Why is YouTube clickbait so cringe?
this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
-26 points (38.0% liked)
Linux
56624 readers
837 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Why is YouTube so TOXIC?? 🤔
see? I did the clickbaity thing too
Where's the Mr. Beast 😲 face, Elon musk, 5 red circles and 30 red arrows + explosion?
(makes a reply video of your video, I add THIS and point up at your face)
So I'm an Arch user since 2013 and I don't think I'm toxic. I am not really offended by this post but a bit worried. Why this hate against Arch (users)? I use Arch, btw is a meme that may has some truth, but like every good meme it is exaggerated. Arch users may have some pride in tunning Arch but most of the time they're (in my expierence) helpful and inclusive. The OS itself fits right to my expectations: community driven, pragmatic, highly customizable. And I think the community is doing a lot for the overall Linux community with the Arch Wiki and for the Arch-based family with the AUR.
Edit: I didn't seek help in the Arch fotum myself but read some threads there. Haven't encountered any bm there.
meh... I have met a few true arch a-holes, however the arch wiki is a supremely useful info repository, so I generally give them a pass for their particular form of brain damage and hope the do the same for mine. as long as the arch wiki remains available, its a net wash. :-)
To be honest, a-holes are in every community. In about 30 years on internet I never find a community without some of them
Yeah, even as a non-Arch user, often many of the issues in looking into still end up at an arch wiki or with some other arch user who has an issue that similar enough to put me on the right track
The arch wiki is pretty on point for general information about specifics and can often translate across distros.
But like one of the OPs said, a lot of the folks tend to be a bit gate keepy/defensive or very much fanboys of specific distros.
Cringe lmao
I've made a few posts to arch forums and never faced issues.
Perhaps it helps that I work in enterprise tech support so I'm used to providing a lot of verbose info about a given issue I'm facing when requesting help. I also show what I've done in an attempt to resolve it.
Many of the so called toxic responses I've seen on there have been to posts that I would say don't follow rules or just give very minimal info.
Trilby is also one of the best responders on there but have had a few blunt responses from others.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=sHQFGhTiyk0
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.
In the worst case, you go to a forum of Arch Linux or an Arch-based distro and
- You are kindly told to do research. This happens if the problem is too simple or common ie. caused by a recent upgrade and affecting many people.
- You are warned because you have been told to do something and you have replied without doing that.
If you get punished, more often than not it is deserved because the helpers don't want to waste their time if help requester doesn't cooperate. Meanwhile OP, are you the creator of the video?
I'd disagree about that being the worst case scenario.
When I used to use Arch and asked a question on the Arch forum, they removed my post because they saw I was using Pamac so they assumed I was actually on Manjaro. They didn't ask me if I'm using Manjaro or anything, they just assumed I was and removed it.
I reposted the question and clarified that I was using Arch, but that got removed again due to it being a duplicate of a removed question.
I made a meta post about what I should be doing in order to not get my posts removed and that got removed as well, though I don't remember the reason they gave for that.
That was the last time I posted on the Arch forum and shortly after, I switched to Void Linux.
Sorry to hear that. Any sort of AUR helper, which includes Pamac, is not supported. If your question was related to Pamac, that may be why your post got removed. If you ever use Arch or a derivate again, try hitting EndeavourOS forums this time. They don't care which derivative you use as long as it isn't Manjaro. My points apply to present, I assume Arch became infamous when this was a more serious issue in the past.
What's the problem with Manjaro? I like it, but I keep seeing people hate Manjaro. Is there some reason I shouldn't be using it?
The concept of Manjaro is in my opinion perfect, because in theory it allows to enjoy the latest and greatest software while minimizing bugs. But the execution has so many flaws.
- The graphical package manager Pamac has DDOS'ed AUR twice.
- Manjaro mirrors Arch packages and holds them back, so it trails a few weeks behind Arch Linux. But Manjaro does NOT do this for AUR, which results in breakages and results in the next bullet point.
- Pamac offers users an easy way of installing AUR packages but this makes Manjaro vulnerable to breakages for unknowing users.
- Manjaro's website's SSL certificate has expired 4 times. This required users to roll back time to receive updates.
- There has been controversies around the treasurer of Manjaro as well as Manjaro establishing a company and becoming for-profit.
- Some editions of Manjaro are infamously problematic. For example Budgie does not recommend Manjaro, citing its flaws. GNOME edition shipped a Firefox theme extension which wasn't supposed to be used in production because Firefox updates quickly. At one point, the extension broke.
I am happy to help you with your experiment, toxic though it is.
Imagine giving a shit about what strangers use on their own computers
Regardless of the click-baiting generalization in the title (that's the YouTube game, folks) and the annoyed basement dwellers downvoting OP for it, there is some truth to it. Just like Stack Overflow community is similarly toxic.
It’s not like any place on the internet is all that friendly once it grows more than a couple dozen people.
sure, yet some are more friendly than others despite the number of users. Hell, we can even see that in "sublemmies" here.
I'm trying to figure out what demographic would be downvoting this to hell. Arch users getting triggered by a clickbait title? Arch haters trying to cope with a somewhat charitable take on arch users? Or are we all just downvoting for the meme?
I downvote because he asked how many he can get. Otherwise, I'm neutral to it, as I'm not gonna watch a video in public rn.
Also, I use Arch btw
Nobody watched the video and the down arrow is there for when you disagree, simple as.
I don't understand why people assume everyone reads or watches the content.
I can see how it's annoying... But it's more annoying seeing people complain about it because for some reason they can't possibly fathom that people post without reading/watching. They just seem like control freaks... It's the internet, not a private school or courtroom under oath.