[–] BaardFigur@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Hobbit was a word way before J.R.R. wrote his books, stupid that they were able to sue them

[–] SomeoneElse@lemmy.ca 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

When it happened I thought the typeface was the issue rather than the word hobbit. But no.Here’s before and this is after. I can’t get my head around the fact that the production company sued this tiny sandwich shop. It’s so ridiculous!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] evranch@lemmy.ca 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ballsy? He's an outright copyright troll and anyone celebrating him here in the comments should read the article...

He wrote a knockoff book and then tried to claim Tolkien's characters as his own and sue his estate? Does nobody remember the days of BS software patent trolls trying to claim they invented "the app" or "method for clicking on things with the mouse cursor?" Do we remember how mad we were at those shysters?

This guy deserves whatever he gets.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 124 points 9 months ago (12 children)

Look, I agree his works shouldn't be destroyed, just not monetizable.

But the dude poked a bear with a sharp stick... Suing the creators of the story/characters you've built your content on for copyright infringement? Brilliant move....

[–] ANIMATEK@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago

Right? Like I’d go write Harry Potter 8 and then sue WB lol that guy is nuts.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 85 points 9 months ago (28 children)

Copyright's explicit purpose is to encourage new works.

Any form of "unpublishing" is theft from the public. You wanna say a guy can't make money on a thing? Great, fine, go nuts. But nothing any human being put effort into deserves to be lost forever.

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 77 points 9 months ago

Going after the copyright holder for infringing on your work, which by merely existing commercially infringes on their copyright, is one hell of a way to get sued out the arse...

Having said that, it is a crime that LOTR still hasn't entered the public domain yet.

[–] anewbeginning@lemmy.world 48 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The author then filed suit against both Amazon and the Tolkien estate, claiming the streaming series “The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power” had borrowed from his sequel and infringed his copyright.

The gall.

[–] sheepishly@kbin.social 14 points 9 months ago

I honestly wouldn't even be surprised. What was it, that thing with Star Trek Discovery taking plot points from some adventure game with space-faring tardigrades?

[–] NaoPb@eviltoast.org 41 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Tolkien Estate? What's that? People profiting off of the work of an author who has been dead for 50 years?

Copyright law is fucked up.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] PlasmaDistortion@lemm.ee 28 points 9 months ago

This guy was just deluded to think he was in the right or could win.

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

The only sane thing to do in response to this is the same thing that SHOULD have been done when Paramount went all sue happy on folks making unofficial Star Trek stuff.

Creators should stop making things related to their works and consumers should stop consuming and giving Paramount money for the official works.

The lesson being if the rights holder for something wants to keep it all to themselves, let them, forget it exists and starve it out of profitable existence. Spend the time and money with content, creators, and consumers that don't believe sucking up ever dime that's not nailed down is, or should be, the ultimate goal.

[–] Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Did you even read the article? This dumbass wrote a book based on LotR characters and then HE tried to sue the Tolkien estate and Amazon. This person actually probably needs mental help if they think this could have worked, it was such an incredibly bad idea that there has to be some kind of mental health crises involved.

[–] DrJenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube 23 points 9 months ago

Worth also mentioning the Tolkien estate is notoriously letigous. There are piracy sites that specifically ban Tolkiens works from being uploaded for that very reason.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 25 points 9 months ago

He tried to take them to court?!

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 24 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What was this guy thinking? He was clearly violating copyright.

Is he just soft in the head, or is he up to something us not crazy people can't see?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheLastHero@hexbear.net 23 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Demetrious Polychron

holy shit what an incredible name, don't even care what's this about, I'm with him. President Polychron 2024.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] booty@hexbear.net 21 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Abolish copyright law, it does nothing but stymie creativity

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] KinNectar@kbin.run 20 points 9 months ago (4 children)

More to the point, who's got a link so we can judge this fanfic for ourselves?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

While this is piracy adjacent, good on Amazon and Tolkien's estate for shutting down that trash lol

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 42 points 9 months ago (17 children)

lol, Amazon's LOTR was trash.

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I quite liked it, personally.

I imagine saying that is going to be treated as an admission of heresy here though.

[–] Cannibal_MoshpitV3@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

My problem is that Galadriel was treated like an impatient, naive child by other characters when in Tolkien's Lore she is already well-respected and older than most others.

Why? Because female? Bullshit, she was already strong and established by the time the events in Amazon's LotR take place. They dumbed her down and made her look like an impulsive idiot incapable of seeing evil when that's literally her whole character.

The showrunners did not give Galadriel the respect she deserved.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I think it's okay to let this one go doesn't seem like there is any value in his work.

I do think it's time to open up the rights to older IPs and let the community make their own stories within universes though. I loved all the star wars EU stuff as a kid.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›