this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
197 points (99.5% liked)

politics

27331 readers
2890 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Honse@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They are right, everyone else can talk the talk about how bad things are but there is zero action aside from a few instances of individuals actually using their position to resist and actually do any offense.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, they're uniquely empowered to sue on behalf of the constituents they represent, so they can do a lot more than most other elected officials.

[–] Honse@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The other officials could at minimum signal help. All I've seen is attempts to tell the public not to react to their occupation and to just let it happen. Dems need to start treating this with the severity it deserves. It's not like it'll put a bigger target on them, either, Trumps already targeting Dems for the smallest thing. It's more important that they signal strength and a willingness to protect their constituents, but apart from a few instances it has been very disappointing.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I see a lot of Democrats openly talking about how mad they are. There's a pretty extensive discussion about not voting for funding for ICE in Congress, and an active effort to get enough votes to impeach Kristi Noem.

There are also a bunch of Democrats calling for nonviolent resistance because they recognize that making the Insurrection Act invocation look ridiculous when it comes will be strategically useful.

A few are also just out of it — they're depending on the New York Times to tell them what's going on, and that doesn't work.

I think that's really the problem, the Democrats are actually multiple parties forced under a trenchcoat due to the electoral system. Unfortunately, the center (-right if you compare to other countries) is the wing that is in control at the moment, and that seriously has to change. Obama was more from the center-left wing of the party (yes, I know, that changed later on), and look how well he won. Yes, a lot of his policies got watered down, and he wasn't without his faults, but it was still a move in the right direction, I'll take the healthcare plan he got passed before the clusterfuck that was before it any day.

If you had a proper electoral system you wouldn't have the Democrats as such but instead at least two parties that cover the ground Democrats cover today.

So yes, condemn the Democrats that aren't doing shit. But don't forget to give credit to the Democrats that are giving proper resistance.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

I'm sure they are standing up for us but from the eyes on the ground we're getting gassed, arrested, and shot in the head. If the Democratic leaders want an orderly resistance we need to see more risk taking on their part.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Al Green is probably the only one doing anything. Day 1 he was up there fighting for us.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The problem Green and other representatives have is that they're in the minority. This means they can't do much more than make noise.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I still think that what he is doing does have some power and effect.

If for no other reason than to highlight the problems with the rest of the dnc and help us identify those who need replaced.

His stance also validated our feelings. We aren't taking crazy pills. There is a problem. It's real. Even if the rest of the dnc is pretending like it's not that bad, Al has sided with us and said "yeah it's real fking serious".

[–] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m convinced Schumer’s backers support him because he’s incompetent.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

He's very competent at pretending to want change.