this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
91 points (94.2% liked)

News

23301 readers
3712 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
rjc@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
dezmd@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
Blackbeard@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
91
Scientists successfully replicate historic nuclear fusion breakthrough three times (www.cnn.com)
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Scientists in California shooting nearly 200 lasers at a cylinder holding a fuel capsule the size of a peppercorn have taken another step in the quest for fusion energy, which, if mastered, could provide the world with a near-limitless source of clean power.

Last year on a December morning, scientists at the National Ignition Facility at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California (LLNL) managed, in a world first, to produce a nuclear fusion reaction that released more energy than it used, in a process called “ignition.”

Now they say they have successfully replicated ignition at least three times this year, according to a December report from the LLNL. This marks another significant step in what could one day be an important solution to the global climate crisis, driven primarily by the burning of fossil fuels.

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The energy produced in December 2022 was small — it took around 2 megajoules to power the reaction, which released a total of 3.15 megajoules, enough to boil around 10 kettles of water. But it was sufficient to make it a successful ignition and to prove that laser fusion could create energy.

Since then, the scientists have done it several more times. On July 30, the NIF laser delivered a little over 2 megajoules to the target, which resulted in 3.88 megajoules of energy — their highest yield achieved to date, according to the report. Two subsequent experiments in October also delivered net gains.

Promising results, hopefully it can be made practical at a large scale.

[–] kernelle@0d.gs 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's the next step hopefully! Building such facilities will probably be a big hurdle as well.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The reporting here is misleading - the energy in/out number is only for the fusion product and the actual energy output by the lasers. It does not take into account the 400MJ capacitor banks that are used to actually power the lasers.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Why would you count that as part of breakeven? If it's producing more than it's consuming, once ignition is achieved it can power itself. How costly it is to start the process only affects how long a theoretical reactor would need to run to cover its ignition cost.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Ah, I think you are confusing ICF vs MCF systems. ICF devices do not (and probably can not) sustain fusion; that 400MJ is what the lasers consume every time the system is fired. Hence why I called it misleading - it must consume 400MJ to produce any output. Hence why ICF devices are used to simulate nuclear weapons while MCF are not. Essentially the NIF device is a reusable and reconfigurable implosion bomb.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I see. Thank you for the explanation!

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Hate to bring down the mood, but this isn't fusion as in "Fusion power will solve the world's energy problems". This is the other kind of fusion, as in "Fusion bombs".

NIF research is entirely for the US Stockpile Stewardship program. Depressingly, the results from this experiment have absolutely no application to power-generating fusion research. Even the general research overlap in incredibly niche fields like plasma dynamics is microscopically small.

NIF does nothing good for the world.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

The director of the site is always always clear on this fact. This is about stockpile maintenance while adhering to the test ban treaty, that is it.

If it helps nuclear power in some ancillary way, cool! But the people actually doing this are not thinking about that day to day, and the people asking for funding are not requesting it on that basis.

[–] BoastfulDaedra@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Read the article.

[–] doppelgangmember@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

You've convinced me

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Listen. I know that pessimism is so widespread that we have to cling to whatever flotsam of hope we can find, but you're clinging to one of the top-three most unabashedly evil institutions the US maintains.

There's real progress and hope for fusion, Commonwealth Fusion being one I suggest you look into, but the NIF is not a group to cheer on.

Also, the article is misleading to the point that it might be intentional deception. NIF only hit 'breakeven' if you ignore, like this article has, the 400MJ consumed to charge the capacitor banks for this test shot. No fusion system to date has achieved breakeven. All this experiment has done is prove 3 times the discovery of a novel way of increasing yield in a fusion bomb.

[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Easy to be pessimistic about fusion but there’s been a lot of positive news lately so, fingers crossed! Would be a game changer.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is nuclear weapons research.

[–] BoastfulDaedra@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No it isn't. Light-driven fusion has zero applicability to a bomb.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Sorry to be the one to tell you this, but thats just not right.

NIF's mission is to achieve fusion ignition with high energy gain. It achieved the first instance of scientific breakeven controlled fusion in an experiment on December 5, 2022, with an energy gain factor of 1.5.[1][2] It supports nuclear weapon maintenance and design by studying the behavior of matter under the conditions found within nuclear explosions.[3]

Via wikipedia, emphasis mine

NIF is a key element of the National Nuclear Security Administration's science-based Stockpile Stewardship Program

Via the Lawrence Livermore National Labs website (link)

[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Nuclear power and weapons have scientific overlap, news at 11

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Almost none, in fact. There is a reason fusion power generation research is done entirely on MCF machines (I am ignoring fusors); ICF (like the NIF device) is completely unsuitable for power generation for an astounding number of reasons. All the usable contributions NIF has made to power research are either ancient or theyre in the realms of magnetohydrodynamics and electrical engineering (specifically, capacitor design).

[–] BoastfulDaedra@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I see you like to cherry pick, because what you're citing supports my argument better than yours.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I am being completely sincere when I ask this: what are you basing your argument on?

edit: wait hang on, both of those quotes start as the second sentence on both pages. not exactly cherry picking if it's statement #2 from wikipedia....