this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
157 points (100.0% liked)

politics

27039 readers
3271 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

CBS—under its new owners, the Ellison family—along with the Murdoch trinity of Fox News, the New York Post and Wall Street Journal, have covered the story aggressively, at times picking up unconfirmed accounts from conservative influencers that have spun into wild charges about vote-buying and cover-ups.

The New York Times provided front-page coverage to a Sunday news story echoing key arguments made in Trump administration talking points: that a Nordic-style welfare state in Minnesota, combined with criminal tendencies inherent to the state’s Somali population, created an environment ripe for fraud. The Times also focuses on the defendants’ claims that they were being persecuted for racial reasons.

But a Center for Media and Democracy (CMD) review has found that the administration’s preferred narrative has been advanced in widespread coverage by corporate media outlets.

all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Local news that's really still part of bigger giant corporate legit tried to muddy the news this morning by showing a report about an unrelated killing in the area, glossed over this story WITH the bs lie DHS spouted, and then proceeded to talk about yet another related crime back to back.... honestly pathetic. All these news outlets, journalists, etc that aren't outright calling out Trump and ICE are basically allowing it. Fucking cowards.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I was talking to a friend about his the other day, and he said he likes to get his news from "the left and the right" to get the "full story."

He said there are far fewer right-wing news sources, and that he doubted I could even name three. I had no issue naming a dozen, and I could have kept going.

Corporate media, by it's very nature, is right-wing. They will never advocate for the workers owning the networks or overturning the status quo. There are no "mainstream" leftist news sources in the US.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Some people get twisted into knots when you refer to NPR as Nice Polite Republicans

[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

Corporate Media Advances Conservative Narrative About Literally Everything.

[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Support independent media

Recommend status coup

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago

Billionaire media, not corporate media. It's easier to hate billionaires than it is to hate corporations. Corporations have been made to be defined as "a person" due to the billionaires owning the lawmakers and now a lot of folks are looking in the wrong direction. The dark cabal sitting behind it all are the "shareholders", which are mostly the same billionaires. It's crazy!

Corporate media (on the phone): Somali what? Is that a new gender? African... Tone grows somber. That changes everything.

Give me a few minutes. I have some YouTubers to call.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

When do you think the MAGAts bitching about the media will notice that they're eating their own shit?

I don't see anything in there that substantially challenges the facts presented in the New York Times coverage being criticized.