onlooker

joined 6 years ago
[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

No, just have nothing to show.

[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Until I read your comment I was wondering what was wrong with it. Didn't notice the ring on the right hand either. Anyway, much appreciated.

[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

It seems to be more lightweight than i2p. Also possibly for Java haters.

(And right back at you)

[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago

I bet he was using a ouija board.

[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)
[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

I can vouch for Vintage Story. Crafting in that game ranges from arranging items in a 3x3 grid, like Minecraft to more involved stuff like knapping or pottery where you have to arrange individual voxels to make the shape you want. As an example, here's someone making a clay pot.

[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Thanks for the explanation!

[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I notice that the website has a "Powered by Tor & Haveno" button at the top. What's the relationship between RetoSwap and Haveno, exactly? Is RetoSwap a fork of Haveno?

[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

Still in development, I'm afraid. Not yet ready for regular use.

[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Holy shit, the author of the article did NOT hold back. And I'm glad he didn't, all the criticisms listed are valid and deserved.

[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Pros: You have the freedom to do almost anything on it Cons: ...including fucking everything up

[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago

Oh wow, that ESA letter is just so full of misinformation and misdirection, it's kind of embarrasing. At the same time, the POG Act is clearly getting under some people's skin, so that means the movement is working! Hope Ross & co. can keep up the pressure.

 

To be specific, I'm trying to find a multiplayer game to play that isn't team-based or co-op, which most of them seem to be.

EDIT: To narrow down the genre a little bit, I'm looking for shooters (first or third person, doesn't matter) or something more on the casual side.

 

What a time to be alive.

 

Doesn't this run counter to EU's rule that all small electronic devices - which the Switch 2 falls under - need to have USB-C chargers? In the sense that even though the plug is USB-C shaped, it's not compliant to the standard?

 

Lately I've been thinking about Voxatron, an incomplete yet fun little top-down-ish shooter game from 2011. I love the way it looks and plays, so I've been wondering if there are any other games with the same aesthetic?

It's a bit hard to explain, but what I liked specifically about Voxatron was how the characters and the environment were animated. Everything seemed to snap to an invisible three-dimensional grid, or in other words, voxels didn't rotate. Here's an example.

What I'm not looking for is a game that is made of voxels, but is animated like polygons, if that makes sense. Like this. I'm not really sure what term to use, because searching for "voxel games" was not very fruitful for me. Search results encompassed everything from Minecraft to Severed Steel.

I imagine animating a game in such a way would be super time consuming, but I still have to ask: are there any games that fit this criteria?

 

Not to say I hate the genre, I actually love me some Dusk or Turbo Overkill, but why, oh why are they called Boomer Shooters?

These games clearly took inspiration from 90s FPS games, which 👌, but they were played mostly by Gen Xers and Millenials, not Boomers. When games like Duke Nukem 3D or Quake were out, Boomers were what? 30 to 50 years old? I'm sure some of them played FPS games, but there is no way they were the majority.

Whenever I see the term Boomer Shooter, my mind goes to games like Shootout! for Magnavox Odyssey. Can't we call them something else, like Retro FPSes or something?

Anyway, rant over. Thank you for your time.

 

This is an email I came across at work. I seriously can't believe they're trying to justify being stressed. It may not be as caustic as other posts you see on here, but it still kinda pissed me off.

 

I mean specifically, what criteria does a webpage have to fulfill for it to be considered web3 compliant?

Because all I see around the web are people waxing poetic about freedom, ownership and whatnot without really saying anything. There's no consensus, there's no whitepaper, just... vague, nondescript ideas.

view more: next ›