this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
5 points (60.0% liked)

Technology

82188 readers
3899 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

I hope they call it "SlopTrough"

[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 hours ago
[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 18 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Was self-hosting gitlab or foregejo not an option?

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 3 points 3 hours ago

It was but then how could they pitch that to investors?

[–] DrCake@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They’ll probably just fork forgejo add some slight “ai agentic” bullshit and market it as their own product.

I was going to say hopefully the forgejo licence doesn’t allow that but then again, OpenAI have shown they don’t really care about copyright or anything like that

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Forgejo is licensed under GPLv3, so I think it isn't possible to do so

[–] Melusine@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 2 points 7 hours ago

Correct me if I wrong, but the GPL has the weakpoint of web distribution in the sense that a backend is not shipped to the client, so you can keep a forked GPL product without publishing back. The AGPL was made for this (and the SSPL (I think) is like any network interface needed should be published too).

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 5 points 8 hours ago

Those aren’t “agentic” enough.

[–] halfapage@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago

im tired boss

[–] Casterial@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Why? Seems like a massive waste of resources. We already have several source controls

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Github is not source control

[–] Casterial@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

No, but there are so many other systems already out there that compete with it. Why reinvent the wheel when your company is already bleeding billions?

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 1 points 20 minutes ago

Gotta keep throwing shit at the wall.

[–] gilokee@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago