this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
156 points (93.3% liked)

Showerthoughts

41126 readers
706 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

My wife wondered if we are reaching the limit of human ability in athletics; I think we're only reaching the limit of people who actually take part in those sports.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 78 points 1 month ago

You’re correct and she is wrong, very wrong

"I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops."

evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould

[–] teft@piefed.social 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Theres a video on youtube i saw once of a rock climbing guy who went to a grip strength competition. These guys were body builders and he shows up just like 65 kilos of wiry muscle. He set a new world record in his weight class.

So yeah i think we haven’t seen what the human body is capable of. Not until everyone has leisure time to do what they want when they want we will see the true upper limit.

[–] birne@feddit.org 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The name of that rock climbing guy is Emil Abrahamsson and this is the video you are talking about: https://youtu.be/LnIkgDrgGoo

He competed again a year later: https://youtu.be/7uB9BqanPtY

[–] teft@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thanks for linking it. He popped up in the algorithm for me so i couldn’t remember his name.

[–] birne@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah, for me too. This was his first video I watched but I subbed to his channel afterwards.

[–] hank_the_tank66@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've made this argument before relating to motorsports. Due to the barriers of entry (mostly cost, geography and connections), the best potential racing drivers in existence (from a biological perspective) will likely never step foot in a race car.

[–] PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I would love to see F1 drivers being crushed by sim drivers

[–] MrFinnbean@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Honestly, i think most sim drivers could not physically handle driving a real F1 car. And by most i mean like 99% of them.

I mean accelerating a formula can hit you with force of 4g and in corners it can be even more than that.

[–] PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, it seems I made a quite ignorant comment; as taking these factors into account, would make it an entirely different showdown. Perhaps putting both in a simulator, sim drivers might outperform the drivers; but would challenge just a select set of abilities.

[–] MrFinnbean@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

That would be intresting to watch.

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I definitely couldn't run 100m in 8 seconds

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Dr_Fetus_Jackson@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

You cannot simply sprint into Mordor.

[–] state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We are very close to the limit of what human bodies can do without cheating. Genetic outliers who can slightly push these limits might exist, but they won't suddenly jump 10m, rather narrowly crack the 30 year old record of 8.95m, for example. And someone might run a clean 2 hour marathon, but there won't be anyone running it in 90 minutes. Until we do genetic manipulation or allow doping, the old records will stand or will only increase marginally.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Kinda but also maybe not

Records are continually broken and we do not know the limits when there is so much undiscovered talent and bodies combined w future technique and technology improvements

It’s kinda pointless to talk about but there are many genetic outliers who could dramatically push these limits but we will never know about them or get them in a position to train and try

[–] state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago (11 children)

We do know what human bodies are physically capable of. You can literally calculate that. With genetic outliers you can push this slightly, but not by a huge margin. There is a reason why so many records are still standing after 30-40 years. For a marathon, 2 hours is about the limit of human bodies. We reached that in 2023. Maybe someone can eke out a minute or two more, but without genetic manipulation or doping that's it. The world records for long jump were set in 1988 for women and 1991 for men. The record for high jump was set in 1993. For these sports we have reached what human bodies are capable of. If they are ever broken, it will be by a few centimeters. No human will suddenly jump 10 meters.

[–] MrFinnbean@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Well there is always the Bannister effect, where when somebody breaks some arbitary record previously tought as unbeatable, multiple people start to beat soon.

Also i want to point out that before the 1991 long jump record was made in 1968. So it took 23 years for the record break that time and for those 23 years people also said we have found the human limit. Until the now standing record destroyed the previous one with 5cm. A huge increment.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Some records may only be capable of marginal improvement but those are still significant to break

I’m really not sure what point you’re trying to make

These are world records so the people involved absolutely care about small breakthroughs and that literally proves the human body was capable of more than we thought, even if just by a little

Who cares if it’s just by a little? We are operating at the absolute limit of performance where a small gain is actually huge

[–] polotype@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

And we can calculate that bumblebees can't fly and cangaroos can't jump

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] T3CHT@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Statistics, anyone?

If we're a simple 'normal' population, your wife's idea holds; there should be 1 in 1000 athlete in every 1000 people. to get a 1 in 1000 athletic performance with a 50% confidence you need only take 693 samples. So if many thousands have played, you'd expect to have seen peak performance.

But we aren't distributed like that. Z score analysis of a measurable sport indicates a known top athlete like Usain Bolt is in the order of 5 standard deviations from the norm (depending what we consider the norm data set). That's more like 1 in a million to one in 10 million to get a Bolt. Which implies millions need to try (and train) to get a Bolt level performance (3 humans in that tier so far, implies between 3 & 30 million have tried). So a Bolt seems to be reaching human limits, reinforcing the wife position position for that sport - we are approaching the human limit.

But wait - that is a popular sport, with a single simple measure. If there were multiple relevant independent measures (say hitting and pitching, or running and throwing), even just 2, the odds become astronomical of finding the best. A dual 1 in 1000 is a 1 in a million. A dual z=5 athlete is 1 in 12 trillion.

So the implication is that for more complex sports where multiple attributes apply, it is much more likely we have not yet seen peak human capabilities. It's also much harder to measure and recognize when we do - so props to the legendary players, and keep searching for them. We won't know how good they really were until we sample (play) the sport for hundreds or thousands of years. Finding peak is incredibly lucky/unlikely for our most popular complex sports.

[–] MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

We have a student here in Outback AUS. Amazing at high jump and long jump. Went to the Big Cities twice to represent his state in athletics. And he only got a chance because the new sport teacher came in and pushed for him to go.

Out last sports teacher wouldn't have made the effort. And who knows how many other great students walked through our doors, and didn't get a chance to train/go big because of funds/transport/staff engagement etc.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Im taking your wife's side.

Competition squeezes blood from a stone. There are very few world records that were set without intention.

To your side, you could argue that I am making your point. Perhaps some folks haven't been thrust up to the plate to take a swing, and thus haven't been tempered in competition. Also, it's possible that knowing what the records are imposes psychological limitations. For example, Ewa Kawakami, at 9 years old, did three back to back 900s in xgames skateboarding vert recently. Tony hawk asked him how long after his first 720 did he land a 900. He said "the next day."

I am still going with competition being requisite for peak form. There are exceptions, probably for stuff like Worlds Strongest Man, but something like sprinting, deadlifts, marathon, fastest playthrough of flight of the bumblebee, etc, all take dedication and competition to rise to the top

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

Yes and no.

I've never played football; to think I could outplay, say, Sir David Beckham in his prime or whomever, is just complete and utter nonsense — in my current state.

Now, if I'd been playing football since I was a wee lad and I had built up that skill over the course of my life as I assume he has, maybe there is a chance I could have competed on his level. But we'll never know because I spent my life playing video games and reading books. I'm fine with the fact that I probably have more hours in Cyberpunk 2077 than he does. (That does not matter to me in the slightest. I'm just saying there are things I can do better than a professional/world renowned football player. And not that I am the best in the world at those things, either.)

Furthermore, I think the people who will excel at those things are the people who are actually doing them, because they had an interest and it drives them. The exception would be people who injured out in school and never had a chance to go pro. So if you change their past and remove that one incident, they could have gone pro and may have gone on to set records. But those of us who never had an interest in playing? No, I do not think we would ever measure up to one who has lived and breathed the sport their whole life.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nah. IMO genetics is a pre-requisite, but just one component. If you have the right body, you can be competitive if you do everything else.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This realization is part of becoming an adult because it also relates to your own skills and the people around you that do not have them.

[–] GreatWhite_Shark_EarthAndBeingsRightsPerson@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Realizing what in the post that started this thread?

[–] GreatWhite_Shark_EarthAndBeingsRightsPerson@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

By the way, I like that you & your wife have such interesting conversations.

Does it help to keep married?

[–] UncleArthur@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

We both think similarly, and not being serious all the time certainly helps! We've been married getting on for 40 years now although I spent so much time working away from home, I often joke we've only actually lived together for 8 weeks or so.

If you've ever seen 'Mortimer & Whitehouse: Gone Fishing' on the BBC, that's us. Everyone needs a Bob Mortimer in their life and I was lucky enough to find mine back in 1981.

Cannot find it, anywhere, WOW, DID NOT THINK THAT WAS POSSIBLE.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] GreatWhite_Shark_EarthAndBeingsRightsPerson@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Cool, I am glad it works for you.

My parents are a mess, should be divorced long ago, probably should never have met, I know the effect it have on my existence, but not been easy, thanks to what they learned & put into practice & their way too young as well birth of me. The facts is my grandparents were always verbally fighting, terrible matches & not good people ( arguably who extended family as well, because cycle of horrible parenting, especially the males of both sides, raised terrible people.

So, I am glad to read marriage works for you, but for me, I do not trust the insitution & think it is better without it. Of course I am expecting the perfect woman to even fall in love & I am not perfect, LOL. I doubt I will ever get married & Know, I will never ever have children, overpopulation-overdensity & extinction of All Living Earth & thus All Living Beings will eventually happen are reasons to.

My roommates cannot get enough of Brit Box & public media obsession with UK TV & movies, I think we fought a war to get away from. So, I will have to stop & check it out.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 1 month ago

It costs a lot of money.

[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

There has been a huge uptick in interest in the sport of weightlifting because of crossfit. Hampton Morris was our first US male Olympics medalist since the 1960s, and Olivia Reeves won gold.

I think for sports like weightlifting talent is pulled away by professional sports. You could go to the Olympics, or you could go play for an NFL team.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I wanna smash the record for taking the most creampies in 24 hours.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Don't let your dreams stay dreams 💪

Clown?

Okay, trust me it not good to not achieve your dreams, worse to not go after them, with everything you can give.

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i always wonder how the usa would fare in soccer if it actually had its top athletes playing the game. usually its the 4th or 5th tier athletes who play soccer growing up. the upper tiers either go into football, baseball, basketball, or hockey

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

it's america, most just go where the $ is. wages are capped, it aint called the labor trap for nothing. you want to escape you better learn to jump or maks your misery entertaining, got go win that lottery or you're family/community will stay poor for atleast another generation

[–] GreatWhite_Shark_EarthAndBeingsRightsPerson@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Everyone debating about genetics this & genetics that, what given has very to do with, heck is that not part of what we are talking about here- people do amazing stuff we did not expect?
It is about maturity- drive to do something. As a 40+years of sports IRW watching & what 5-years as a sports coach & 4-years as a FB player, but 40+(3-years longer)-years longer devoted to the sports I can tell you that is what really maters.

load more comments
view more: next ›