this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
125 points (98.4% liked)

Europe

9111 readers
1953 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As countries on both sides of the Atlantic ramp up deportations of undocumented migrants, Spain’s left-wing government is preparing to give legal status to hundreds of thousands of irregular workers. Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has championed the amnesty as a way to not only give informal workers legal protections, but to also bring more money into a social security system increasingly under stress by the country's ageing population.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GarboDog@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago

We’re an irregular immigrant unable to return to our original country safely and our student visa ran out sadly. Very happy this is being passed. So many homeless people around just wanting to work along with us. We’ve been working under the table and have been wanting to pay taxes and contribute. Can’t believe we’re saying this but can’t wait to work again especially in a country that cares about its people.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 43 points 1 day ago

At a minimum you can't really go on about how an aging population demands more austerity if you aren't in support of something like this.

[–] shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'd love if this worked to bring more revenue, but there's no room for unskilled labor in Spain with the current (high) unemployment rate. This regulatory change acts like a call to even more immigrants to come in. And as in all of history, the higher the unemployment, the easiest it is for employers to exploit workers

Also, unskilled immigration specially from African countries is overall a net loss for the country, tax wise. I'd love if it wasn't like this, but a government can't claim to be socialist while flooding an already flooded work market and housing market with half a million immigrants just like that.

Again, I'm the first that'd be happy if this was even remotely useful to increase our quality of life, but it just isn't, it puts more stressed on a country that's hanging on a very thin edge.

[–] Evolushan@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Spain’s independent fiscal authority (AIReF) estimates that in 2017 non‑European immigrants had a positive net annual fiscal contribution of about €4,200, mainly because they’re younger and draw fewer pensions in the short run.

Also, the ‘half a million’ you mention is being discussed as a régularisation, not necessarily 500k new arrivals overnight.

Finally, if you have a source that shows ‘unskilled African immigration is a net tax loss in Spain’ (with definitions and data), share it...

[–] shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

This? from 2006? I'd consider this very much a different kind of immigration to the one we have now, It was two decades ago

https://www.airef.es/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Opini%C3%B3n_sobre_la_sostenibilidad_de_las_AAPP_largo_plazo/BOX-5.-Fiscal-Impact-of-Immigration.pdf

also feel free to check what I answered in the comments to another user justifying my initial comment with sources and such

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Also, unskilled immigration specially from African countries is overall a net loss for the country, tax wise. I'd love if it wasn't like this, but a government can't claim to be socialist while flooding an already flooded work market and housing market with half a million immigrants just like that.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence

[–] shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Before I give you mixed spanish sources, this is one of the best european made analysis on the topic of Immigration net revenue or loss by country (from the netherlands)

https://docs.iza.org/dp17569.pdf

Now these are spanish sources:

for example, africans in this graph only reach superior education or university 10% of the times, where locals are at 48.9% and latin american immigration at 31.5%, europeans at 28,8%, asians at 26%, and so on

Now, regarding work, just bellow that table on the same source, we can see the "activity rate" (so people that are either working or doing something towards it), locals 87%, average sits around 83%, africans are at 69%. For ocupation (which means they are actively working) 51%, while immigration from asia, europe, and locals sit above 70% points at all times, locals are at 80%.

For a final unemployment rate statistic of 8% for locals, 16% for second generation immigrants, and 25% for current generation immigrants (from africa)

(source: 4ºtrimester 2024 INE (national institute of statistics of spain))

You also have this study specifically on net tax win/loss, with sources at the bottom of it

https://fundaciondisenso.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/20250024_InformeXXIX-1.pdf

And again, I don't have any problems with immigration, but studies exist from a reason, and they are clear as water, I'd love for every person to have a chance to educate themselves, have a good job, start their life and so on. But that can't be at the expense of the people already at the country they are moving to.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz -4 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

how is this not borderline racism?

[–] shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 15 hours ago

What's the deal? I'm giving the data, I don't have any problem with any race, in fact, I also talked about south american immigration (be it white or black people from there) getting close to the levels of employment and studies of locals which means immigration with them is working, and a cool (and necessary) thing called "assimilation" is happening.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

How is data racism?

Data might lead to racism. Or data might show racism. But data is not racism.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz -1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Data is meaningless without context, bias and choices about what is taken as data and how it is taken. Data is a direct expression of the biases we bring to the table when we first begin with a question.

If you believe data cannot encode racism into it, you are a fool.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

As I said, data cannot be racist. The methodology to obtain it might be.

But then you should not attack the data, you should attack the methodology.

Any good study will explain their methodology along with the data obtained with it.

[–] shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago

Racism is the prejuice of a group of people based on their skin color. I'm not making a prejuice because I'm not speculating, and also, I'm not grouping them by skin color even, I also mentioned and showed that first gen immigration assimilated better, and latin americans too. I'm giving you data of what's been happening, not what I like or not, this is a serious topic