this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
57 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

33651 readers
199 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What a time to be alive.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 1 points 10 hours ago

So, we're all agreed, right? Justifiable homicide?

[–] tiny_hedgehog@piefed.social 36 points 1 day ago

There’s no polite way to say this, so I’ll say it like this:

This is fucking pathetic.

[–] Toneswirly@beehaw.org 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The real question is: How is this ever going to make money for Walmart? The second a developer tries to put this in a game they're gonna be laughed off the internet.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 hours ago

Products that are only sold at Walmart or something they have a deal to market? 🤷‍♀️

[–] petrescatraian@libranet.de 1 points 20 hours ago

They likely won't. More likely, the devs will put these products in the most funny places (say, billboards on the side of the road in American Truck Simulator). They'll keep this thing running for ~5 years and they'll axe it.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I could be wrong, but isn't the title a bit misleading? As far as I can tell, Walmart made an SDK thing and pushed it to the Unity asset store. I don't think Unity specifically went out of their way to make or promote it.

[–] bl4kers@beehaw.org 4 points 1 day ago

It appears their "Verified Solutions" program is meant to help make and promote it: https://docs.unity3d.com/2023.1/Documentation/Manual/verifiedsolutions.html

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Finally we have a solution to "I want to play a game, but feel like I'm at Walmart."

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 1 day ago

There's been a few Store-something Simulator lately, soo maybe

[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Oddly enough that's not far from how many Unity games already felt.

[–] frank@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago

I cannot imagine wanting that to be in a game you're playing

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've been thinking for a while about once vr gets adopted more we could make virtual reality storefronts to use instead of websites. It would be fun I think.

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Welcome to the future.

[–] Euphoma@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The concept of buying real items inside a videogame has never made sense to me.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

With RickyRigatoni's idea, it wouldn't be a videogame. It would be a separate program you launch specifically to order things online. It just happens to use a game engine for its implementation, because game engines are the most advanced simulation tool humanity has developed...

[–] definitemaybe@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 hours ago

I could see it for some things. It would be great for browsing 3D print models or furniture—items where the shape/size matter a lot.

Like, an IKEA app that uses AR passthrough to show furniture options in your space? That'd be really cool, if it could be trusted not to spy on you.

Or an interior design app, that gave you a variety of options it pulls from a variety of sources, and you could add items to your cart right from the app?

For 3D prints, it would be great to have a virtual storefront of models to see, pick up, rotate, etc. 3D print .STL files are shockingly large (often 100MB+ for a single model), so idk if it's realistic, but it would be a great use case if it was feasible. (My current special interest is showing...)

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

A high quality VR store where I can actually physically browse the isles would be superior to trying to browse a 2D website. And being able to pick up a product, with a realistic 3D model, look at it from any angle and visually compare packaging sizes across brands - like I can in a real store but can't on a website - would be nice.

I can't tell you how many times I accidentally ordered a too small or too big version of something, because product photos on websites are always the same size (just fill the frame).

Of course, this will never happen. If a store had a budget to make this, they could use that budget to make their online shopping website 10x better instead.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

One time, I got delivered teaspoons instead of spoons, because I couldn't tell the difference from the picture (and the description did not bother mentionuing that at all).

Another time, I got delivered light bulbs the size of a toddler's head, because the manufacturer decided to use a picture of a regular-size bulb. Well, and in the online store, the size only got mentioned as actual width/height values in the details.

But yeah, we do already have the technology to place a banana next to your product, and to take photos from all angles. Manufacturers and stores just don't see enough of a benefit from actually doing that, so have a singular picture in a white void, which shows a different product. You're welcome! 👍

[–] gegil@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago

Is this actually real? Is it really no a satire?