this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
726 points (97.5% liked)

Science Memes

19138 readers
4099 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

He traveled forward to ADD his name to give additional notoriety to the files like a Chad.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 87 points 2 days ago

as someone else said: now his time travel experiment is worthless, cause there’s a very good reason no one from the future wanted to go party with him

[–] raccoon@lemmy.ml 91 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He was dead when we found out, how the fuck would he come back in time?

[–] Shrubbery@piefed.social 71 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Being able to time travel implies he could also jump forward in time (e.g. to check his posthumous reputation).

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 22 points 2 days ago

Going forward is sadly the only way we can time travel. I explained this to Stephen in a couple weeks.

[–] Elgenzay@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But why does Stephen Hawking not being able to time travel mean time travel doesn't exist?

[–] corvi@piefed.social 42 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Probably a reference to his “time travelers party”, a tongue-in-cheek way he used to suggest backwards time travel is impossible

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe no one came to his party because they knew he was on the list

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Or maybe the time travelers went back and faked his name onto the list as a prank.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah...a time traveller would be able to jump ~~forward~~ less backward in time to check that.

But Stephen Hawking wasn't a time traveller, he just wanted time travellers to visit him.

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I want to jump over this time period to get a better time in future.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, all you need to do is travel at a significant fraction of the speed of light. That will let you fast-forward the rest of non-relativistic reality. Then it's just a matter of slowing down again.

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Sounds very simple, thank you for that information.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait I thought it was someone else sharing the same name?

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago

Nah, the dude really was quite shitty on several personal accounts

[–] Cattail@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Well hawking died before time travel was invented. Now time travelers probably visited hawking while he was on Epstien Island

[–] harrison_fnord@reddthat.com 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Didn't he also cheat on his wife with his caretaker?

[–] xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

And his movie just framed it as something like "needing" to travelling away with the nurse.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago

This is fucked up

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Edit: Joke already got made and I shoulda checked.

[–] Orygin@sh.itjust.works 39 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Was he implicated in nefarious shit?
Afaik Epstein had a thing for physics and other physicists are in the files because he liked the subject.

[–] red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, there's all kinds of names in there, but not in a bad context.

[–] Orygin@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

There's even the manual for bash since it was probably installed somewhere on his machine/servers

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Lawrence Krauss is one who is definitely not innocent based on his disgusting messages.

[–] BobDole4Prez@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

Maybe no one showed up to his time travel party cuz everyone knew he was a creep.

[–] bonenode@piefed.social 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How would he even go about removing it. Its not like "the files" are a stack of random paper pages in a safe somewhere.

[–] Maiq@piefed.social 40 points 2 days ago (4 children)

He could go back in time and give his caretaker a note to give to him a week before they met that said "And STAY AWAY from that Epstein... He's a bad egg!".

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 17 points 2 days ago (4 children)

But he’s dead not a time traveler.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

Which theory explains why he has not accomplished the above.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think the point is he was attempting to reach out to time travelers... or skeptically making fun of the idea with the time travelers party that no one showed up for.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If you were a time traveller, would you want to go back in time to hang out with someone mentioned in the Epstein files?

This all proves that time travellers are real, because they didn't go to his party knowing about his Epstein links.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Azrael@reddthat.com 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Does anybody actually believe that Stephen Hawking was involved in the illegal activities?

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I believe that he was probably a sexual person in some form and he probably had money so maybe he might have paid for sex. But I have no idea really.

[–] Azrael@reddthat.com 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe in his earlier life. He was married more than once and had three children.

His name does appear in the Epstein files, but he was never actually accused of anything related to Epstein. To say that Hawking was a pedophile is speculation at best.

[–] LuigiMaoFrance@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So about the same situation as Chomsky then?

[–] Azrael@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago

Pretty much, yeah. Chomsky was friends with Epstein, but friendship doesn't automatically equate to criminality. As far as i'm aware, there is currently no evidence against him.

It might seem unfair, but that's how the law works.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Another factor here is that Epstein was obsessed with physics and being friends with physicists.

While Epstein was always a monster. He could hide it around certain people.

But from everything I've read, the monster always comes out. And we all know what being Epstein's friend eventually entails.

[–] Azrael@reddthat.com 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

That's pure speculation. Your argument is what is referred to as "guilt by association". Your argument has no basis. It wouldn't hold up in court.

[–] Tonava@sopuli.xyz 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Also does anyone actually have info about in what context Hawking is mentioned in the files? That makes all the difference here, I'd imagine

[–] Azrael@reddthat.com 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Yes. There was a scientific conference held on Epstein's island in 2006. Hawking was one of the scientists who attended. There is no evidence that Hawking even knew what was going on regarding the sex trafficking.

https://www.justice.gov/epstein

[–] Bullerfar@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

These people don't care. I got downvoted to hell by saying the same thing. Apparently factual evidence isn't the norm in here.

[–] Azrael@reddthat.com 3 points 1 day ago

You're probably right. A story is more important than facts to them.

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

he did, but that is now a seperate timeline that we are not living in

[–] invertedspear@lemmy.zip 17 points 2 days ago

Doesn’t that just mean he never figured it out? Doesn’t mean it’s impossible for everyone forever.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is it though? There's the whole causality argument, where if time travel does get invented in the future, then you can only travel back to that moment

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Heikki2@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

What if time travelers didn't want to travel back bc he was in the files?

load more comments
view more: next ›