this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2023
139 points (91.6% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
5843 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The flight system allows a plane to be remote operated by a pilot on the ground, which could streamline pilot airline operations in the future.

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 129 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Better wages and work life balance would also solve the pilot shortage. It's one of those jobs where companies over rely on people's passion for the profession in lieu of treating and paying them what they deserve.

[–] Mamertine@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago (3 children)

A decade ago, my pilot friend informed me that after 4 years of college, starting pay was $18,000 a year. After a year of experience suddenly you're making 4 times that. Not a lot of people can afford to make that measley income for a year. It's not a sustainable way to recruit talent.

Then there's the issue is being on call when you're the lowest seniority in you're position where they can call you anytime a pilot calls in sick and you have to be at the airport in 30 minutes.

You can make a lot of money, but there's a lot of bullshit to deal with at the start of your career.

[–] commanderbalok@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You're also gone from home all month and don't see your family, sleep with a bunch of other poor pilots in a flop house, then come home and get your crappy paycheck for less than minimum wage after you do the math of how long you were away from home.

[–] stevehobbes@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not anymore for most pilots. Pay has skyrocketed.

[–] Alto@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

For a recent example, Southwest Airlines pilots just won a 50% raise over 5 years, including 29.15% immediately.

[–] stevehobbes@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

That thankfully isn’t true anymore. Pilots are now very highly compensated from the jump.

[–] Overzeetop@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago

I remember back in the 80s (middle school career days) commercial pilots were near the top of paid professions, topping 100k on average.

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Lowering the costs of flight school would help more, making shitty money is one thing. Making shitty money when you dropped 200k to get there is another.

[–] VintageTech@sh.itjust.works 43 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Pilot shortage? I know more unemployed pilots that tech workers.

[–] Nommer@sh.itjust.works 41 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Right? There's no pilot shortage. Like with every other labor shortage it's a wage issue.

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's not just about wage. You could have great pay but terrible working conditions will discourage pilots from applying.

Never heard my retired uncle say a single good thing about his work as a captain for a commercial airline. Cheap tickets comes at a price.

[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social 17 points 10 months ago

Our modern economy and world are built on the need for wage stagnation. Unfortunately that only lasts so long and we're reaching the end of it. That is going to come with a massive correction that is going to be pretty painful for the masses because the last thing the rich want to do is not be making as much money. So how they handle it will determine whether they live through it or find out what it's like to be looking at the inside of the basket at the end of a guillotine.

[–] ZzyzxRoad@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago

I'm pretty sure they don't get paid anywhere near what they're worth. Same old story in the US: anything that's important to society, has to do with people's health, safety, education, and so on.

[–] OpenStars@kbin.social 32 points 10 months ago (2 children)

There is no possibility of this ever causing negative effects of any kind, certainly it will not ever be misused (like one pilot being pressured into flying 5 planes at once bc... profit).

  • Elon Musk, probably
[–] Overzeetop@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago

This is what I expect to happen to truck drivers first. Automating driving still needs help in the last mile conditions but can navigate distances easily. I foresee fleets of automated trucks which are remotely connected to pilot centers where truck "drivers" sit at simulated driving stations and connect from truck to truck as they enter or leave warehouses or transfer stations. Instead of a small percentage of high-stress driving separated with stretches of monotony, it will be 8 hours a day, 5 days a week of high stress operating.

[–] sighofannoyance@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I would bet more in the range of 20 to 30 in any 8 hour shift.

[–] FrostyTrichs@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago

You've been hacked. Pay 500 BTC to regain control of engines and landing gear.

[–] lemann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Don't most planes fly almost entirely on automated systems nowadays? The pilots mainly handle takeoff, landing, and monitoring the instuments if i'm not mistaken.

That said, remote controlling a plane of any kind seems like a very, very bad idea, cargo or not. If the 737 Max prevented pilots controlling the plane from the actual cockpit, I'd not like to think about what a similar plane would do in the event of a poor radio control signal and faulty instrumentation

[–] loanrangerofpeanuts@lemmy.world 57 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Pilots aren’t paid to manually fly the aircraft from A to B. They’re paid to handle emergencies and abnormal situations. The kind of situations that automated systems are extremely poor at handling.

[–] lemann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 months ago

TIL, thanks for the info!

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Yep.

If you want to see why we need highly trained, highly skilled pilots, with strong work ethic and principles, just go watch The Flight Channel.

When systems fail (and they do all the time), these are the folks ensuring you make it to the ground at an appropriate speed (or not).

"You never want to run out of airspeed, altitude, and ideas". We're a long way from tech itself generating ideas on the fly.

[–] planetaryprotection@midwest.social 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Thousands of military drones have been remotely piloted for decades. This news isn't as ground breaking as it might seem. Some of these drones are large: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_Grumman_RQ-4_Global_Hawk

I know a military drone isn't the same as a passenger carrying airplane, but for cargo I think the only reason this isn't already a thing is because drones are military tech and most governments don't want that falling into the wrong hands.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

My first thought was it's already being done with drones.

I'd be curious, what the military's loss rate is to non-combat issues.

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

Yeah autonomous flight has been a thing for 50ish years. But there will always be edge cases. Plus A lot of the safety we have in aviation that we have today is due to the two pilot system where every action is checked by your fellow pilot. I can't see a near future where two pilots in the cockpit are not required for safety.

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

It's a good thing that critical instruments never fail and need human intervention.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

I’m fine with self-flying cargo planes with no human passengers flying over uninhabited areas besides landing/takeoff.

[–] oDDmON@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Predicated, of course, on radio frequency communication being 100% reliable, 24/7, 365.

Which they are not.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

One interference away from crashing in a residential area..

[–] Mamertine@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

I'm more worried about it going into another skyscraper.

[–] RandomStickman@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago

I wonder how does ATC talk to the plane. Does it get routed to the remote pilot? The article describes controlling the plane through a series of menus. Does the pilot have enough flexibility when something unexpected happens like a sudden weather change or bird strike?

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

The innovation

Do they just not keep up with things at all? lol

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

"pilot shortage" meaning "pilot salary shortage". Fixed that.