this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2025
330 points (97.1% liked)

Privacy

44235 readers
96 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Smart TVs with an internet connection: Lets grab screenshots and send them to cooperate analysis advertisement department.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] criscodisco@lemmy.ml 134 points 1 week ago (5 children)

It's going to get to the point where we'll need 3rd party open source OSes for every device in our homes.

"Your toaster is spying on you, use ToastOS instead."

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Reminds me of the Cory Doctorow story Unauthorized Bread. It's as depressing as it is relevant even though it tries to shoot for hope.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I still believe this leaves a good market for a brand to just make privacy focused TVs.

If I’m buying a $1000 TV, I would pay $1100 if it means it’s just a screen and not smart.

The only obstacle is enough people wanting this.

Considers how much the average person cares

Maybe it’s a fantasy.

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

The problem is you can just buy the $1000 TV you actually want and a $50 Android TV box to get the best of both worlds.

Now if only there was better competition on that Steaming box front.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HotChickenFeet@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 week ago

I have faith that soon even 'dumb' devices will ship with small multi-year battery powered cell-connected evices that cannot be disabled, and are not part of an OS.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah. Looks like RootmyTV is only for older models of LG TVs and that's kind of sad.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago

tvs are annoying to the point people recommend never connecting them to the internet and getting a raspberry pi to use as a "smart hub" sort of thing instead.

[–] gabelstapler@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You're not too far off: there are water kettles and rice cookers (Xiaomi) and vacuum cleaners with app support (and definitely not collecting telemetry...)

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There are also refrigerators, washers, dryers and dishwashers that collect telemetry.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 90 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

It can't send screen shots if it doesn't connect to the internet. I own an LG TV and it's never been connected to a network.

For those of you who need it:

  1. Press the Settings button on your remote (the gear icon).

  2. When the side menu pops up, select Settings.

  3. Choose the General option.

  4. Scroll down and select System.

5, Select Additional Settings.

  1. Toggle Live Plus off.
[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Plenty of TVs are capable of radioing your neighbour's TV and piggybacking off their internet connection, so if it's not in a Faraday cage, it might be overconfident to say it's never been connected to a network.

[–] fan0m@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (17 children)
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don’t know if they use it on their Fire TVs but Amazon Sidewalk, for instance, does exactly what the previous commenter described.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're going to need to provide some evidence for such a claim. That doesn't even sound legal.

[–] Dran_Arcana@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not OP but I think this guy is remembering a scene from silicon valley, not from reality. That said it's probably not that far off. Amazon smart devices absolutely have this "feature" in production today-- and it's opt-out, not opt-in.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon_Sidewalk

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Thanks for that. Just another reason to be glad I've banned any Amazon devices in my house. It's already insane enough to me that people literally have to think before they speak in their own homes to avoid accidentally triggering the always-listening robo-creepy-spy in the next room.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Interesting. But my house basically is a faraday cage. I have no signal outside it from my wifi or any of the others because of the way they were constructed. I have to have wifi repeaters indoors and a mobile repeater setup to get cell coverage inside.

So I guess I'm lucky in that respect.

But all in all this is good information for people to know including me. Thanks for that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I also have an LG TV that I do not connect to the internet. How have you solved the problem of it frequently harassing you to recalibrate the screen, and connect to the internet?

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I haven't but that's probably because I don't use it to do anything that would require that. Like. Everything (switching inputs, volume etc) is handled by my receiver. The devices that are hooked up to the receiver all have their settings on device.

It may also depend on what firmware your TV came with and what model you have?

Sorry I can't be more help.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] oeuf@slrpnk.net 89 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I basically just assume that anything which is closed-source, networked and has sensors of any kind is a spying device. It's easier than evaluating each one individually.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago

It's called Live Plus.

If you've never heard of Live Plus before, it's a feature on LG smart TVs that uses ACR (automatic content recognition) to analyze what's displayed on your screen (via The Markup). LG then uses that data to offer "personalized services," including content recommendations and advertisements.

[...]

On Samsung smart TVs, for example, you can disable targeted ads by going to Privacy Choices, selecting Terms and Conditions, and toggling off Viewing Information Services and Internet-Based Advertisement Services. On Roku TVs, ACR can be turned off by disabling Use info from TV inputs, which is tucked away in the settings menu under Smart TV Experience.

Saved you a click.

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Rule #1 Do not connect tvs to wifi.

Problems solved.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

LG doesn't make disabling Live Plus too hard, though you do have to click through a few menus. If you want to turn it off, here's how:

1. Press the Settings button on your remote (the gear icon).

2. When the side menu pops up, select Settings.

3. Chose the General option.

4. Scroll down and select System.

5, Select Additional Settings.

6. Toggle Live Plus off.

In the Settings menu on its TVs, LG says, "By turning Live Plus on, you understand that the content displayed on your TV can be recognized, and that the viewing information may be used to provide you with an enhanced viewing experience and personalized services including content recommendations and advertisements."

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And then fingers crossed. Since you don't know if this option is doing something at all. After all their source code is not open source.

Anyhow.. Have fun. Good luck. And it's better to fully disconnect your smart TV from the internet and wifi. And just use your own home theater computer with Linux. And don't use any of their smart features or apps.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Steve 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've decided my next TV will be a Digital Sinage Display.

[–] extremeboredom@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I'm in the same boat... Somewhere out there, there MUST be a high quality panel with good contrast, viewing angles, and motion, WITHOUT the spyware garbage in it.

[–] iamtherealwalrus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I imagine the price of such a TV would be quite high, since the manufacturer would need to make up for the revenue lost from not having spyware.

[–] Steve 7 points 1 week ago

They do tend to be more expensive. But not extremely so. Maybe 20-40% more than a consumer equivalent.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago

Modern electronics and computers are a nightmare.

[–] JohnBrownsBawdy@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Why are people connecting their tvs to the internet at all vs using a dedicated streaming box? Are tvs now forcing you to do so on initial setup?

I haven’t bought a tv in 10+ years - want to get another but honestly feel sketched out at the prospect of doing so.

[–] Cat_Daddy@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

Look for "digital signage". It's a screen designed to be used for, like, menus in fast food restaurants. But watch out, though, because the Samsung one I bought recently still had an Internet connection. I've simply chosen to not connect it, but it still pesters me about it.

[–] bruhbeans@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I don't get why people reflexively suggest streaming boxes. A standalone Roku, Onn or FireTV is gonna spy on you just as much as any of these things. Apple TV is probably the best of a bad bunch (esp. since Nvidia enshittified the Shield TV). There's options like running the Shield with an alternate launcher or putting a ROM on the Fire stick or running A Linux STB but none of those are particularly accessible to the non-tech set.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

My Epson projector doesn't have a smart OS. A lot of modern cheap projectors are unfortunately broken that way.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have an LG "Smart" TV, but because I don't use it much (view the News in the Public TV and little more) I never connected it to the WiFi, so offline this Live Plus is irrelevant for me.

[–] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Not necessarily. Manufacturers have been known to use ad-hoc networks to find a path back home.

For example your neighbour gets a smart tv and connects to the internet. Now your smart tv connected to your neighbours and phones home.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Any proof of this. First I've heard about it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] culpritus@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I got a nice OLED TV as my main monitor. I only connect it to the internet to run updates if I think it is necessary (there is also usually a USB option for updates too), then disconnect once that's done. Works great for sailing the seas and streaming whatever. It's unfortunate I paid for stuff that I won't use in the TV, but that's often the case with many products these days.

[–] RoabeArt@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I don't know if it's still the case, but smart TVs were a bit cheaper than "dumb" TVs at one point, since the cost of the TV was subsidised by all the streaming platforms that paid to be included on the TV manufacturer's OS, and have a customized Netflix or Amazon logo button on the remote that opens their app.

I don't know if this is done anymore since there are hardly any dumb TVs out there being made now.

[–] Gucci_Minh@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago

I get the feeling they have started to double/triple dip at this point, full price + sell your data + advertise.

Luckily TCL and Hisense have made the price of panels so cheap that unless you want some fancy OLED that a 300 dollar TV is more than enough for the vast majority of people.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

For what we see nowadays in TV, I often thought to substitute it with a Fishtank, smarter content, HD 3D, true color and no spyware

[–] pankuleczkapl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Enough is enough. If I ever buy a TV, I will personally tear out anything even remotely resembling an antenna (including destroying PCB antennas).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›