this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
92 points (98.9% liked)

Canada

11582 readers
852 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 6 points 17 hours ago
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Not only did he blow a 30 point lead, but he hands Carney a majority because he can't keep his own party together.

You really pickem, Alberta.

However, I have a real problem with any MP that switches parties, because they were not elected to do that. Jeneroux should be free to switch, but only after winning a by-election.

I would be pissed if a guy I voted for fell in love with the PPC.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Yeah here down south it's become a right wing tactic to run as a progressive then switch to fascism. It's really bad for democracy to permit, though the alternative is to encourage people to just stay in their party but not vote like it

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 6 points 23 hours ago

I don't have a real issue with floor-crossing, since it's true to the principle that you're supposed to vote for the principle, not the party.

But it's pretty tough to deny that that's simply not the way most people vote.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

It's less "pick", and more "always vote mindlessly for the candidate presented", if you're thinking of Battle River-Crowfoot. And they complained bitterly about the old guy being forced out.

Poilievre is a product of Ontario politics, otherwise.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 21 hours ago

Poilievre is a product of Ontario politics

He was turfed out of Ontario. He would be gone were it not for Alberta.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Funny how many Conservatives seem happy enough to go the party that is supposedly full of “woke leftists”. Almost as if the Liberals are actually conservatives, have been for a while, and too many of us are too stupid to have seen it.

Glad we nuked the NDP again for this!

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago

Labels are stupid, though.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

What’d they do to nuke themselves? The only complaints are “they don’t do anything” even they did a lot even just as the other member of a coalition government during the Liberal’s last run, and people also say they aren’t charismatic enough but I never once got the feeling that Trudeau was particulary charismatic and we just elected a boring banker who is even more boring now. Why the double standard all the time? Why do they need to be 100% perfect just to still get thrown aside but the Liberals get to be all kinda of fucked and we still consider them some kind of “default” party?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

What’d they do to nuke themselves?

by effectively folding themselves into the Liberal Party and by infighting like incompetant children.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

The fuck are you talking about? They formed a coalition so they could represent their constituents and force the Liberal party to be at least somewhat useful. That’s what governments should be and it’s why minority governments are such a good thing. If you hate the Liberals so much that you don’t want the NDP near them then what the hell is your real position trying to claim we shouldn’t be voting for the NDP and then, I imagine, should be voting for the Liberals?

And then they get in trouble for working with the Liberals and they get in trouble for not being a homogenous blob, too? You don’t have a real stance, your brain is fucking mush, and nothing you’re saying is backed by any kind of true critical thought. Embarrassing.

[–] jaselle@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Liberals aren't woke leftists. Nor are they MAGA conservatives. They're just sorta center, increasingly conservative but not particularly extreme. Not my ideal party but compared to what other countries have been electing I'd say it's kind of a relief.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ya’ll need to pay attention, then. They’re stripping back environmental protections “for the economy” and selling our shit to private companies, laying people off in a time when it’s already incredibly difficult to get jobs, and tried to help Air Canada by butting into the flight attendant strike to make it illegal and we’re all lucky that it didn’t work. “Elbows up” lost steam immediately and then we just fell in with China instead. So much of the good they did the last time was the NDP making them do it while Canadians bitched about the NDP “not doing anything”. They’re not “increasingly conservative” they are just conservatives and they are less and less afraid of showing it each cycle.

I’m so beyond over lazy, relativistic politics. Who the hell cares if they’re better than worst from other countries when we literally have a better party right here?

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There are very real reasons why someone would vote for Carney Liberals over Poilievre Conservatives, and indeed liberals over conservatives in general. It's intellectually dishonest and frankly does a disservice to yourself to overlook or dismiss these simply because you don't understand them.

For example, marginal harm matters. Even if both parties serve capital, they’re not identical in courts, rights, climate policy, labor enforcement, etc. Also, time horizons matter. “Build the NDP” is a long-term project; “prevent a worse 4 years” is a short-term project and there is little doubt that Carney is the best person for the short term project (and perhaps the best person for economic restructuring in general). Most people are capable of rationally doing both short term and long term planning and decision making. And also, finally, coalitions in our government are a reality. In Canada, minority/parliament dynamics make “vote + apply pressure” a real lever. Treating all “lesser evil” as pure self-sabotage ignores that. Many Liberal voters can acknowledge the value of the NDP while also acknowledging their shortcomings. Many Liberal voters have voted NDP in the past when it made sense strategically.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago

And also, finally, coalitions in our government are a reality. In Canada, minority/parliament dynamics make “vote + apply pressure” a real lever.

A-fucking-men to that. It frustrates me to no end that people (conservatives) don't understand that that's precisely how a minority goverment is supposed to function.

You'd watch Pierre Poppinfresh get on his stump about "collusion" between the NDP and the Liberals like it's some kind of conspiracy when in reality it's just how shit gets done. Negotiation and compromise.

The conservative party (at least those that are on the MapleMAGA spectrum) have a binary view of governning; if they're not the ones in power, they would rather not contribute to the government by negotiating and having a hand in shaping policy, because doing so would give the Liberals a "win" and that is anathema to a modern hard-C Conservative.

So instead of actually actively taking part in government, they stump around shouting at the other parties that do.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

And how is the NDP supposed be built if we keep not voting for them? Are they supposed to just do a bunch of work for free for a few decades? They basically already have, and they simply got loss of official party status as a reward for that.

The Liberals aren’t just boring, they’re actively harmful. I don’t want Poilievre anywhere near power either but I’m not so naive as to believe that this battle is over, or even progressing, just because we sacrificed our values again. They’ve become very close to the conservatives we were all supposed to be afraid of back in 2021, and their trajectory is that they’re getting worse, not better. If the Liberal voters are so wise, should they not be acutely aware of this fact?

You even admit that coalitions work and, I imagine, understand that the NDP used their leverage to get Canadians things that we needed when the Liberals weren’t going to on their own. They fight for us even when they aren’t in full control. How are they supposed to form a coalition without having any seats?

It’s always “now is not the time” with you lot. It’s cowardly and weak. You’re right that it’s going to take time, so we better start now if we want to see any change in the future. Yes, it will suck for a moment, but do you really believe that the solution is to make endless excuses every single election cycle?

[–] jaselle@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The NDP have a good platform, ticks my boxes, but they seem kinda incompetent to me.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

And they constantly in fight and bicker over who gets to ride the highest horse.

[–] Mpatch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Lol dam, straight. The NDP are like 16 year Olds who see the world through rose color glasses.

Instead of doing shit to make more jobs and better jobs, they would rather just make a bigger welfare program.

Andrea horwath , the former leader of ontario, ndp. Current mayor of hamilton. Worst fucking mayor I have ever seen. Blows a bunch of money on tiny home bulshit that flopped like old man dick. Raised property taxes in the city with the highest property tax already. Doesn't seem to understand how everyone does lunch everyday with out having catering

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why? Was it all the stuff they got done when the only power they had was a coalition government? What was it? And Carney getting stuff done is better even though the stuff being done is bad? What about the Liberals and their constant lying, scheming, and persistent disdain for the working class make them a better choice?

Are for real? You cannot honestly be that stupid, can you?

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hey friend I, and many others here, may be sympathetic to the disrespect that the NDP gets, but your hyperpartisan and absolute rejection of other parties (and similarly- framed NDP boosting) comes across poorly.

Do you honestly believe the NDP is the only honest, principled and righteous party in the country? And you believe they would stay that way when they necessarily grew their tent in order to assume power?

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

I believe, as I’ve stated, that if you claim to be progressive and think that the Liberals will save you, you’re a fucking idiot. I have been abundantly clear.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

I'm glad we nuked the NDP. Not for this but for a leftist renewal that was impossible under Jagmeet.

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

That area of Edmonton has never voted in a Liberal, and now they are Liberals. I'm sure his constituency loves it.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 21 hours ago

Who cares, Carney will give Jeneroux a Senate appointment if he loses next election.

Are people really this naive about floor crossers?

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Conservatives are dumb as hell, they probably don’t even realize that they’re getting the same ideology they used to vote for just under a different name.

If I could magic one seemingly small thing into the world it would be to make everyone think just a tiny bit more about what they were doing. It would be to make them vote honestly and in alignment with their ideology and not based on their past choices or party branding.

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world -1 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Why's Edmonton so cheap to live if its so dumb. Housing is some of the cheapest in Canada, and beats Toronto in housing completions. Maybe voting for progressives who hire Gregor Robinson as a housing minister are the dumb ones?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 21 hours ago

Why’s Edmonton so cheap to live if its so dumb.

Because it's Edmonton.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

That’s not the burn you think it is, not even fucking close. Also fucking hilarious that you think Carney is a progressive.

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Well he crossed over to the Liberals, I'd agree if we had a progressive version of the NDP that would be ideal. Like if Eby ran the federal NDP.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The NDP is the most progressive thing we have with real coverage, and the Liberals are, at this point, just conservatives that don’t openly hate minorities.

What the hell are you talking about?

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

How do they not hate minorities when they ran what the UN called "modern slavery".

They have so little regard for these people they also did it into an existing housing crisis, so these people lived 30 to a basement.

Did the Liberals need to take literal shits on these people for them to convince you they don't care about them beyond growing GDP?

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Brother, I have no clue what conversation you’re having or with who. I detest the Liberals, have never voted for them, do not trust any rotten word out of their mouths, and did say “openly hate”, with italics and everything, but if you keep responding as if I’m writing in favour of them then I’m not surprised you missed that part, too.

Go take a deep breath, buddy.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago

The article has the wrong thumbnail.

[–] jaselle@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

~~If I'm not mistaken, this makes it a liberal majority doesn't it?

I kind of liked that the Greens held the balance of power so I'm a little disappointed here.~~ nvm seems they'd still be 1 short.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're still three seats shy, thanks to the resignations of Blair and Freeland, and the Supreme Court overturning Tatiana Auguste's election.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The first two are safe seats, though. OP might get their wish, barring more crossings soon.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/conservative-matt-jeneroux-resigns-9.6970100

As the article points out, this is the same Matt Jeneroux that said he was going to resign last fall. Is he takeback-ing it before committing to an official end date, cancelling the by-election? From the November article:

Jeneroux later clarified that his "exact date of departure will be determined at a later day," but suggested it would be "this spring."

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It'll be interesting to hear what he has to say for himself.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"Those conversations [with his family over the holidays] have been honest, difficult and deeply personal at times. But they also led me to reflect on the gravity of the moment that our country is living through — which our prime minister addressed head on in his speech at Davos. For Canada, this is a moment that demands steady leadership, constructive collaboration between all parliamentarians."

"After further reflection with my family, and conversations with colleagues and constituents, I will be continuing to serve in Parliament — and I will be working with Prime Minister Mark Carney as a part of his new government to help build our country’s strength as we face the challenges ahead."

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Damn, Carney's legendary speech still changes lives!

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

We should have an election then, let the electorate decide who it should be. Deciding to just join another party on a whim to give them a majority clearly just leads to further divide in the long run.

Given Carney is currently high in the polls he should just call an election, and ask the people for a full mandate, rather than this cloak and dagger nonsense.

[–] definitemaybe@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Eh... There was like a 5% vote difference in Edmonton Riverbend, with an almost exact 50/50 left-right vote split.

In a sane electoral system, like STV, the area would have something like 2 Liberal MPs, 0-1 NDP MPs, and 2-3 Con MPs.

This isn't a great shift against local political preferences.